Essay Example on Thomistic Realism: Knowing God in Creation

Introduction

The Thomistic approach is mostly engrained on the fact that we only know God through the general revelation of his creation but only in a manner which is analogous. Thomas has fundamental insights where he modelled his exegetical and theological writings into realism. Unlike Benedict's theological tasks, there are different phases to Thomas' doctrine and Scripture. Each of these phases has varied declarations. For instance, the Summa Theologiae purport that the sacred doctrine is a science since it has a divine revelation. Thomas has varied opinions on different issues to signify his stance on the Scripture. However, Benedict notion of theology is primarily based on exegesis, where he uses the historical readings to justify the biblical and liturgical elements in the Bible. Thomas believes that scripture words are ways through which the human mind traverse various biblical understanding.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The use of science is highly employed in Thomistic approach. Scientia is the fundamental aspect of the argument where it is portrayed that the Scripture is scientific since it leads to knowledge for the individuals that read it. Benedict, on the other hand, sees it as a way through which people can understand the Scripture without having to refute its typological sense. The Scripture is the doctrine response for which theological formulation and doctrinal argumentation are the hermeneutics matters.

For Thomas, the supernatural origin of the theological argumentation is a human-based on its principles. Its reliance is on development and elucidation and makes use of logical argumentation where it, at times, can make philosophical authorities use logic unlike the cases of the theologians who seem always to follow the scripts regardless of the stipulations. Thomistic principles do not allow for argumentation of the instruction where most of the transmission of the Scripture depends on the transmission of the same. However, most of the scriptural analysis tend to lose meaning, especially when the sacred doctrine gets drawn from certain presupposition. Benedict gives this predication based on logical analysis and perspective of the biblical contexts.

According to Thomas, there are facts and things that get scriptural treatment such as geographical, historical, and narrative details. These factors do not have to transcend reason. The things are essential to Thomas unlike in benedicts perspective where most of the things transcend reason. The only difference is that they need to be discussed from a technical point of view with more biblical proof within them. The details from Scripture refer to the designs, message, or actions of God. Thomistic approach presumes that the Scripture has inexhaustible sacred meaning where most of it is not superficial. One needs to dig deeper to get a real understanding for most of the factors without having to have a biased approach of the same.

Benedict holds that sense of a given scripture is engrained in its interpretation from the logical possibilities that it presents. Their reader needs to have a deeper analysis of the same to ensure that the facts are not left out. Thomas, on the other hand, alludes that the theological argument has most of its power ingrained in the last quote, and the literal sense of the Scripture is mostly on the theological argument. Despite Thomas and Benedict having varied perspectives on scriptural interpretation, they believe there is more profound sense to the scriptures that what first meets the eye.

Contrast the exegetical method and theology (inspiration) of Raymond Brown with the Patristic approach (outlined in the Barron article)

There is a growing consensus on the differences in scriptural interpretation where most of the arguments are between dogmatic theology and exegesis. The latter is seen as an interpretation of the technically trained experts in ancient philology and culture, whereas theology is characterized by the spiritual reflection that vaguely relates to the author's intention.

Over the last two centuries, the biblical interpretation has had a massive impact in the theologizing both the protestants and the Catholics. These distinct groups were able to adjudicate their disputes through the appeal of the sacred scriptures in the claiming of different religious contexts. The theological and exegesis approach of Raymond Baron has enshrined the literal sense of the scriptural text. He readily spoke of the various aspects of sensus plenior, which corresponds with what God wanted to communicate through the Scripture. Baron never developed his exegetical analysis of writing, leaving them all to the spiritual writers and theologians. The meaning of the Bible goes beyond what the authors meant from the surface. However, there seems to be an exaggerated bifurcation between theology and biblical context. For instance, if one would have asked Thomas Aquinas to give the distinction between his biblical analysis and systematic theology, it is easy to tell that he would be puzzled. There seems to be a sharp distinction between the two.

Brown insists that one should and can practice biblical exegesis with the ultimate focus on the intentions of the human authors. This approach is one-sided and violates both the asymmetrically and non-competitiveness of the Chalcedonian theologic. The early writers who make up the patristic approach are distinguished from the notion that is held by Baron. For instance, Dei Verbum emphasizes the vital importance of having to attend to the literary and authorial intention in the biblical interpretation. One is not supposed to have a more straightforward approach to the various interpretations regarding the exclusive preoccupation of the biblical hermeneutics. It treats the Old Testament in Irenaean spirit where the manner for most of the biblical interpretation is from extraordinary integrated manner. The great thinker in time tends to associate God with being a supreme being who distantly related to the world concerns. Some of the examples are Rene Descartes or Deists who primary employed metaphysics in their regarding God and creation. Often the terms nature of God would be used interchangeably. The interpretation of the scriptures for most of the early theorists was based on first environment interpretation. For instance, this is evident from the exegetical and theological work of Rudolf Bultmann who rejected the apologetic argument that prophecies and miracles grounded Christian claim truths.

