Introduction
This article examines President Donald Trump's unique style of speaking and how the audience receives it. It explores his linguistic approach to the style and the essential role played by language and power in politics. A significant concern in the article is the inability of Trump to compose a coherent conversation which makes it for the audience to understand what message is intended. The author of this article argues that Trump's talks are never complete and keeps hopping from one thought to the other without having completed the previous one. Trump's conversational style which is often full of shrugs and raised eyebrows to allow the audience to reach their conclusions has worked out effectively since the audience leave the venue feeling like they had conversed casually with him.
However, many linguistics have argued out that Donald Trump's speeches are neither meant to be read or utilized for sound bites (Golshan, 2017). This makes him so frustrated with how he faces the media due to his incoherence in spoken and written language. This claims in this article correlate to those of the original article in that they reveal the disconnectedness of the language used by the American President. Moreover, his overall vocabulary depicts grievous vagueness which in turn portrays his intellectual incompetence.
The author of this article is responding linguistics who are concerned with the incompetence of President Trump in language mastery. This is because, in his conversations, Trump goes off topic often more than any overage person. For this reason, he stands out for many linguists. His disorganized sentences coupled with the short snippets give a clear picture of how his minds operate. Moreover, the speeches composed and presented by Trump reveal an individual with short span attention, scattered thoughts and a lack of analytical skills and intellectual discipline. The President's use of fractured and unfinished sentences as well as is the inappropriate use of words are key concerns for linguists.
This article is intended for public speakers in America. This is because of the document President Trump's style of speaking to the public audience through the media and also campaign rallies. According to the article, Trump's conversational style is very poor when approached from a linguistic point of view. His speeches are made of fractured and incomplete sentences which give the audience the space to come to their conclusions. Grammatically, the ability of Trump to construct a correct sentence without grammatical errors is an impossible mission. Despite the vagueness of his vocabulary, his speeches show a conversation language rooted deeply in the oral culture which he uses to rally people through impassioned targeted conversation regardless of it following a clear arc (Golshan, 2017). His style allows the audience to finish the sentences for him.
For public speakers, the mastering of public language crucial to capture the attention of the audience. The construction of sentences should follow a certain structure to avoid the use of disordered language for addressing the mass public. This ability to compose a catching and decisive speech stems down from the ability of the speaker to organize their thoughts before conveying their speech. This strategy avoids the outbursts of nouns phrases, sudden departures from the theme, memory flashes, self-interruptions and odd side remarks amid your speech. Moreover, this article talks about how Trump applies his salesmen tactics to make his speaking style appealing to his audience. These uses of phrases such as "believe me" and "many people are saying" lure audience into believing baseless or false claims by the speaker (McWhorter, 2016). This is a tactic sued by many public speakers and most politicians when they are giving uncertain promises to their supporters.
The author of this article applies ethos and pathos as his rhetorical strategies to create a better understanding of the text to the readers. Some of the pathos include the interviews and rallies that have involved President Trump. The use of these interviews evoke the emotions of the reader to figure out the intended purpose of the story. These interviews create a picture to the people and the audience on the unique speaking style of President Donald Trump. For instance, the first interview after the president-elect gained victory in the United States elections. The opening remarks made by the interviewee suggest that he is not an organized speaker. In his attempt to respond about the nuclear deal by Russia, he interrupts himself with a lot of unnecessary discussions about his uncle's education and other topics which hinder the delivery of a simple message (Golshan, 2017). All he intended to say was that nuclear was a bad deal for the United States of America.
Moreover, interviews create emotions. In this article, people understand Trump on emotional levels. In his speeches, Trump repeats phrases and adjectives not just because he needs to stall time. This repetition of phrases aims at strengthening and creation of an emphasis on the association. For instance, the author asks," Is he reading cognitive science?" this is a rhetorical strategy used to mean that the repetition of phrases is intended for a different purpose rather than what people think. Through the use of a salesman language, Trump can sell his ideas about stopping the ISIS (McWhorter, 2016). He further applies the use of emotional appeal to address real issues such as terrorism, joblessness, and worries of the US losing its status as a powerful outfit. Through these emotions, the audience is made to express that fear through anger.
This article generally relates to the article studied earlier in various ways. First, the article agrees that Trump's conversational style is unique and thus his speeches are incomprehensible to a majority of the audience. Both articles agree that the US president is not a keen speaker and thus his thoughts are scattered. His sentences are also fractured and unfinished allowing his audience to make their conclusion out of resonance.
In this particular article, Trump's speeches are perceived as incoherent and thus not meant for reading or use for sound bites. This fact frustrates him making him face off the media and refrain from interviews. On the other article, the followers of the president perceive him as a direct shooter who tells what is in their mind. However, through this tragedy in language, he communicates to the world that whatever is on his mind is very little. Moreover, his casual way of doing things makes him unfit for handling national issues that demand diplomatic relationships. The first article criticizes his love for the 'doing' word which depicts his prowess in business dealings (McWhorter, 2016). For instance, his colloquial doing of Brexit results from a 'dealing' which leads to the assumption that he is unable to grapple with the state's complexities.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the blindness of Trump's adult-level composition has since been repeated in several articles such that it has almost been described as a normal thing. His grammatical errors and disorientation of his thoughts speak loud about his intellectual incompetence. Most of his speech compromise the English language rules with spelling and poorly structured sentence. This proves the idea that the US president cannot construct correct English sentences. Moreover, the lack of formalism in his language to address the audience is a point to criticize. He values relationships that are good to himself rather than those that are productive to the state.
References
Golshan, T. (2017). Donald Trump's Unique Speaking Style, Explained by Linguists.
McWhorter, J. (2016). Trump's Typos Reveal His Lack of Fitness for the Presidency. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/01/what-trumps-typos-reveal/579919/)
Donald Trump's strange speaking style, as explained by linguists. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/2016/8/18/12423688/donald-trump-speech-style-explained-by-linguists
Cite this page
Article Analysis Essay on "Donald Trump's Unique Speaking Style". (2022, Dec 07). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/article-analysis-essay-on-donald-trumps-unique-speaking-style
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- Film Capitalism: A Love Story Essay
- Research Paper on Feminism and Marxism in the Brave New World
- One Woman, One Vote Documentary Essay
- Do We Need a Common Identity?
- Essay Example on Ethiopia: Scarcity-Driven Challenges in Rural Areas
- US Strategy in the Sahel Region: AFRICOM Workbook Analysis - Research Paper
- Essay Example on Police, Charter of Rights: Upholding the Law of the Land