Americans Failed to Remain United: 19th Century Constitutional Amendments - Essay Sample

Introduction

Numerous constitutional amendments in the context of American history describes reasons why were Americans failed to remain united under the constitution. The amendments that ranged from amendment seventh to income tax and voting rights still keeps the description and relations as to why the Americans were unable to remain united under the constitution during the nineteenth century. The Americans of the United States failed to remain united because of the restrictive rules, which was based on the grounds of the constitutional amendments as connected to people's opinions. The twenty-five amendment describes numerous reasons that explain why the Americans failed to remain united under the constitution in the nineteenth century. The amendment stated that the vice president of the United is allowed to become the president in case the resident failed to meet the requirement of the job description describing the basis why the majority of the Americans were unable to remain united under the constitution. The reasons extend to voting rights and restrictions, which explain the work of the ballot in connection to voting. The American civil war operated based on slavering, which explains the root cause of the war. The essay broadly analyses reasons why Americans were unable to remain united under the constitution in the nineteenth century, how and why did the civil war happen by discussing numerous amendments such as the twenty-five amendment, among others.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Voting Rights

Voting rights and restrictions amendments describe the basis, and some of the main reasons Americans were not able to unite under the constitution during the nineteenth century. The voting rights worked in favor of women, and the majority were restricted from the constitutional right of voting. It raised issues, and Americans had to form an individual decision, which explained individuals' stand of the amendment. Such move became valid from the movement of women in the United States known as suffrage, which was connected with women's rights in the context of voting. Women gathered and demanded their constitutional right to vote as related to their rights. The movement was referred to as the women's rights movement as connected to its influence of ensuring that women gain their constitutional right to vote.

The voting rights and restrictions, which explain why Americans were unable to remain united, extends to amendment twenty-three, which address the voting rights of numerous groups. The restrictive strategy before the introduction of this amendment created voting differences between the residents of the nation's capital, which comprised of the district of Columbia. The procedure before the enactment of the amendment restricted that people of Washington DC do not vote because they had no representative in the electoral post, thus denied them a chance. The state with the smallest population was also denied opportunities to manage or participate in the constitutional right of voting. Such a move acted in favor of states with a more significant population. It formed a basis under which Americans were unable to remain united under the constitution in the nineteenth century. The approach created differences across the Americans, explaining why the majority could not work together when it comes to constitutionals grounds, especially on electoral grounds.

Unequal Treatment and Poll Tax

Unequal treatments of the black Americans mainly pronounced on the grounds of electoral exercise and issue of the poll tax presents another reason why the majority of Americans were unable to remain united under the constitution in the nineteenth century. Before the enactment of the twenty-four amendment, the exercise acted as a restrictive measure, which formed the constitutional difference that separates the Americans. It explains why and reason that the American people could not work based on constitutional exercises and grounds. The voting bill again clarifies the fields under which Americans remained unable to unite on the lawful grounds during that time in the United States as connected to the tax bill. The introduction of the amendment brought a new move. It acted in accordance where there was equality on the grounds of electoral practices across the Americans, thus creating a specific pattern as connected to differences.

Eighteenth Amendment

The eighteenth amendment also presents similar grounds that explain why Americans were unable to unite in the nineteenth century. The amendment enacted or adopted in 1919 describes the basis under which the Americans took their sides regarding the effective move of the policy to outlaw the alcohol industry. The movement became the grounds of differences between the Americans because some supported and others did not create constitutional stands. Such a move was achieved by women groups, which explain their take to convince the federal government that alcohol was the primary reason for the domestic violence during that time. It was made valid and robust by conservative Christianity, which supported the movement in connection to moral stands (Benson & Gizelis 2020). The difference as emerged in the context where companies still purchased and bought alcohol even after the federal government moves to restrict any business associated with alcohol in the country. It implies different stands between the Americans as connected to alcohol stand speed by the constitutional positions of the federal government in the nineteenth century.

Civil War

Based on the American civil war, several reasons explain how and why the Americans civil war happened and on what basis. The civil war emerged from the differences between the northern and southern, which explains concepts of slavery and numerous reasons that led to their stands as connected to political positions. The differences can be made on the grounds of the free and slave states, which makes the differences and stands of these people serious cross the country. The main reason falls under the concept of political tension, where it was based on the national government to prohibit slavery practices in territories or regions that had not become states yet. The move to ban slavery from these territories that had not yet developed into states became even serious with the elected president Lincoln, which failed to acknowledge the distinct or separated group. The reason lay based on fear the national administration had, which explains that the United States could be distributed to numerous smaller groups and lose the legitimacy of democracy.

Tensions

The concept of social tension is evident in the civil war, which explains the difference in the rapid development of urbanization in the region as connected to two sites, northern and southern, which is linked to differences between the free and slave men. Despite the difference, numerous tensions existed during that time, which ranges from political, social, and economic tension. The economic tension is described as the basis of security problems, which is explained in the context of food and firearms (Ishiyama & Widmeier 2020). The difference existed between the two sides, northern and southern, as connected to the American civil war during those early days. The economic tension was ideal, which significantly describes how product prices raised to unexpected levels as related to the country situation, which was at war. Products that defined economic stands during that time raised, explaining numerous struggles borough by the American civil war as connected to the financial status of the country. There was no constant flow of food, and each side had to produce its food explaining the economic tension.

The political tension emerged from a series of political actions, including the political stands and election. Lincoln's election describes the political tension during the time of the American civil war. The political position acquired by Lincoln signified a positive impact that signaled succession. The pressure came in when Carolina withdrew from the union, creating the political tension (Pechenkina & Thomas 2020). The pattern in political tension followed when other sates described in the southern followed the trend and withdrew from the association, making this political pattern even further. The Missouri compromise and divided free slaving, explaining the political tension. Social tension during that time emerged. Volunteers that worked closely with the civil war armies demonstrate the approach of social tension described in the context of the American civil war as connected to differences between the two sides. The insignificant number of white volunteers actively described the concept of social tension, which is linked to civil war.

Conclusion

To sum up, numerous factors, including the initiation of amendments, describe the reasons why Americans were unable to remain united under the constitution in the nineteenth. Voting rights, as linked to amendment nineteenth, describe the differences that existed among Americans in the context of constitutional stands. Income tax also explains the basis of differences that existed among Americans in the context of legal positions. The differences were based on what individuals believed to be right, ranging from alcohol to electoral justice.

References

Benson, M., & Gizelis, T. I. (2020). A Gendered Imperative: Does Sexual Violence Attract UN Attention in Civil Wars?. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 64(1), 167-198. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0022002719841125

Ishiyama, J., & Widmeier, M. (2020). From "bush bureaucracies" to electoral competition: what explains the political success of rebel parties after civil wars?. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties, 30(1), 42-63. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17457289.2019.1572159?scroll=top&needAccess=true&journalCode=fbep20

Pechenkina, A. O., & Thomas, J. L. (2020). Battle Stalemates and Rebel Negotiation Attempts in Civil Wars. Security Studies, 1-28. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09636412.2020.1693619