Case Study: Domestic Violence

Introduction

The victim involved in the case was Ed, she dates Troy but lives together in last five years. They are both infantry soldiers possessing several weapons in their house. Ed was referred by the physician to the service agency of adult protective (APS) for being a victim of bullying, physical assault, and being abused and neglected. It is revealed that the two lives together for some years too, and are as well both lively service duty members in the American Army. On the other hand, Ed has served for long, and according to U.S army services, terms and conditions are almost to retire and therefore, he is set to adopt a child. Thus, because Troy came from his very last operation, is said to have been more belligerent than normal. In the earlier period, Troy could push hard Ed, hit the wall next to him as well as spit on him although there would be nothing staid. Given the fact that after he returned from the operation, Troy has punch Ed with an unbolt fist as well as choked him on several occasions not limited to two. Every time, Troy is regretful and requests Ed to remain patient with him. But on the other hand, Ed is frightened and very much concerned such actions shall get worse maybe. Troy and Ed are infantry soldiers. Thus they possess several weapons in their house. Ed is more worried about adopting a child due to worrying characters of Troy. However, the report collected shows that, Ed is the victim of the entire menace.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The Value, Ethical, Diversity, Personal Reactions in The Case

Troy and Ed reveal that they have been dating for a couple of years probably five years and they live in the same home. Troy, he on runs to adopt a child, but Ed is against his idea. Ed admitted their home environment could not favour them to have a child due to worrying conducts of Troy. These conducts are reported immediately after Troy's last deployment and thus, because Troy came from his very last operation, is said to have been more belligerent than normal. But nothing Ed could do since in her culture she must respect Troy even if she is also well trained same as him where she can have self-defend. This is because it is against their culture for a woman without a child to have a hard push with the partner since it is treated as a very serious taboo. Troy has punch Ed with an unbolt fist as well as choked him on several occasions not limited to two. Every time, Troy is regretful and requests Ed to remain patient with him. The report indicates that Ed believes that Troy is just besieged with the anxiety of adopting a child (Black, Basil, Breiding, Smith, Walters, Merrick & Stevens, 2011). Being caseworker of the APS, Ed's fear is explored in which she approves having strapping family values that have contributed to feelings of bewilderment over her protection as well as her conflicting values of defending her life over rough handling of her partner.

In addition, Ed posse's strong religious beliefs which could never admit being divorced due to it are a sin as she understands the nature of their worker. Ed reports that she recognizes an adopted child in the sanctity of marriage only if they also have their own and above all, an adopted child should come when there is a good environment to live. Ed still loves Troy and will stay around, but she does not like actions of Troy that makes her at all times being afraid. In the earlier period, Troy could push hard Ed, hit the wall next to him as well as spit on him although there would be nothing staid. Given the fact that after he returned from the operation, but on the other hand, Ed is frightened and very much concerned such actions shall get worse maybe. However, there are some challenging factors which surface at the moment of the entire case is the patriarchal formation influencing Ed, the victim, not properly providing a well-fitting environment to have a child. But making the matter worse is that, Troy and Ed are infantry soldiers. Thus they possess several weapons in their house. Ed is more worried about adopting a child into such home setting as being proposed by Troy. Thus the issues might adversely affect the victim's ability engaging in any given support services, as well as quitting the relationship. Thus it prudent as APS caseworker to offer resources founded on the needs of the victim but furthermore considering religious and familial values (Lockhart & Danis, 2010). Additionally, another imperative element is to educate Ed is that being patient as a woman of a family earns respect and dignity which uphold societal and family values

Creating Adequate, Safe Environment

On the other hand, as caseworker of service agency of adult protective (APS), there is a necessity of developing a safety plan immediately when finding out a very safe setting that assists in identifying all possible risk factors. Thus a very secure atmosphere to discuss the issue and formulate proper safety plane is at the church in the guiding and counselling room. This is because Ed says that, Troy came back home from his last deployment. Therefore, this can happen at home. Troy will be angry if he learns that we are discussing issues without his consent (Messing, Campbell, Sullivan, Brown & Patchell, 2017). Therefore, as a result, Ed and I thought it was most excellent when we met at her church where we will be provided with a very silent atmosphere where Troy will not discover. This assisted Ed to feel deemed it safe and offered a profound sense of safe location because we were in her church where she was more comfortable as well as more recognizable.

