Introduction
Marriage has different definitions based on personal, social, religious and legal principles that a people value. In a broad category that is legally recognized by the majority is that marriage is a union between two people who unite their lives emotionally, legally and economically. It is a contractual agreement and it only ends upon divorce of the couples in this regard the couples have a legal obligation towards each other. Marriage authorizes sexual relationships between the couples. It is important to note that marriage is based on different arrangements. Marriage equality is the state in which people of the same sex have a legal right to marry each other like individuals of the opposite sex. It is a case that has brought controversies around the globe bringing political, legal and social debates which require mitigations. The paper nuances a clear picture of the concept of marriage equality by expounding on its background, arguments for and against and a stand regarding the case. It will .also give a concrete conclusion on the issue.
The struggle to achieve marriage equality has been referred to as the "last great civil rights struggle" and it has been likened to the rights for racial equality in the 1950's. The analogy is because both groups fall into the minority. The fight for marriage equality has led to court a case that has seen the supreme courts in America granting the complainants the right. In 2013 in the United States of America the then president Barrack Obama associated the struggle for marriage equality to that of racial equality and stated that people of the same sex marriage must be granted the legal right to marry in order for the right of equality to be complete and vibrant. It was only a few months later the when the landmark case between the United States .v. Windsor was decided. In the case, the court invalidated section 3 of the marriage act. The cases were ruled in favor of marriage equality which allowed people of the same sex to marry although this brought significant controversies from religious, political and social spheres. Windsor's case ruling concerned a broad definition of marriage abolished marriage as a union between a man and a woman and to widen it into a union between two people who are in love with each other. According to a scholarly research, statics indicated that a quarter of America's population supported marriage between people of the same sex. In regard to the Windsor case ruling the more establishments have come up and gays and lesbians have come out and declared their sexual orientation because of a friendlier environment that accommodates their case. As more gays and lesbians embrace their sexuality people around them have to embrace them in a friendly way and not question their marriage. In the past years of 1975 a quarter of Americans were of same-sex marriage and by 2000 the numbers had tripled and it was approximated to be 75%.
Marriage equality needs to be upheld for the reason that love does not discriminate and people should be allowed to legally marry a person of choice regardless of their gender and in this regard gays and lesbians should be given the right to legally make marriage contracts and divorce at their own pleasure. Besides, lesbian and gay couples have the right to choose their marriage partners and not being imposed on them by the laws in the countries they inhabit this way they will exercise their right to the type of marriage they want. Similarly, the foundation for marriage is based love and character and not sexual characteristics of the couples involved. It is also upon the decision of an individual to love a person of their choice. Similarly, gays should be allowed to marry because marriage is not between a gender and another but between couples who are in love and are in mutual agreement to settle down. Additionally, marriage equality should be upheld because not all people follow religious principles that attribute same-sex marriage to sin. No one should, therefore, be forced to follow religious principles but instead, people should be allowed to make their own decisions. By upholding marriage equality acceptance of this minority group in the society will be fostered. It will also give same-sex couples rights and the legality of child adoption a case that was prohibited initially.
On the contrary, there are people who do not approve same-sex marriages on the basis that it is against religious principles a fact that does not hold water because people have different beliefs and some are not religious at all. Additionally, the argument against marriage equality is that in case of adoption of children they will need fathers in case they have been adopted by lesbians and mothers in case of gays but this is not a solid argument because there are those that have been neglected by either of the parents and a times stay with only one parent. Similarly, evidence of same-sex parenting is inadequate and adopted children may not develop good morals coupled with sex disorders when they grow up. It is an argument that has been raised but with no physical evidence.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it is important to note that marriage is a union between two people who unite their lives emotionally, legally and economically. Marriage is based on different arrangements. In my opinion, therefore, marriage equality need to generally accepted by the society because it is a state in which people of the same sex have a legal right to marry each other like individuals of the opposite sex. It is a case that has brought controversies around the globe bringing political, legal and social debates which require mitigations
It is a contractual agreement and it only ends upon divorce of the couples in this regard the couples have a legal obligation towards each other. Marriage authorizes sexual relationships between the couples. Marriage equality needs to be upheld for the reason that love does not discriminate and people should be allowed to legally marry a person of choice regardless of their gender and in this regard gays and lesbians should be given the right to legally make marriage contracts and divorce at their own pleasure. Besides, lesbian and gay couples have the right to choose their marriage partners and not being imposed on them by the laws in the countries they inhabit this way they will exercise their right to the type of marriage they want. No one should, therefore, be denied the right to exercise marriage freedom.
Works Cited
NeJaime, Douglas. "Marriage Equality and the New Parenthood." Harv. L. Rev. 129 (2015): 1185.
Robinson, Russell K. "Marriage Equality, and Postracialism." UCLA L. Rev. 61 (2013): 1010.
Cite this page
Argumentative Essay on Marriage Equality. (2022, Apr 04). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/argumentative-essay-on-marriage-equality
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- Community Presentation Sample: Elmwood Park
- Essay Sample on the Link Between Elected Officials Decisions and the Policy Preferences of Their Constituents
- Amish Community Essay Example
- Essay on Uncovering Chinese Race Perception: Widen the Survey to Global Perspectives
- Paper Example on Female Muslim Patient Refusal: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Hospital Care
- The Power of Coalitions - Free Essay Sample
- Essay on Confucius' Enduring Legacy: Examining the Benefits of Traditional Rites on Individuals and Communities