Essay Sample on Cultural Validity

Introduction

Considering the multicultural diagnosis and conceptualization, the author's enquiry the cultural validity of diagnosing multicultural because the text illustrates that "ignoring the importance of cultural differences when diagnosing and assessing individuals from diverse backgrounds can lead to unfair and unethical testing" (Hays & Erford, 2014). The authors do not support the idea of ignoring the cultural legality in multicultural clients. Besides, they feel that during the assessment, there is a need to address the cultural background of the clients since that has been noticed to impact the manner in which people may react to the assessment. For example, according to the text, "the wording, contextual information, illustrations, the wording, and layout in a test item may reflect the beliefs of a particular cultural group.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

To guarantee the best probable outcome during an assessment, the background, religion, gender, and family situation of the client should be taken into account. Ignoring this information during the evaluation could penalize a few individuals from precise cultural backgrounds. Considering that the assessment has a substantial effect on clinical results, especially those associated with what is abnormal or reasonable it is crucial that the appraisal be as neutral as possible (Hays et al., 2014). Consequently, the authors finalize that it is necessary that cultural variations are considered as part of the assessment to ensure the data obtained from the assessment is as precise as possible since it influences that diagnoses as well as the client's treatment plan. A study conducted by Jones, Lee, Zigareli &Nakagawa (2016), supports further the conclusions of Hays & Erford, which states that clients responded more to therapy, were ready for any plan of treatment and had better results when provided with culturally responsive treatment in comparison of therapeutic methods that ignored the cultural difference. Additionally, they noted that the efficiency of the treatment increased through the use of culturally sensitive therapy (Jones et al., 2016).

Based on the provided evidence in the text as well as through increased research, I concur that multicultural clients could be misdiagnosed incase their cultural variations are considered, precisely during the process of assessment. If a culturally diverse customer is asked a query on evaluation and he or she answers differently than average, their cultural identity and background must be checked as part of the assessment, or else, the findings of the evaluation could erroneously reflect the situation of the client.

It is crucial to note that Hays et al., acknowledges that the counselor along with an impartial evaluation should remain unbiased. Assuming that people linked with a particular culture share universal norms can be easy, though, it would be presumed for a counselor to make those conclusions regarding their client hastily. It is significant for the counselor to be free minded when handling culturally diverse clients because rushing into findings about their expectations from the client regarding their cultural background could fail and harm the relationship between the counselor and the client (Jones et al., 2016).

References

Hays, D. G., & Erford, B. T. (2014). Developing multicultural counseling competence: A systems approach (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Jones, J., Lee, L., Zigarelli, J., & Nakagawa, Y. (2016). Culturally Responsive Adaptations in Evidence-Based Treatment: the Impact on Client Satisfaction. Contemporary School Psychology, 1-12.