Essay Example About Hegel

Was Hegel an idealist? Or was he the most dedicated materialist of his time and ours?

The categories of different people being categorized as either idealist or materialist emerge in psychology describing people on how these individuals think. It is the question of how humans think and how such thinking can be used in practical effect.Hegel was absolutely difficult to get into his writing, however, him expounding the logic of explaining how people think. This is actually the science of thinking and the subject matte4r in here is actually idealism having virtually no impact on enormous value. We can categorically and fruitfully interpret Hegel's logic in a number of ways. Hegel did not consider thought-objects as subjective phenomena of individuals mindsets and thoughts. Philosophical idealism and philosophical materialism are quite different and very opposite camps.The question of thinking yielding a reflection of the material world or the other way round of objective world is a product of thought or maybe it's as a result of both that.Even in the study of nature and validity of knowledge materialism and idealism have definite meanings and Hegel's shows idealism manifesting itself over assumptions such as assuming that people do or act as they say and in fact most of the time people operate and act within a particular system of concepts and we do not question these concepts in which we operate on .Hegel, however, gave us a direction of criticizing the contents and concepts in which we operate on rather than limiting and restricting ourselves simply to what follows from that. Hegel views materialism being limited by the philosophical content of the concepts we use practically. Furthermore, its limited by the level of development of knowledge of science.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Hegel was indeed correct in coming up with a description of objective existence to logic and insisting that thought will always have an objective content.Hegel had actually a wonderful version of logic.He believes the main driving force behind everything is the logic and it governs everything.

Hegel's talking about the civil society and philosophy (Tester) of right in particularly touches on individuals or persons who are essentially related to others and each and everyone establishes him and finds satisfaction by means of others. In civil society, each in his own end and everything else is nothing.Though civil society universal has fallen apart Hegel views this as still reciprocally connected and connected together in some way.Any typical civil society according to Hegel has a kind of need and satisfaction and any animal need has a number of ways of satisfying them.There is a multiple of needs and it involves a check on desires.To add on this a factor of needs and satisfaction what is termed as comfort is actually something inexhaustible and illimitable therefore according to Hegel the need for greater comfort does not come from within you directly.

Moreover, Hegel sees any civil society in on the kind of labor in which raw materials needs to be worked on before man use, and therefore there emerges the class of the division in which particular man's resources are utilized. Therefore Hegel considers a subdivision of civil society into different branches very necessary where three classes of agricultural, business and civil servants classes emerge.

The concept of administration of law, in which it is through the working of a system that right becomes an external compulsion of protection of particular interest (Buck). Right as law -Hegel believes the law does not actually settle these ultimate decisions essential in actual life but actually gives room to judicial discretion.On top of that, the law determinately existent giving an implication that it has a binding force and setting laws in a notch higher beyond the mere citizens reach is considered injustice.And rulers who have the national laws to their people in a well defined and arranged manner have been considered greatest benefactors according to Hegel. He views the court of justice in taking right steps into the determination of what's is right or wrong and in contrast with the particular will and opening of the right. In civil society, universality is very important when dealing with human needs.Given good laws, a state or a nation can flourish.On the other hand, good laws will work best only in existence of excellent public authorities in terms of the police force and corporation that ensure actual attainment.

In Hegel's methods of phenomenology as considered in chapter 4 the following important points where drawn and considered.

a) First person plural-According to Hegel using our powers and observations made internally is actually a kind and impromptu theorizing (Hegel).In which the only conceptualized ideas can be put into reality and practicality.

b)The third person perspective-what is going on in their minds cannot be measured or verified though mental events exist and have effects but those effects will and cannot be studied by science and all these opinions will jump into one unwanted conclusion.

c) Heterophenomenological words and fictional words existence in which Hegel's views it as the existence of single coherent interpretation of the sequence of behaviors which does not establish the interpretation being true.There could also be claim also stating fictitious entities.

Generally, Hegel played important role in philosophical systems(Marx), where he was very ready to preach and spread philosophical reconciliation with reality.It is not because it came precisely to practical conclusions but it helped a great deal in the establishment of specific theoretical principles which are very important to any thinker who wishes to work out himself.Hegel gave birth to the use of scientific knowledge and behind all this is dialectics and Hegel see this as the universal irresistible force in which nothing can actually withstand.

