Essay on President Andrew Jackson's Message on National Bank and Its Impact on Politics

I agree with President Andrew Jackson's message concerning the national bank and its activities regarding the political situation in the year 1832. His message is impactful, where it discouraged several unpleasant political activities in the nation. Therefore, I think that the president was right about the national bank's activities. On my take, the president was right about the bank since it promoted a conducive environment for bribery, which is a form of corruption. In this case, the bank was slightly irrelevant for political activity at that time.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

On the other hand, President Andrew was right about the bank since it consisted of other foreign stockholders. He also stressed on the fact that the bank should consist of stockholders of the state who could tell, know, and act upon the government and also enthusiastic about supporting it in times of crisis and dangers. Also, it is important that the president stressed on theirresponsibility nature that may arise during the activity of the bank due to the foreign stockholders. He is right since they could have elected themselves as the president and directors of the bank, which leads to poor management and difficulty in controlling the bank. In this case, the president's message towards the bank was right and accordingly.

Also, I think that president Jackson was right about the bank due to the fact written on the message regarding the pure election and peace; the president argued that the bank's interests are centered by the foreigners, which is dangerous for political activities. In this case, the president was right about the bank's activities on the political perspective at that time. The president further analyzed the duty of the house of both the senate and the president, where he claims that it's their responsibility to agree upon the constitutionality of any tenacity or bill. In this case, the president's statement against the bank was right, which concludes that the financial institution was irrelevant for political activities at that time based on his declaration.

I view that the message of the president to the national bank was right since he evidently showed that there was no legitimate role of the financial institution, which made it necessary. Furthermore, I think that he was right when he stated that the rich and powerful individuals took advantage of their status in the financial institution to change the government constitution for their own desires. The statement was supported when President Jackson expounded further by highlighting that the bank's involvement in the political activity regarding the bill was to make the rich richer. It was an inconvenient atmosphere since the less fortunate and humble individuals are left behind as they feel insecure.

On the other hand, I support the president's fight against the government since it encompasses the abusive individual, as indicated in his last statement. The other fact that leads to my proposition falls under that objected act of integrating subscribers to the bank of the united states. Moreover, it constitutes of individuals who are rich in which is unfair since and easy for dishonest activities to occur at that time of politics.

Conclusion

In a nutshell, President Andrew Jackson's message concerning the national bank and its activities regarding the political situation in the year 1832 is impactful since it discouraged several unpleasant political activities in the nation. Therefore, the president was right about the national bank's activities since it promoted a conducive environment for bribery, which is a form of corruption.