Introduction
The thought of having to kill, dissect, burn, or even harmfully induce some strain of diseases in animals is cruel, harmful, and more often than not ineffective. Everything about animal testing is wicked and should be stopped by all means possible. The paper will look into some of the significant reasons why animals should not be used for testing. These caged animals live in constant fear and suffer from loneliness.
Unethical
No matter how we look at it, having to confine an animal that has feelings and deserves some freedom of movement, is wrong (Hayelom, 2017). Then put them through a harrowing an experiment that may result in their death is quite immoral of humans.
Bad Science
The science of applying the results obtained from animal tests on humans often fails. The results are often are unreliable since humans differ from animals in their physiology. A report from the National Institutes of Health revealed that 95% of the tests that worked on animals, failed on humans (Hayelom, 2017).
Alternative Methods
There are alternative methods that can be explored in the quest to eliminate animal testing. Some of these include human-based micro-dosing where the human response to drugs is monitored after a minimal dose is induced to them; they are often too low to produce a whole-body effect but high enough to allow the response of the cells (Sepahban, 2015). Other methods developed include in vitro technology, simulators put on human patients, and chips put on human organs. These methods are more animal-friendly, cheap when compared to animal tests, faster and the accuracy level is high since the results are gotten from humans, not animals (Hayelom, 2017).
Animal experiments prolong the suffering of humans waiting for effective cures because the results mislead experimenters and squander precious money, time, and other resources that could be spent on human-relevant research. Animal experiments are so worthless that up to half of them are never even published.
It is quite wasteful to invest a lot of funds, time, and resources on carrying out experiments on animals, which later turns out to be a failed experiment when they do not work on humans. Too much time is taken while waiting for the test results that may be effective in curing humans. This lengthens the suffering period. The National Institutes of Health reports that around $12 billion goes to waste in research which is not published (Lawrence, 2018).
Conclusion
We have to base our choices on sound science and bad science, not animals and humans. Animals deserve freedom and no pain induced by humans; therefore, switching to methods that are more human-related, more modern, and do not include harming animals would be a huge step towards stopping the cruel animal tests.
References
Hayelom, H. (2017). Animal Testing. Stop Using Animals for Scientific Research. GRIN Verlag.
Lawrence, R. (2018). Should Animal Testing Be Banned? Greenhaven Publishing LLC.
Sepahban, L. (2015). Animal Testing: Life-Saving Research Vs. Animal Welfare. Capstone.
Cite this page
Animal Testing: Unethical and Inhumane Practice - Essay Sample. (2023, Apr 24). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/animal-testing-unethical-and-inhumane-practice-essay-sample
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- On the Duty of Civil Disobedience - Essay Analysis
- A Discussion on Homophobia and Its Impact on Gender Equality Essay
- Human Trafficking in California Essay Example
- War on Drugs, Gang Violence, Cocaine vs. Crack Essay Example
- Essay Sample on Why Is Water Not Free?: Understanding the Need to Manage Natural Resources
- Tim & Courtney's Journey to Recovery: Impact of Self-Help Groups - Essay Sample
- Paper Sample: Athletes Unite for Social Justice Awareness