Essay Example on Romantic Tale: An Analysis of Margret Atwood's 'Happy Endings'

The analysis of the "Happy endings" short story by Margret Atwood starts with its identification as a Romantic kind. The literacy analysis of the whole tale scoped with several parameters. It uses symbolization and how it is combined. The elements include details of the plot and organization. It also consists of characters and their development. It also includes the setting of the story, its theme, and the use of the language.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Happy Ending is a fictional type of story that employs the use of ingenious narrations figures to showcase the varying themes. It shows the themes of satire commentary in the self-genre. In line with this, it portrays the warming message, which is not the end of the matter in the relationships but is a process. This story is broken down into six sectors from A to F depicting a monumental structure to offer Margret`s message. It entails the adoption of the 2nd and 3rd person language to achieve the general detaching. It portrays the emotionless kind of a narrative giving an impression of self-reflection.

The plot offered in a synopsis format of two people, namely, John and Mary. These two in the Happy Endings story portrayed as lovers. The description in the monumental structure given that there was a first option, given as A. this first option referred to as the happy Ending. The happy ending option meant the couple who went into a hand in marriage must ultimately die together and that no one is left living between the two. The other option was the separate five sections in the monumental structure. It was from B to F, initiated in a more distinct format. Nonetheless, regardless of how the couple relationship was, it somehow ended by the described death in the happy ending options.

The idea in the sections of the Happy Ending story opened up the minds of the audience to elucidate that the story could be generated in more ways, but the end is converged to one factor, which is death. However, this isn't a finality since Margret has a considerable idea, which are the lovers getting apart. It meant two factors that will occur; divorce or a breakup. Margret is not, in one way or another, similar to the audience's perception of the Ending. It should be more conformed to how the relationship between the lovers will appreciate over time. So, for her to ensure that the message gets into the minds of the audience, she adopts two significant factors.

Adopting of 3rd person narrative view is the first factor adapted. The reason for utilizing this factor is because she wanted to establish some aspect of the detachment from John. She also detaches herself from Mary for the narrative without any single emotion. Margret showed the end of the relationship to the audience by stressing on the repetitive synopsis of the story enabling them to comprehend the pattern incurred. The justification of the above statement is the introduction of the characters who are John and Mary. Something distinct and somewhat strange is the fact that there is no single aspect of the character being developed. For the emotionless narrative, she uses this 3rd person language in the story; there is a removal of the internal kind of a monologue, any feelings.

Because a proper identity hasn't been developed in the characters, it becomes vital for the audience to perceive a real person throughout the storyline. The carrying out of the majority of the activities is following the traditional tales. It, however, does not comply with modern romance tales of the relationships among the characters. This aspect generates more of the picture created in six of the story transforms, which ultimately gets to what she says, "much for the endings. Beginnings are more of fun".

It is a considerable elucidation expounding over the text to the inspiration of readers of the life narrative. She also begins with second person perception. She addresses the readers that if they needed a happy ending, they should try the A option. A reaction to this is that there is a question of the owner of the "voice of God." The wall in the 4th position was never being broken all through the storyline.

Throughout the story, there is a consistent shattering of the available illusion. The illusion is the reader himself was included in the narrative. Margret used the effect to take the reader's attention, now to the real writing up of the story. It was in one way or another the challenge of the reader by her to include the write up such features as conventions genre and also the cliches entailed in the romance type of a narrative based on traditional ways. An instance is a character named James in the option C. He had to be the real lover "having a fabulous collection of record" as given in the story.

The last concept under this adoption is the interaction between the 3rd and the 2nd perspective. What has been established due to this factor is a feature of the traditional type of drama. It is a feature that could also be very romanceful. However, the 2nd person view portrays unamused, and a very knowledgeable attitude to the whole romance genre kind in the synopsis development offered in one cliche after the other.

The second adoption is majorly based on the 2nd person view. Margret had an intention to compel the reader to get into the text, like an immersive and considerable mindful session engagement to the story. In this format, the audience offered the illusion that they control the details in the story. The actual concept under this adoption is that the storylines are already written, showcasing that the ideas have prior planned endings. The fifth section substituted the text of the already existing parts of the plots. Examples of the phrases included, "you like, it can be, 'Madge'" and "guilty and confused."

Taking an instance that occurred in the story, we have Callahan. Callahan is pursuing her dream in the field of medicine. She ultimately determined that she wouldn't undertake the tasks posed to her when they were with Thomas, who was her lover. She also found out that she was surrounded by so many friends in her activities.

It could not have been the case if they had not adopted what Margret offers as the second opinion, that is, breaking up or the divorce to evade the first section, which is option A of the structure where the ultimate fate was death. They chose to break up, but they went and found partners somewhere else who were respectable. They also loved themselves despite this issue and sent themselves the Christmas cards.

After this, Margret said that they will still die. The fact that they will die won't mark the ultimate unhappy Ending to Thomas and Callahan. The Happy Ending was to be created by the fact that two lovers had gone through some worthless lessons and compelling experiences in once life.

Work cited

Cengage, Learning G. "A study guide for Margaret Atwood's "Happy Endings." Cengage Learning, 2016. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=EY6sDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT4&dq=%22Happy+Endings%22+by+Margaret+Atwood&ots=7afqeI-Bmy&sig=XiNR9oJUJRhlnFyOgkFDRIg4XKc&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Happy%20Endings%22%20by%20Margaret%20Atwood&f=false