Boeing Not Responsible: Crashes, Mechanic Failures & Pilot Errors - Essay Sample

Introduction

Boeing is not responsible for the crash of aircraft, but it was just a recurring unfortunate phenomenon for pilots. Assistance equipment which is highly effective is always installed to avoid errors made by pilots, especially in incidences like climbing shortly after taking off (Deutsche, 2019). But when this system is faulty, they always become fatal. The crash could have resulted due to mechanic failure to repair the aeroplane sensor, or it could be a result of the refusal of the mechanics to release the plane after the incidences becoming normal during the previous flights. In any occurrence of the crash, people have responsibility for errors that happen.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The one test pilot's concern and one engineer's statement was enough to lead Boeing planes to ground before the crash because the mistakes had started over the past decade (Campbell, 2019). Boeing was found flat-footed when its rival Airbus launched a fuel-efficient plane and rushed to complete 737 Max for it to market it quickly. During the development of Max, Boeing touted them to be the marketing point for airways besides of cutting corners. As much the 737 Max had the same features as the predecessors, pilots needed at least two and half iPad training of flying the newly launched plane.

The government deregulation of giving more authority to Boeing to regulate itself led it to take short cuts that eventually resulted to safety issues because Boeing allies facilitated the crafting of the legislation that made them overcome regulators' criticism (Kitroeff, & Gelles, 2019). Boeing could now carry out their activities without concerns from the public which raised warnings from the Federal Aviation Administration stating that safety measures were not in good interest. The F.A.A. powers remained to intervene when an incidence of the plane crash has occurred hence being denied the power of setting pre-safety measures on manufacturing companies. It was few weeks after the implementation of the law that the Boeing plane involved in a crash and the F.A.A. could now intervene because the incidence has happened.

The ethics of Boeing and their business if the fired C.E.O. walks out with $62 million says that the fired C.E.O. will not receive severance pay on the 737 MAX crisis (Shepardson, 2020). The C.E.O. was fired as a result of Boeing failing to withstand the fallout of fatal crashes, and the compensating figure was issued as a way of clearing the old C.E.O. and paving in ideas for the incoming C.E.O. Boeing decided of firing its C.E.O. because the company had been grounded down following the second plane crash and the speculations of firing the C.E.O. had circulated around the industry for several months.

The Federal Aviation Authority says that it was evaluating to find out if Boeing needed to fix a flaw on its newly designed automated control system which had been introduced (Gates, 2018). The F.A.A. also looks into the technical data and pilots' training if they were adequate to the provided transition of skills of pilots to the new jet. Flight expert believe that without enough skills over the new system was likely to confuse pilots during their flight. The F.A.A. spokesperson noted that the angle of attack had been used by most of the policies, and they were being reviewed including the flight control, air data and stall warning over the safety measures.

References

Campbell, D. (2019, May 2). The many human errors that brought down the Boeing 737 Max. https://www.theverge.com/2019/5/2/18518176/boeing-737-max-crash-problems-human-error-mcas-faa

Deutsche Welle. (2019). Boeing crash: Can machines make better decisions than people?: D.W.: 15.03.2019. https://www.dw.com/en/boeing-crash-can-machines-make-better-decisions-than-people/a-47920904

Gates, D. (2018, November 15). F.A.A. evaluates a potential design flaw on Boeings 737 MAX after Lion Air crash. https://www.seattletimes.com/business/boeing-aerospace/faa-evaluates-a-potential-design-flaw-on-boeings-737-max-after-lion-air-crash/

Kitroeff, N., & Gelles, D. (2019, October 27). Before Deadly Crashes, Boeing Pushed for Law That Undercut Oversight. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/27/business/boeing-737-max-crashes.html

Shepardson, D. (2020, January 11). Boeing's ousted C.E.O. departs with $62 million, even without severance pay. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-boeing-737-max-ceo-severance/boeings-ousted-ceo-departs-with-62-million-even-without-severance-pay-idUSKBN1Z92DQ