Hegel was an absolute idealist and he taught that the only motive force to world development is found only in the final analysis of the power of the absolute idea.

Did Hegel get there first? See par. 189 in PR. Who is the more radical thinker, Hegel or Marx?

Marxism is the product of the collisions of German idealism and British empiricism, Hegel was the first person in the philosophy of right about the system of need(pg 189).Here Hegel talks about subjectivity and objectivity. Particularly the characteristic nature, the contrast between the universal principle of the will and the subjective needs. This brings objectivity issues such as the satisfaction by means of external factors which in this case are the products and the properties of other people compared to their arbitrary wills. Hegel tries to assert the political economy which is a science that starts from the view of needs and labor which tries to explain the mass relationships and the movements in their complexion and qualitative and quantitative characters. Out of the circumstances of the recent world, this science works on an endless point thus coming up with simple principles that guide. The principles come up with understanding which in turn this brings about the reconciliation in what is called the sphere of needs thus showing some rationality in this thing. Labor and efforts have become the intermediaries in this subjectivity issue. (Westphal, pg183)

Although Hegel contributed very much to the philosophical work, Karl Marx had some critiques towards his achievements. Indirect the German idealism which descends from heaven to earth the empiricism lead by Marx, do ascend from earth to heaven. From Marx dialect on materialism on history as a process of development through a conflict that involves a real conflict between economic classes but not ideas. In this Philosophy. Marx claims that he has turned Hegel on his head in the following ways:

• Materialism replaces idealism where we start from individual to particular. the empirical facts which are the modes of productions and the relation of the exchange of products.
• Basic Empirical facts are more regarded than ideas from the Laws and philosophical theories.the laws and religion and moral speculations tend to be a superstructure which is determined by sub structural concepts.
• As Hegel purely dealt with normative and ethical forms, Marx puts down this by his more descriptive works. He says that descriptive has the priority more than the ethical points and theories.
• Invisible hand explanations of history where history is the product of causal relations and class conflict which are not dialectical conflicts.
• Marxist dialectics focuses on historical progress as opposed to Hegel whose dialectics focuses mainly on ideologies.

From political sense, Marx says that materialism is what drives the battles between the master and the slave and not some ideologies from Hegel'sidealist state of freeing one's mind from oppression. Hegel says that the slave has to work through the process of trying to free his/her mind to unjust the actions of the master so as to in time overcome the master.

For Hegel, the dialectic method is a process of coming to realize self which is called self-consciousness while Marx believes that this dialectic as a method of analyzing history which purely takes place in a more material world.

In life, there are things we cannot run away with. They are basic needs or universal this is clothing, food, and drinks. The universal things are dependent accidentally on circumstances on the way they are satisfied. Soil fertility, for example, varies depending on the place. Harvest from farms varies yearly depending on climatic changes. Some people are industrious while others are indolent. Medley arbitrariness breeds comprehensive characteristics in its working owned. It is therefore followed by thoughtless and scattered necessity which enters it automatically. To know the necessary elements, the following is an objective of political economy, science being a recognition because it has an explanation of various accidents in the sphere. However, it is very interesting to find that various chains of events and activities lead to the same point. Various sphere of this action drop into groups. It affects others and is affected by others. The most important thing is the mutual intertwining of particulars. This is what a person expects least for the first time when everything looks like it should be given out basing arbitrarily on an individual. The events have equality to that of a solar system. Where it is displayed on eyes only on irregular movements. The laws, however, may have ascertained.

Although Marx rejects objectives the moral reality, His perceptions are the perception of elimination that of alienation, exploitation, and oppression. Mark rights ability to elaborate and explain in a descriptive manner. But he fails in this. His explanation and stand made use of universal ethical classes. From the max view, teleology is made of history and its aim is human liberation. This is Hegel's goal indeed. Liberation is understood as anti-individualistically. The past progresses dialectically by settling conflicts. Remember, Marx's explanation of the process is not Hegelian.

History progresses because of class conflict and not because of conflicts of ideas. Slave and free man, lord, and serf, bourgeoisie and proletariat.

The final step of the progression is specified. The elimination of bourgeois private possessions, where private possessions in the name of productions and elimination of bourgeois individualism to favor life being a species life.This includes ultimately weakening of the state.

Hegelian philosophy is reversed using empirical facts such as the methods of productions and...