Abrahamic Traditions: Monotheism of Judaism, Christianity & Islam - Essay Sample

Introduction

The Abrahamic traditions or religions, also known as Abrahamism, are groups of religious communities (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) who worship God Abraham believed. Abraham, in their tradition, were monotheistic, as revealed in their religion. In view of what they believed, their religion was based on the primary patriarch, which means that they were Tanakh, which in the Islamic Quran was acknowledged. This generation came down to Abraham's sons and was known by the Jews, Christians, and Muslims (Al-Faruqi & Ismail Raji). It is identified through their generation, which flows down, and his youngest son was called Isaac. For the Muslims, they had the eldest son as Ishmael. Besides, the three religious values have got massive following across the globe, whereby they have about 56% of the world population strictly following Judaism, Christianity, and Islamic doctrines (Silk & Mark). Nevertheless, the three Abrahamic religions have been under constant struggle for the interfaith supremacy and doctrines as each religion considers itself supreme over the other two. Hence, this paper describes why the Abrahamic religions have been under constant conflicts since their introduction time.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Abrahamic Traditions

Firstly, the three Abrahamic traditions, for Judas, Christians religion, and Islamic; they do most of these religious values and practices based on its origin; thus, at the beginning of its existence, there is a bound norm. These values include attitude, orientation, and positions that move towards Islamic values (Ali et al.). As such, Judaism and Christianity were among the first leading religions after Islamic. However, Islamic views them as its successor and calumniator. Since its formation, it has gained a formative momentum well known by them. This is an aspect well known by the Islamic leaders such as Muhammed, who articulated that the believer has time and again continued to see it hold waters that Islamic was explicitly built upon these values. In Judaism, these values did not make any outstanding sense, given that the doctrines constituted of understanding of Christian and Islam beliefs. It could not have such information where they were preceding such historical ideas (Silk & Mark).

The believers nowhere knew the idea of success or because people were quite innocent. In previous years, Christians and Islam made moves to arrive at the evolution of religion. It was conceived as a single faith with varying human religion that needs no improvement on the successors of their values that were monotheism (Knitter & Paul, 13). This was making sense in the times of Biblical errors and a long time in centuries. However, the monotheist in a wide range of believers such as idols polytheism.

The Christians

The Christians are viewed to have a stable stand on Judaism, which proceeds historically but towards the Islamic. They strategically move to the direction of the succeeding and leading the historical move to correct it in the previously existing forms of Abraham monotheism as made right. In Judaism, definitive shape, religious. And historical in that foundation. Back in the days from 1225-1274, Christians came to reveal and explicitly declaring itself as Israel versus as actu8al Israel. This came after a strong resistance by the willful Jews who forfeited divine favor and mercy rejecting Jesus. Jesus has rightfully anointed Messiah, as argued by (Al-Faruqi & Ismail Raji). In the middle age, the Jews suffered a systematic Church-driven prosecution inflicted by what they believed. This was portrayed by their strong refusal of Jesus as the true redeemer and the true humankind of Christians. The long evolving attitude was too difficult for the Jews to understand and entrust their custodianship of care. This was fulfilled as never was by the Jews' time before (Knitter & Paul, 17). Thence, the attitude portrays the nature of superstition the Jews have been for a long time.

The next point is the aspect of Christian's dismay to view the reports of Muslims where they claim Jesus as their son as the Christians believe it. Jesus is viewed as a Prophet based on the Islamic religion. This is a recognition of the way the Islamic view the supersessions towards Christianity. There is a significant failure by the two religions to come to terms with their counterpart about the view of each one's religion. The Jews and their faith are not validated by the acknowledgment of the Jews tradition. Understanding the facts, the Christians define the early occupation in its preferred version and the Judaism history. There is a failure to acknowledge Judaism for what they are in terms of self-sufficient single believers.

Christians speaking of the Old Testament, they are reading it in view of what they believe about it. The New Testament is viewed from the perspective of the unfinished predecessor (Gregerman & Adam, 43). The Christians fa9thful have no idea or not willing to understand the Bible version of the Old Testament. They view this in line with the self-sufficient faith and the rights it holds (Hughes & Aaron). Their tradition and ethical values have a single stand that ensembles the ideas that find it difficult to meet the terms with the appropriation and the treatment of Islam. This is made as a supersession attitude and approach that deals with the right exceptions. It resists the understanding of the formative ad foundational consensual of Judaism.

