The complexity of some urban centers like Charleston in South Carolina has made it so hard to effectively address their issues like the gradual changes that keep on happening. As a result, an integrated approach can be used to perfectly enhance this rather than a single approach. To enable the growth of such towns in future, mitigation process has been initiated, and this will ensure that in the next five years, these towns have made great deviation positively in terms of its infrastructure and even its environmental effects.
Since the aim of setting up this mitigation plans is to help in eradicating the possible occurrences of either new or similar disasters that had been witnessed in the past, Therefore, this plans must be properly evaluated to check and predict any errors or difficulties that may arise In the process of implementation. In doing so, the following considerations may greatly help.
First, it is important to consider and reframe all the disasters that have occurred in the past in Charleston town, if this happens to miss among the mitigation plans, it would be difficult to predict on which problems that may arise in future for the span of 5 years. For example in this town, civil war has really affected its growth. Charleston was initially a great agricultural asset for large scale production of various agricultural products that was used all over or in a bigger portion of the country. It would, therefore, make no sense to expect good from the plans set if, during the setting of the plans, the various past problems were not discussed and considered. Additionally, their inclusion would help to prevent the town by experiencing such a problem for the second time (Allen, 2003).
Secondly, the causes of these disasters must be considered during the setting up of these plans. The knowledge, for example, the great problem that was facing Charleston town, civil war, came from nowhere, but originated from something, it is important to take note on this effects so that when expecting for suppression of this in future 5 years, the root of the suspected problem can be expurgated from its source, a matter which will greatly assist. Nevertheless, when the causes of the past problems are not considered, then it may be hard during the implementation, to know what to do and what not to do and so any outcome either positive or negative may be possible come 5 years (Bullock, 1967).
The time duration that the plan picked can take so that it can fully get implemented can also be considered, this is because there are some plans that may need a comparatively large amount of time for them to be fully put into practice or to bear some benefits as objected. Like in Charleston town in South Carolina, it is important to include short lasting problems that will need less than 3 years to get completed so that the last two years become acts as the testing period to check on whether there are still more or the issue has been resolved. If the mitigation plans stated will be too complicated that may need longer time then the needs or the goals in the next 5years earlier set may not be possible (Thorne, 2009).
The last thing to check on is the resources that will be needed in the process of implementation to effectively attain the goals. The plans must only require the uses of available resources or low-cost resources to implement except if it is proper and enough allocation of funds to finance the process. It is therefore of big importance for the goals to be easy to understand so that positive or successful results are obtained in the next 5years (Geogakopoulas, 2000).
From the above illustrations, important points that should be used for the implementation of the mitigation process set are highlighted and suppose the plans can meet all of them, then it is promising to attain success at the end of the fifth year, no more or very few problems will still be existing within the town of Charleston town
References
Allen, J., & Lu, K. (2003). Modeling and prediction of future urban growth in the Charleston region of South Carolina: a GIS-based integrated approach. Conservation Ecology, 8(2).
Bullock, H. A. (1967). History of Negro education in the south (p. 75). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Thorne, J., Huber, P., Girvetz, E., Quinn, J., & McCoy, M. (2009). Integration of regional mitigation assessment and conservation planning. Ecology and Society, 14(1).
Georgakopoulos, D., Schuster, H., Baker, D., & Cichocki, A. (2000). Managing escalation of collaboration processes in crisis mitigation situations. In Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Data Engineering (Cat. No. 00CB37073) (pp. 45-56). IEEE.
Cite this page
Essay on Urban Complexity: Enhancing Growth Through an Integrated Approach. (2022, Dec 29). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/essay-on-urban-complexity-enhancing-growth-through-an-integrated-approach
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- Essay Example on How Social Media Affect Teens
- Creativity, Music and Painting Are My Life Passion - Essay Sample
- Essay Sample on Jim Dine Art Work
- Social Media Impact on Society, Relationships, & Attitudes - Essay Sample
- Essay Example on Bergman's Films: Redefining Cinema With Chromatic Imagery and Naturalism
- Rise in Motor Vehicles: Impact on Air Pollution and Environment - Essay Sample
- Paper Example on Celebrate Photography, Cartoons & Bicycles: Seeding Happiness