Did Shakespeare Write All of the Plays Attributed to Him?

Date:  2021-03-03 08:16:55
5 pages  (1384 words)
Back to categories
logo_disclaimer
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.
logo_disclaimer
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

People have for many years been embracing the fact that William Shakespeare is the legend behind the many poems that have been attributed to him. No one had ever thought that Shakespeare might have a hand in the conspiracy to hiding the truth that another penned his works. The authorship of Shakespeare did generate some concerns back in times when Delia Salter, an American writer released a book by the name The philosophy of the plays of Shakespeare. It provided different forms of argument like that of Lord Francis Bacon taking part in the writing of Shakespeare's plays. However, if anyone takes the initiative of looking up to the different controversies that rose concerning Shakespeare and the plays attributed to him then it becomes so much easy to detect what is true and what is propaganda.

Furthermore, for every individual who takes time to read or even encounter with the works of Shakespeare can tell he wrote all the work though there is no prove to it yet. However, there other people who come up with titles declaring to be William Shakespeare. The first incidence falls on Mr. Shakespeare of Stratfords who is supported by four facts of being William Shakespeare. First, the name William Shakespeare appears in all title pages of his work. Second, Ben Johnson published a critical say in the initial folio where he referred to the poet as Sweet Swam of Avon. Also, there is another reference by Leonard Diggers, thy Stratford monument. Fortunately, also his fellow actors who are mentioned in his work pointed out that he was the writer in the folio. Meanwhile, also effigy on his monument implied the same thing of Mr. Shakespeare of Stratfords being a writer. Though, all the ideas bring enough supporting evidence to establish facts, yet they are still remaining to be problematic (Edmondson & Wells, 25).

Considering the first fact, it is not reliable to believe that the names printed on the title pages of his works refer to Mr. Shakespeare. It is because his name Shakespeare was spelled in different ways even after the publishing of most of his works. It is known that the name that appears on the works was always spelled uniformly although in other instances, it was hyphenated and it was a rare case in English names at that time. Professionals are yet to come up with explanations for the hyphenation. The name had no hyphen in other contexts like the business that were conducted in Stratford. However, the second fact of the initial folio that was published in a poem is not found to refer to Shakespeare as an author. Shockingly, the definition of a prominent poet would so much depend on vague evidence. No one had ever written a personal reference to Mr. Shakespeare when he was alive until his death when Johnson referred to him and only listed him as an actor (Hope & Holston, 8).

Many genuine professionals are not disturbed by the lack of unity, limited specifics as well as the unclear role of the Shakespeare fellow actors. Other people question why the folio is found to be straightforward and why the vast release of eulogies occurred after a prolonged silence following the death of Shakespeare. The portrait is today seen to imply a writer although it does not resemble the one that was formed in the 1600s. A sketch of the same in 1634 displayed a human with a drooping mustache with a grain stick with no writing materials or writings as depicted in today's monument.

In addition, if Mr. Shakespeare's case would be considered wisely then the problems in the area would not matter much. It is quite unfortunate that beyond these problems, no definite proof that Shakespeare was a prominent writer or rather was he the known poet-plight William Shakespeare. The little evidence that has rather been offered is also seen to be at odds with his being Shakespeare. There is no work in Shakespeare's hand that has at any time been found as he had his life divided between two places, London and Stratford, bringing out a circumstance that is comfortable to correspondence. In record, the only the only writings that may be termed his are the shaky and inconsistent signatures that are found on the legal documents including his will. Many other people believe that the grammar school in Stratford could offer a formal education that Shakespeare required to produce him on a trajectory conforming to the literary results. The works reveal an extensive idea of law philosophy, literature ancient and in the advanced history among others and not much that is known about Shakespeare in context to that account. The knowledge that is displayed in the works is believed to be the exclusive province of the upper classes and with all that, still no records can be considered to place Shakespeare among them. In other instances, no records show any payments received by William Shakespeare for writing or any secured patronage (Mark & Casson, 33).

The gap that is seen in Shakespeare youth in Stratford and his initial history in forms the period at which he really shined. Before the few records from the church, his twenty-eight years was considered lost. Fortunately, not many scholars who understand where Shakespeare got all the ideas he put on writing. According to the ancient perceptions, the author gained fame and was recognized as a writer. Contrary to this fact, there exists no proof that directly in- fluencies the public, not in writing or in person. However, there are also some reasons as to why most people doubt him writing all the works attributed to him. For instance, after his play was performed in the Essex rebellion, Shakespeare was never mentioned and that he was seen to remain silent after the death of Elizabeth. The issue is not that there are no documents for Shakespeare, but all of them are found to be non-literary. They bring out the portrait of an entrepreneur in films and a minor actor in London. There is though evidence that shows his records as a taxpayer, and he was once published for hoarding grain during the famine. Another strange theory about Shakespeare that brings doubt about his works is that he left his career in his late forties still holding intact his faculty. He then returned to the same market center where he originated and never wrote any play, poem or play. No known records can prove that he ever released a play in Stratford or that he was considered a poet. Most professionals have found vague relations between the life of the supposed author and the works (McCrea, 17).

There have been many controversies concerning whether Shakespeare had written all the works that are attributed to him. Different reasons have been given as to why other people believe that Shakespeare wrote all the plays attributed to him as well as others who think that he did not compose all of the poems. Many persons who have had an encounter with the works done by Shakespeare have developed feelings that he only claimed to have written the works although there are no records to prove it. One reason bringing the doubt is that the appearance of the name William Shakespeare in all the title pages of the works that have been done by the poet during his lifetime. Another is the case where Ben Johnson wrote a critical phrase in the first folio where he referred to the author as sweet swan of Avon, and another reference by Leonard Diggers, thy Stratford monument. If the case of Mr. Shakespeare were to be considered wise, the problems in the area would not matter much. According to the ancient perceptions, the author gained fame and was recognized as a writer. Contrary to this fact, there exists no proof that directly influences the public, not in writing or in person.

Works Cited

Bradbeer, Mark, and John Casson. Sir Henry Neville, Alias William Shakespeare: Authorship

Evidence in the History Plays. , 2015. Print.

Edmondson, Paul, and Stanley Wells. Shakespeare Beyond Doubt: Evidence, Argument,

Controversy. , 2013. Print.

Hope, Warren, and Kim R. Holston. The Shakespeare Controversy: An Analysis of the

Authorship Theories. Jefferson, N.C: McFarland & Co, 2009. Print.

McCrea, Scott. The Case for Shakespeare: The End of the Authorship Question. Westport

(Conn.: Praeger, 2005. Print.

 

 

 

 

 

logo_essaylogo_essay

Request Removal

If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal: