Article Analysis Essay on Criminal Justice

Introduction

In essence, the topic of ethics in criminal justice has been a debated issue in recent years. Apparently, ethical questions have risen across various fronts regarding the actions of individuals charged with the exercise of power over nationals, law enforcers, as well as public authorities, and are seen to be losing their grip on accountability. Roger Gherson's piece focuses on one, Judge Majid. Justice Majid of the immigration was under fire after a tribunal confirmed his failure to meet standards that the 'big' seat calls for (Gherson, 2017). The article sheds light on the sets of institutions and practices charged with upholding order socially, criminal justice, and ethical dilemmas that are likely to interfere with fairness on both large and small scales.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Primarily, maintenance of ethical standards in the justice system entails treatment of each case with even levels of impartiality while at the same time putting civil rights of individuals at heart. Despite the tribunal being at par with Judge Majid being blind, the article objects that disability ought to not impair one's ability to apply the law to the latter. This is a clear example of ethical dilemmas that face the criminal justice system. Making sound choices is no walk in the park especially in such a system as the author indicates, a couple of times the matter at hand is not clear-cut.

The immigration judge had been found to be lacking knowledge of the requirements of the immigration laws? Does this relate to a disability? A set of three judges looked into thirteen of cases the judge handled, unusually, a large number of these cases were appealed and went through. More to the findings of the tribunal was that the appeals were comparable to each other thus giving ground around which the author operates (Gherson, 2017). He is against the prolonged period of time that is likely to be taken in handling the appellate cases which may end up impeding or preventing justice from being served.

The author goes far and beyond in highlighting that the cases successful appeals coincidence is not enough to warrant much scrutiny on Judge Majid, instead the focus ought to have been on these appellate cases so as to put the matter to bed once and for all (Gherson, 2017). The outcome of Judge Majid's examination was that he wholly failed to meet the standards as required by the office of a judge. Majid was accused of failing to provide ground and reasons for his decisions but at least had awareness of the requirements of Immigration rules.

In line with the understanding of the article, in his cases, Judge Majid focused on conviction rather than justice. Prosecutors are probable victims of ethical dilemmas similar to the judge's case. A key step to resolving such cases involves following laws to the latter while at the same time thinking through on a course of action. The tribunal, for instance, seemed swayed by the judge being blind but in the long run, this did not hinder their decision making, they were bound to finding a sound decision.

However, it is worth noting that Judge Majid had an assistant in handling his daily routines. Much damage would have been avoided had the Immigration department ensured the assistant worked closely enough with the judge, as the saying goes two heads are better than one. Moreover, the assistant and the judge ought to be fully conversant with their line of work from laws to ethics. Constant training ought to be accorded (Gherson, 2017).

Conclusion

In a nutshell, Roger's exercises restraint in looking into the matters of criminal justice. Both the tribunal and the judge have a share of what was expected. In the end, his questions on criminal are answered.

References

Gherson, R. (2017). Immigration judge under scrutiny after tribunal confirms he is failing to meet standards. Gherson.