Essay Example on Climate Change: Impact on Human Behaviour and Long-Term Health

Introduction

I have experienced thoughts about how climate change influences human behavior in the short term. The long-term population’s good health relies on the consistency effective and stability of the environmental and physical methods in the biosphere, frequently denoted as life-support organisms. However, I have ignored this long-founded fact at my peril. Hitherto, it is easy to observe this reliance, predominantly at a period when the individuals are progressively detached and developed from these natural tactics. The biosphere’s climate system is a significant section of this life-supporting method, one of the numerous enormous natural approaches existing from the augmenting weight of economic actions and rational numbers. Still, the recent and hastening earth warming climate is mainly due to human performances, and mental procedures primarily facilitate the effects. They can be restricted predominantly by individual activities. Psychologists, as associates of rational and actions, society have gained relevant skills for comprehending how and why people act in methods that result in climate variation. Also, understand the psychosocial climate variation influences, and techniques to help society in reacting to contemporary and projected effects of temperature change through using various approaches to minimize impacts and performances to decrease the emission of greenhouse gas. Psychologist’s instructors should enhance more extensively shared knowledge of significant human phenomena related to the integration of climate change through contributing effectively in improving understandings and contexts of other disciplines.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Background

The climate and temperature of the earth have varied over the last decades. Over the previous centuries, human actions have forced the earth’s atmosphere out of the level within which human evolution industrialized in the preceding years; thus, warming is inevitable due to the visible components of the temperature system (Pachauri et al., 2014). Also, climate concepts simulate the effect of greenhouse emissions and other driving aspects on environmental features such as the average domain temperature. Longer-term forecasts depend on scenarios of imminent drivers, founded on norms regarding issues such as the impending human population size, economic development, degree, and attainment of mitigation determinations. However, the knowledge of the contribution of humans to contemporary warming is relatively clear. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s the activities and emission of humans have led to approximately 100% of the warming perceived since 1950 (Pachauri et al., 2014). There exist indirect climate change effects that directly impact humans and the environment, such as an augmentation in water and hunger crises, particularly in developing nations, health hazards through rising heat waves and air temperatures.

Thesis

An essential idea of this paper is that change in climate is a psychological phenomenon due to the biodiversity and geophysics and has influences beyond the biophysical. Thus tutors need to teach about the mental aspect of climate change in schools to equip learners with knowledge on the impacts that co-occur on various, instantaneous levels. Also, they should help students comprehend that psychologists have an ethical responsibility to take quick steps to diminish harm, discrepancies in climate influences, and frequently enhance their climate-related intrusions.

Argument

Numerous studies have shown how psychologists’ offer a hypothetically and empirically founded comprehension of human behavior at a distinct level. The analysis level is pertinent for understanding the specific reasons for the change in climate as it is the cooperative influence of the contributing factors of human behaviors to climate change. An individual evaluation level is significant for understanding the climate change impacts and the techniques people adjust to the changes as influences and coping responses comprise psychological responses, processes, and individual and interactive procedures (Clayton, & Brook, 2005). Defensive reactions to environmental variation may arise when valued social personalities are susceptible. For instance, when Americans experienced the situation of the usage of excessive energy in their nation, they possibly featured climate variation to fundamental reasons than when a similar fact was put forward regarding China. Besides, this is a more significant ascription to natural causes adversely linked with changes in climate issues and support for mitigation strategies. However, processes that aid minimizes identify hazards can enhance engagement with variations in temperature. Drawing on the literature of self-affirmation, it aids in reducing the denial level of climate modifications, and it encourages personal participation with environmental behavior and climate change. Determinations to enhance structural and mitigation transformations for adjustment to environment change will require to attend to the general public, decision-makers, and social groups. Psychologists can assist by offering relations between individuals and environmental policies by practicing to the methods that communities may respond against ecological strategies established by government officials.