Theoretical Approach

The most important theoretical approach after failing to being a child at home and failing to be a strong women who can decide fate of her young family as the second in command, by not defending herself as one type was an infantry soldier, it was affirmed to use an approach of empowerment as well as survivor-centered approach. This is because an approach of survivor-centred focuses on the strengths as well as the safety needs of the older individual, and by so doing, will be recognizing despite gender diversity, one can best evaluate his/her own risk and safety. By using, empowerment technique, we shall either discourage or encourage the victim to remain in the relationship; thus by advising her, Ed will be capable of making informed decisions after have known all dynamics of abuse as well as the resources to be provided for supporting (Breiding, 2014). This will see her gain her lost glory and become stabling black and an icon that makes decisive choices without external pressure of quitting her relationship at any cost.

Risk Factors

Risk Factors behind domestic mistreatment later in life always create threats to the survivor. In Ed's situation, the partner generated various forms of risks such as physical, family risks. Tory has been physically abusing Ed by hitting and pinching her. The perpetrator created family risks by attacking her family values since he opposed her to adopt a child and creating the unfavorable environment for a young child and wife to live. In Ed's scenario there are three life risks generated, and these are financial, physical and living location. Ed after completed her duties as infantry soldier she stays at home taking care of herself. Her situation of living is as well a risk since she lives with the abuser. If Ed chooses to continue in her relationship, she is at the menace of having long-term psychological violence effects including anxiety. But when Ed chooses to run off the relationship, then she creates the risk of lacking financial support.

A Safety Plan

Lethality during the church meeting, we were two APS caseworker, and we guarantee screen for lethality. We determined to create a formidable individual safety plan using questions such as; does he have contact with weapons? Has he ever threatened to kill you? Has he physically abused you seriously? For Ed, lethality was an authentic issue since Troy has ever threatened to kill her, he can access to weapons since both were infantry soldiers and they have some weapons in their home, although she Lethality Screen, to be created for field practitioners. Safety Plan in staying in such relationship, Ed and APS caseworkers discussed the following: 1) recognize one neighbour who will be confiding the abuse by calling cops. Ed identified her next-door neighbour Emily. 2) Have a bag packed with money, documents, clothes that can be carried in a hurry. 3) Ed attends a support group in church to ease her situation. But if Ed was to quit her relationship, the APS caseworkers and Ed discussed that: 1) Ed moves to a nursing home 2) Pertain caregiving services which will help her at home. 3) Apply for disability benefits to access income. 4) Attending church support group for guiding and counselling. 5) Apply for APS benefits.

Conclusion

To advocate for Ed in the course of action, it is prudent that the ethical principles have to be applied to the latter. Also, to be competent, there is a need to have precise resources like shelters, financial and health resources. Consequently, is as well significant for having integrity particularly when working with an entire population which has been ever abused as well as their faith in loved ones who are the perpetrators is wavering. We as well require being aware of decorum and worthiness of an individual. To perform all these, then the respect of the decision of such a survivor demanding to stay with her perpetrator should be respected (Perez, Johnson & Wright, 2012). Additionally, there must offer services to the batterer seeking to give help free of charge. We need to make a guarantee that, there is a support group as we eliminate issues of isolation. Addressing social justice by educating the entire community of signs of close partner violence, advocating for the whole population is prudent.

References

Black, M. C., Basil, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., & Stevens, M. R. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 19, 39-40.

Breiding, M. J. (2014). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization-National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, DC: 2002), 63(8), 1.

Lockhart, L. L., & Danis, F. S. (2010). Domestic violence: intersectionality and culturally competent practice. New York: Columbia University Press.

Messing, J. T., Campbell, J., Sullivan Wilson, J., Brown, S., & Patchell, B. (2017). The lethality screen: The predictive validity of an intimate partner violence risk assessment for use by first responders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(2), 205-226. Doi: 10.1177/0886260515585540

Perez, S., Johnson, D. M., & Wright, C. V. (2012). The attenuating effect of empowerment on IPV-related PTSD symptoms in battered women living in domestic violence shelters. Violence Against Women, 18(1), 102-117. doi:10.1177/1077801212437348