Code of Ethics and Political Perspectives - Essay Sample

Introduction

With advancements in technology and communication in the recent past, various professions saw the necessity of providing clear regulations regarding ethical aspects that arise with technology's continuous usage. The NASW code of ethics is mandated to provide guidelines for social workers' daily professional conduct. Ethics are an integral part of an organization since it entails the moral principles governing people's actions. This paper will provide a discussion in the form of a review of the NASW code of ethics and the political perspectives highlighted by Leighninger and Popple in their book Social Work, Social Welfare, and American Society.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The NASW Code of Ethics

The NASW code of ethics provides a guideline to the professional behavior of social workers. The code is subdivided into four sections: the preamble, purpose of the NASW code of ethics, ethical principles, and ethical standards. First, the preamble section provides necessary information concerning this code (Brill, 2001). The social work profession's central mission is enhancing human well-being and meeting the basic human needs, which the main focus is on empowering the vulnerable people in society. Social work focuses on environmental forces that contribute to, create, and address problems in people's lives. Social workers perform the duty of promoting social justice and social transformation on behalf of their clients. Clients in the social worker's context stand for communities, groups, families, individuals, and organizations. They also undertake the responsibility of seeking to enhance the capacity of people in addressing their own needs. Their mission is based on various core values such as competence, integrity, service, social justice, and the necessity of human relationships.

Secondly, the subsection is containing the purpose of NASW codes of ethics. Among the various objectives of the principle of ethics, they first identify core values on which their mission is based. Second, helping social workers identify essential considerations when there are ethical conflicts (Barsky, 2017).

Third, are socializing new practitioners in social work missions also, ethical principles and visions and standards, among others.The third subsection contains ethical principles. The ethical principles stipulated under this code are based on their core values, which are the necessity of human relationships, integrity, competence, social justice, dignity, and service, among others. Establishing the importance of justice, the ethical principle that can be developed is social workers' challenging social injustices. Under dignity lie the principles of social workers respecting the inherent worth of other people. Social workers treat each individual with respect and care, minding the ethnic, cultural, and personal differences. The different ethical principle is social workers usually recognize the significant benefit of human connections. This principle is based on their core value, which is the necessity of human associations.

Core Value

Basing on the core value of competence, there is an ethical principle which social workers observe, which is they practice within their areas of skillfulness and demonstrate their professional expertise. They are on the watch out to increase their professional skills and knowledge and its application in real situations. They aspire to contribute to the knowledge-based on their professionalism. Additionally, the ethical principle of social workers behaving in a trustworthy manner is based on integrity as their core value.

Various ethical standards are crucial to the professional tasks of social workers. The set standards focus on first, the ethical roles that social workers undertake in the community. Secondly, are their roles as professionals. Third, their co-workers' ethical roles include respecting others, collaboration, confidentiality, consultations, and taking adequate strategies for correcting the unethical conduct of their fellow workers. Fourthly, are their moral duties in the practice setting.Chapter 2 of Social Work, Social Welfare, and American Society, written by Leighninger, and Popple, Addresses the political perspectives and social welfare issues. Social attitudes, political viewpoints, and ideology describe a collective mindset, which refers to a cohort's values and beliefs, which are structured adequately to have an impression of universality that is a worldview (Leighninger, & Popple, 2008). Attitudes and ideology are idiosyncratic; they tend to reflect how an individual perceives the globe and not the world's actual existence. Social attitudes show the psychological alignment of people to their social surroundings.

Political Perspectives

Political perspectives are broadly categorized into conservative and liberal. The majority of the people in the United States usually classify themselves in one of the groups. Additionally, to this broad classification, there are other perspectives: first, progressive outlook, a view linked to the old label of radical that has been labeled by writers as a small. it is a most refreshing stream of thought in the U.S.'s life at times; this perspective is regarded as "far left (Leighninger, & Popple, 2008)." Additionally, there is a "far right," alt-right, populist, or tea party perspective, which is an exciting variety of the conservative standpoint. Last, moderate philosophy, which can be regarded as non-perspective since it perceives the reality of social welfare matters, transforms based on the political point of view within which they are perceived.

In the USA, the Democratic Party is regarded as liberal while the Republican Party is considered conservative. The democrats stand at the left spectrum of politics while republicans at the right. According to Kerlinger, there is no distinction between Republicans and Democrats in the USA. There are distinctions between the two majorly in policies that impact social and business welfare (Kerlinger, 1984). They have a different perception of politics.

In my perspective, I would prefer liberalism and vote democratic perspective since it favors the majority of welfare legislation, it holds to the idea of social and racial equality for all genders, and it tends to social action. A liberal political perspective is crucial, especially for those who see the necessity of helping others and being community problem solvers.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the NASW code of ethics is continuous, regarded, and accepted globally for social and ethical practice. This code of ethics provides a set of principles, values, and standards as guidance for decision making and daily conduct of social workers professionals. The legend of ethics is divided into four sections, each dealing with distinct aspects. The areas are preamble, which provides a summary of the social work profession, including their core attributes and mission—secondly, the section highlighting the purpose of the NASW code of ethics. Thirdly, ethical principles which are based on core values, and lastly, ethical standards, which are a guide to the ethical standards of social workers.

Social attitudes, political perspectives, and ideology describe a collective mindset, which refers to the values and beliefs of a cohort that are structured adequately to have an impression of universality that is a worldview. In my perspective, I would prefer liberalism and vote democratic perspective since it favors the majority of welfare legislation, it holds to the idea of social and racial equality for all genders, and it tends to social action.

References

Barsky, A. (2017). Ethics is alive! The 2017 NASW Code of Ethics: What's new. New Social Worker. Retrieved from http://www. social worker. com/feature-articles/ethics-articles/the-2017-NASW-code-of-ethics-whats-new.

Brill, C. K. (2001). Looking at the social work profession through the eye of the NASW Code of Ethics. Research on Social Work Practice, 11(2), 223-234.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/104973150101100209

Kerlinger, F. N. (1984). Liberalism and conservatism: The nature and structure of social attitudes (Vol. 1). Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Incorporated.

Leighninger, L., & Popple, P. R. (2008). Social work, social welfare, and American society. Allyn and Bacon. https://katv.pw/download-social-work-social-welfare-and-american-society.pdf.