Additionally, psychologists have long acknowledged the fundamental of the proximal and distal frameworks for identifying behaviors, and this is vital for environmental performances. The capability to attend to personal level evaluations and settings is essential to address the behavior of humans in various contexts wholly. A defining aspect of environmental psychology is the connection individuals have with their surroundings. Human behavior is the central contributor to changes in climate and happens through the utilization of services and goods that directly or indirectly results in bio-physical variations that impact the environment. Psychologists can aid people in intellectualizing a better comprehension of environmental analysts and economical consumption. A psychological analysis offers information on distinct consumption behaviors and concentrates on the activities that lead to changes in climate (Clayton, & Brook, 2005). The information aid decision-makers to establish strategies and stimulate structural mitigations for variations in climate since this modification would take numerous years to reverse. The effectiveness of a particular strategy requires the participation of individual behavioral support and change.

Psychologists have revealed interpersonal, individual, and social drives capable of shifting human activities that are not extensively comprehended. Although individuals seem competent to express their beliefs, opinions, and preferences precisely, they are weak at identifying the reasons for their behavior. Individual behavior on their consumption offers a critical connection between proximate conduct causes of climate modification and effects on such choices (Swim et al., 2011). Some of the individual consumption decisions predictors comprise core values, personal capabilities, motivation and beliefs, and motivations. Students have explored distinct individuals who need predictors to illustrate instances in which the behaviors of the household do not follow the economic benefit maximization models. These models describe why individuals and households fail to observe the cost-effective measures of energy-saving, which aid in minimizing climate degradation. In the world of energy consumption, for instance, individuals will regularly misconstrue the real causes of activities that enable or hinder their climate management determinations. The use of behavioral studies deploying both the non-experimental and investigational approaches, psychologists can recognize the actual factors of energy consumption actions. It can also highlight the aspects of communication movements to inspire individuals to act in more viable methods and to enhance energy preservation. Psychologists recommend strategies for appealing values that stimulate undertakings to the civic significance beyond those in personal self-interest (Swim et al., 2011). Also, psychologists have designed informative messages and informal networks that enhance social norms for contributing to restraining greenhouse emissions. It is made possible by observing organizational behaviors that hinder contributions to changes in climate and assist them in adjusting to formal or informal practices that inspire environmental participation.

There exist numerous contemporary and projected intrapersonal, interactive, and intergroup significances of changes in climate. Psychologists are well placed to plan, execute, and evaluate involvements to enhance the psychosocial influences of climate change. For example, vital service delivered to victims of life-threatening weather occasions such as Hurricane Katrina help in illustrating the psychological impacts. Hazards of climate variation threaten mental wellbeing and destroy the quality of life even in situations without direct consequences. The level to which societies and people experience these effects is through the contextual aspects. Intergroup rivalry and ethical issues regarding environmental justice may become more outstanding as ecological challenges construe through the climate change lens (Doherty & Clayton, 2011). The comprehension of the psychology of how ideas, principles, and philosophies patent on the group and personal levels can aid in illustrating and addressing emotional responses to the social justice concerns essential in climate variation impacts. Psychologist aid in planning and evaluating intrusions, which are practiced in minimizing the effects of climate change. Research by Nolan et al. (2008) reveals that utilizing experimental behavioral approaches can help to recognize decisions made by individuals that collectively impact contributions to changes in climate. Rivalry amid intergroup regarding environmental justice may minimize environmental challenges interpreted in the changes of climate aspects. Psychological processes can also assist in observing behavioral modification that may be disregarded and end up influencing individuals’ and societies’ preparedness to adaptive transformation due to the changes in climate.

Refutation

Moreover, research on psychology concerning changes in climate mitigation has concentrated mainly on the consumer role, treated choices as occur in a sociocultural vacuum, and highlighted fluctuations in numerous actions, like the utilization of equipment or household waste management. Such methods depend on the short time structure within which behavioral modification is more comfortable to document. The study has focused on change in a target performance, and not on transformation in the effect or climate outline of behavior. Research of adjustment in the high-impact of investments in the household is limited and theoretically uncoordinated (Stern, 2011). Although psychologists examine a different behaviors range, it seems that they regularly fail to reflect the target actions of technical potential (T.P.), numerous of the extensively analyzed ‘pro-environmental actions have low T.P.

Conclusion

Global climate change incorporates various strategies between interdisciplinary collaboration with social and physical sciences. Such associations and integrations mainly happen due to a common aim or necessity. I believe that in contemporary society, the changes in global climate is a shared difficult; however, it does not guarantee collaboration among other disciplines.