Essay Example on Overcoming Internal Conflict: A Difficult but Necessary Journey

While conflict with others can be quickly resolved, a battle with oneself can be one of the most challenging experiences one can endure. Often most people who experience internal conflict end up feeling depressed due to the lack of help or avoidance of the same. Generally, most cases of such experiences are considered normal and usually affect the victims acutely. Nonetheless, there are cases where medically proven cases can cause internal conflict and affect a person's life, frequently leaving periods of dark times in an individual's life. In this context, there is often a debate on whether to revisit a person's dark times after healing, with proponents of the argument posing that revisitation of the actions of the subject usually helps them understand their past contributions to their healing. On the other hand, the opposition suggests that an individual revisiting their dark times often leads to the person relapsing.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Generally, proponents of reconstructing one's hard times usually believe that it is an essential process towards healing. They think that in revisiting the hard times, including those events that one does not remember. The notion rests based on understanding the root of the problem or the cause of the struggles that one has experienced. Dark tourism, in this case, referring to the visitation of one's dark times, is an encouraged activity even for individuals who have experienced traumatizing experiences.

Recuperation is the essential objective for individuals who have encountered an injury, their families, and their consideration suppliers. Recovery does not mean total opportunity from post-horrendous effects. Recuperation is an individual encounter and cannot avoid being and appear to be unique for everybody. When all is said in done, recovery is the capacity to live in the present without being overpowered by the contemplations and sentiments of the past (Prakash et al., 2016). The key to the experience of injury is defenselessness, confinement, and the loss of intensity and control.

The core values of injury recuperation are the reclamation of wellbeing and strengthening. Recovery does not mean total opportunity from awful post effects, yet, for the most part, it is the capacity to live in the present without being overpowered by the musings and sentiments of the past (Prakash et al., 2016). There is an active discussion in the field of horrendous worry with regards to in the case of returning to awful recollections is vital for mending or whether it might, in truth, even be unsafe. This is an individual issue; many may think that its useful to tell and retell their encounters of injury where others may locate that damaging to their prosperity.

Injury recuperation is ideal to be viewed as a procedure that is dealt with after some time and in purposeful stages. The restoring of security is the first and most focal advance in recuperation independent and separate from whether the subtleties of the injury are ever talked about or not. Inferring to the reasons presented above, it is indeed a proven fact that revisiting one's problems may contribute to the overall healing process of the person.

It is a common psychological practice for most trauma patients, including those suffering from post-traumatic stress disorders, to be put through a recollection process by the psychologists helping them. Typically, the process involves the patient trying to recall their experiences and talking in detail about how they felt as they engaged in the activities or events related to their conditions. In patients who have dementia or amnesia, the process may also include them being shown what they had done if they fail to remember.

Consequently, one acknowledges the effectiveness of such processes in the process of healing. The same notion is even supported by the fact that most cases have clinically proven to be successful in the healing process of the individuals who undergo such treatment processes. Moreover, the results have been published by accredited psychology experts who have tested and proven the efficiency of such practices.

Regardless of the efficiency of the clinical methods and the general process of revisiting one's dark moments in the process of healing, there still exists evidence of the negative impacts. Inside the last ten years, an expanding number of studies have analyzed qualities of automatic self-portraying recollections - that is, memories of individual encounters that strike a chord with no previous recovery endeavors (Ball and Little, 2006).

Automatic personal recollections in regular day to day existence are more frequently about constructive than pessimistic occasions (Berntsen and Hall, 2004) similar to the case for self-portraying memory all in all. In any case, intermittent automatic recollections (i.e., automatic self-portraying recollections that individuals emotionally experience as being tedious) have gotten no consideration outside of clinical settings. Clinically, such memories are seen among individuals experiencing Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

The DSM-IV meaning of this issue records various re-experiencing indications, including "repetitive and meddlesome troubling memories" and "intermittent upsetting dreams" of the horrendous accident. Because of the absence of research in non-clinical populaces, we have no information explaining whether intermittent automatic recollections of personal occasions are attached to awful and additionally contrary enthusiastic worry as contended in speculations dependent on clinical perceptions (Mace, 2007).

Further, a short reflection on the very thought of intermittent recollections should bring up various issues. Precisely what is implied by the possibility that memory is repetitive? Does it mean that each sporadic memory is precise of a memory of a similar occasion or scene? This would appear to conflict with the possibility that consciousness is reconstructive. The discussion concerning whether the demonstration of recollecting is a useful making of something new or an affiliated reactivation of put away and perpetual data has a long history in brain science.

Mace (2007), contended unequivocally against the empiricist position that tactile impressions are put away in fixed structures and later reactivated through affiliations: "no state once gone can repeat and be indistinguishable with what it was previously." A similar position was taken by Schacter (2012) who considered the possibility of perpetual reactivations of the equivalent put away material "so misinformed - that it merits a unique name." To this point, he picked the expression "Return Hypothesis," which suggests that "a similar memory picture, or another psychological unit, can vanish and return again and again."

Having established both perspectives of the conflicting stands of revisiting dark times, it is essential to as well as consider the middle ground between both sides. In essence, while the personal perspectives of both parties stand, one thing remains common for both views. While it may be wrong to revisit a person's struggles and traumatic experiences, it is as well crucial for their recovery (Prakash et al., 2016). Therefore, one acknowledges the relevance of revisitation for medical purposes and the benefit of the patient.

In Brain on Fire: My Month of Madness, Susannah Cahalan fights to change the events during her time of frenzy in which Susannah's twenty-four years of normality is suddenly lost rapidly. As her mindfulness and physical body are not, now, great, she isn't, now, prepared to get a handle on what she is doing, and along these lines can no longer grasp what she is ending up being. With all expectations and purposes, no memory of her exercises, Cahalan's self is separated, and she uses Brain on Fire to pioneer through her outing to reclassify her character. Because of the absence of control that Susannah has over her activities, Susannah utilizes words, for example, beast and outsider to depict the piece of her that she and her family more than once need to stand up to. Just by saying this, she infers how her disease made this negative outside that obstructed the 'genuine' Susannah from every other person, henceforth a different arrangement. Even though Susannah's passionate and physical prosperity depends on the help of her family, it starts to negatively affect her when it starts to appear "feel sorry for transmitting" from them.

There were scenes in the book that depicts Sarah's resounded encounters and despite the fact that she did not have memory of all. Parts where Susannah was attached to her emergency clinic bed and her endeavors to escape gives one the chills, as you imagine their family offering those equivalent occasions to them after waking up from a trance like state. For one, seeing Susannah and her family's battle to find solutions from specialists when they didn't have them helps one remember their own dissatisfactions and dread.

Conclusion

Conclusively, Brain on Fire provides an unorthodox approach towards understanding ailments. In this context, an autoimmune disease is explored with the author explaining herself how her experiences affected her life. While trying to fathom herself during this ailment, Susannah dives into the universe of puzzle and vulnerability that is her ailment. She needs to do so in light of the fact that she has lost a huge piece of herself with this sickness. She perceives that she can maybe never get it back, however, the columnist instinct in Susannah pushes her to face the challenge to endeavor to get and comprehend the pieces deserted.

References

Ball, C. T., & Little, J. C. (2006). A comparison of involuntary autobiographical memory retrievals. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 20(9), 1167-1179.

Berntsen, D., & Hall, N. M. (2004). The episodic nature of involuntary autobiographical memories. Memory & Cognition, 32(5), 789-803.

Cahalan, S. (2013). Brain on fire: my month of madness. Simon and Schuster.

Mace, C. (2007). Mindfulness and mental health: Therapy, theory and science. Routledge.

Prakash, J., Saha, A., Das, R. C., Srivastava, K., & Shashikumar, R. (2016). Post traumatic stress disorder. Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 72(2), 189.

Schacter, D. L. (2012). Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory. American Psychologist, 67(8), 603.