Cisco vs. FireEye: Who Offers Best Consistent Corporate Cyber Threat Security? - Essay Sample

Introduction

Who offers the best consistent security services? Who is the world's largest supplier of networking equipment? Who owing to principal investments over the years, both Cisco and other providers such as FireEye offer a robust portfolio of corporate security solutions (Lewis, 2019). In this post, we're going to figure out how they match up against each other when it comes to consistent corporate cyber threat security.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Both companies have been aggressively sucking up smaller businesses to round off their information security offerings. In Jan of this year, FireEye grabbed iSight Partners to extend its threat capabilities (Lewis, 2019). It followed several other essential acquisitions, including the purchase of Mandiant in 2014, a move that provided FireEye with an enterprise detection network and enhanced threat information for its current product line. In the context of these practices, how do the strategies of the two companies perform when it comes to defending firms from cyber-attacks?

Capability Set

Both are pioneers in their particular classifications yet FireEye centres solely on giving digital security arrangements. Conversely, Cisco plays in the vast space of systems administration and electronic interchanges and approaches security as a necessary part of every one of its contributions. Its guideline stratagem for improving product offering security has been vital acquisitions, instead of designing in-house. For instance, its ASA-arrangement NGFWs are vigorously strengthened by its progressed malware insurance, FirePOWER Services, and Next-Generation Intrusion Prevention System all previous Sourcefire items currently coordinated with Cisco's questions.

Ease of Use

FireEye's NX-arrangement gadgets are direct and straightforward to set up by administrators, system admins, and organize managers. Cisco arrangements require more mastery to convey and oversee. For instance, capability with the CLI is prompted for those arranging and sending its Adaptive Security Appliance line of items. And keep in mind that Cisco offers a disentangled GUI-based firewall machine administrator-the Adaptive Security Device Manager, it is mainly suggested for little or necessary arrangements. Additionally, remember that ASDM is written in Java and could at last effect the security stance of the gadget.

Community Support

Both Cisco and FireEye's security items are experienced contributions with sizable client bases over the globe. Network backing and assets are hence ample: FireEye keeps up its locale entrance while Cisco's Community holds an abundance of help and experiential information. Furthermore, plenty of outsiders kept up network sites exist to discover answers for increasingly extraordinary issues.

Release Rate

The two sellers' answers are persistently refreshed and fixed-this isn't amazing given the sheer number of establishments over the globe. Cisco is helpless before more significant market powers than Fire Eye with regards to discharges and item practicality. For instance, clients utilizing the famous Cisco PIX Security Appliances were encouraged to relocate to the Cisco ASA 5500 Series, as the previous is never again bolstered.

API And Extensibility

Cisco offers a very well-documented REST API for building customized programs to install and control individual Cisco ASA firewalls. Administrators can access existing setup data and request new configuration criteria using standard HTTP technologies. Similarly, FireEye offers APIs for most of its services, as well as API functionalities to 3rd-party security information providers.

Third-Party Integrations

Both Cisco and FireEye goods are widely incorporated with 3rd party solutions for scaffolding the layered, continuous safety framework of the organization. This includes integration with conventional SIEM systems such as Splunk, security incident management platforms, and software distribution controllers such as Citrix's NetScaler ADC.

Learning Curve

After years of rivalry between two, FireEye has often been a speculated takeover option for Cisco - in reality, rumors about Cisco's intentions to acquire the security provider has emerged earlier this year.

Conclusion

In conclusions, the lost profits and rapidly declining stock prices - at least partially due to recent crucial flaws found in FireEye's security solutions - make it a prime buyout prospect. No matter how broad or fragmented the company's network is, UpGuard's cyber protection program will offer this credibility assurance in all systems - security appliances, switches, IoT appliances, mobile applications, and more.

References

Alaba, F. A., Othman, M., Hashem, I. A. T., & Alotaibi, F. (2017). Internet of Things security: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 88, 10-28. Retrieved From https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084804517301455

Al-Janabi, S., Al-Shourbaji, I., Shojafar, M., & Shamshirband, S. (2017). Survey of main challenges (security and privacy) in wireless body area networks for healthcare applications. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 18(2), 113-122. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110866516300482

Lewis, T. G. (2019). Critical infrastructure protection in homeland security: defending a networked nation. John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from