Muslims

Furthermore, there are Muslims who still dismay and bewilder the way Islamic civilization as a long enjoyed ascending and dominance. This gives a real picture of the possibility of living the globe with its terms as defined by the historical script. The next accommodation hat world of Islam exercised during the first thousands of years ago in its career (Knitter & Paul, 20). Instead of choosing the forward move, they needed to find themselves move coherently in the direction of believing their religion. It becomes so disheartening for Islam to believe that they were deprived of their divined couch ascendancy (Al-Faruqi & Ismail, Raji). There is a recent attack by the Islamic terrorists that are inspired by the reaction towards the conviction that is confined to racial radicalization. This is far more ad deeply rooted in the Islamic world.

It is culminated by their history of which there is a party that has taken the wrong turn (Gregerman & Adam, 45). The path to ride the pervasive departed and illegitimate deprives the divine history of the ordained Islamic culture. The world needed to follow the Islamic trend of the history of being hostile to the Islamic. This has not always been a kind experience for the Muslims. This is a unique approach as there are militant and jihadi activists now feel entitled to set right precedent (Hughes & Aaron) forcibly. Most importantly. The Jews and the evolving traditions come from Maimonides that is straddled of the world of all the three Abraham's faith. The first was in Spain, North Africa, and Egypt that the Christians and Islam's were formed. The adverse nature of the religion was determined by the view of the faithful norms entrenched by the holy traditions and revelations in the sacred scriptures (Ali & MD Yousuf). Religion has some origin that is derived from the doctrines of Judaism but not towards Islam.

Primarily, the key concern here is that the religion constitutes of the foundation of the Muslims of good faith enter into interreligious conversation with the Jews and Christians. The far noticed cases here is the aspect of good faith that is not in the values of the faith and the imperative of the democratic pluralisms (Gregerman & Adam, 53). The position of the religion only stands if they adopt the fashion of the prejudicial approach that does not offer opportunities to the preconceptions and preferences of any party over the others (Hughes & Aaron). This way, it does not impugn and dramatize the derived beliefs (Silk & Mark). No one party tells another who is believed to stand based on the permitted engagement of the accommodation of the interlocutor (Al-Faruqi & Ismail Raji). The most vital issue here is the stages of the process that negotiates the substantive doctrine ad difference between faith systems (Gregerman & Adam, 58). However, patients engage mutual respect as a negotiated basis of the conversation accepted as equal and partial.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the three Abrahamic religions have been conflicting with each other over supremacy and doctrines for more than 100 decades. The three major religions (Christianity, Judaism, and Islam) have been applying propaganda tactics against one another to convince their followers. Nevertheless, they should stop this struggle and embrace peace and reconciliation amongst them to purely teach the Word of God to their followers, as this aspect will enhance a peaceful environment among the interfaith across the globe. This analysis is critical as it has analyzed the view of religion in society. Most of the people will have to deal with their religion in regard to what it means to them. However, each of these religions has its norms that define the positions of beliefs.

Works Cited

Al-Faruqi, Ismail Raji. Trialogue of the Abrahamic faiths. No. 1. International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), 1995.

Ali, MD, Yousuf. "The three Abrahamic faiths and their roles in making peace, unity, and co-existence." World Journal of Islamic History and Civilization 1.3 (2011): 187-200.

Gregerman, Adam. "Superiority without Supersessionism: Walter Kasper, The Gifts and the Calling of God Are Irrevocable, and God's Covenant with the Jews." Theological Studies 79.1 (2018): 36-59.

Hughes, Aaron W. Abrahamic religions: On the uses and abuses of history. Oxford University Press, 2012.

Knitter, Paul. "Christianity and the religions: a zero-sum game? reclaiming" the path not taken" and the legacy of Krister Stendahl." (2011): 5-21.

Silk, Mark. "The Abrahamic Religions as a Modern Concept." The Oxford Handbook of the Abrahamic Religions. 2015.