Raymond Brown, on the other hand, analyses different writers who were studying Christianity and various elements around it. He studied early Christian writers and their perspective about the Scripture. Raymond Brown did this in different phases. He shaped much of the catholic exegesis and impacted hugely on the scholar and popular scripture interpretation. His methods were filled with the common exegetical perspective where a lot of the reasons included seeing the biblical texts as they are, taking on the literal meaning, the revelatory text, wider meaning of the biblical texts, and the church doctrine and biblical exegesis.

How is Topology Fitting

The fitness of topology is manifested in various ways. St. Gregory of Nyasa uses Moses' life as a model for spiritual perfection and growth. His treatment is in two parts. One, he uses the historical or literal sense of the life led by Moses, and two, he focuses on the typological or spiritual sense. St. Gregory refers to the topological sense as theoria to mean contemplation. It suits contemplation due to the salvation history mysteries. The Christian contemplations involve prolonged consideration of the faith ministries under the guidance of the holy spirit.

Topology is essential for contemplation and preaching. Topology fits and underlies the structure of sacramental action. The sacramental mysteriously put together the basic elements of time. That is the present of the church, the paschal mystery where there is a culmination of history, and the past salvation history. It also anticipates the glory of the future. The three temporal dimensions are discussed by St. Thomas of Aquinas in the Summa. The sacrament has the mysterious capacity of bringing together the past, the present, and the future in ways that are greater than the contemplation of man. The topological value found in the Old Testament reflects the sacramental action and prepares for it. The Fathers make the liberal use of topology in the interpretation of the Bible. Both the biblical and sacraments typology uses the natural human order principle of learning the spiritual realities through the use of sensible images. As such, it is fitting that human brought spiritual gifts and truths by using sensible signs.

Also, typology is fitting as it exhibits divine preparation and is a credibility motive. This aspect is mainly because it reveals the mysteries that are worth the divine wisdom. They reveal the providential plans of God in the human course of dealing with the Church and Christ. Biblical typology gives the divine bridge between the New and the Old Testaments. It is God himself who prepared the Old Testament religious events and ceremonies by making them symbols, signs, or figures of the new. The scriptures typological figures bind the two testaments and helps in understanding the knowledge and teaching of God. It is through typology that most of the things that are done in the Bible suit the corporal and sensible nature. Typology demonstrates the power and reality of the providence of God in humans.

Typology is also Christocentric to mean that it manifests its pivotal reliance on Christ. It connects the events that were taking place before and after Christ with the Paschal mystery and incarnation. Life after Christ closely associated with the incarnation. Typology always points to Christ before the church lives his life through the gift of the sacrament and the spirit. Also, it allows the Scripture to be Christocentric, although the literal meaning doesn't infer to Christ.

The Father also use Christ when they want to understand the Old Testament hidden mysteries. They do this by investigating the typological meaning of texts in the ways that were revealed by Christ. St. Paul, Jesus, and some of the apostles used this method. Biblical typology is crucial in understanding the essential church liturgy structure. The Biblical typology reveals the understanding that there that enhances the beauty that produces the intrinsic nature of the church and Christ.

Explain the four senses of Scripture, their importance and function, magisterial justification

There are different biblical interpretations of the thoughts of Scripture, according to St. Thomas of Aquinas. For instance, the distinction between literal and typological/spiritual senses are discussed where their differences are in deeds and words.

The literal sense of Scripture is that which has its meaning conveyed directly by words of the Scripture. Similarly, the literal (typological) sense of Scripture is that which depends on the deeds or the events that the word expresses. That means that the Scripture's words indirectly convey the spiritual sense of Scripture whereas being directly involved through the realities and events.

The literal sense is further divided into three division, i.e., allegorical, anagogical, amoral (tropological). These types of typological senses make up the Christian mystery, though distinctly. When typology prefigures Christ, the church, and sacrament, then it is allegorical. When it prefigures the Christian life in the moral and spiritual dimension, then it is said to be moral. Finally, it is said to be anagogical when it prefigures the triumphant of the church and the last things. As such, the four spiritual senses of the Scripture are lite...