A Response to Three Texts on the Civil Rights Movements

Using the very same constitution the racist white politicians used against them, they framed arguments and made proclamations. Without any shame of being black, they dared try what was prohibited even though was no crime, that is registering to vote. This paper examines three different articles, two of which are pro-Civil Rights Movements and one being an anti-Civil Rights Movements to highlight the opinions of the authors towards the subject matter, the invaluable contributions of each activist towards, and the quest of freeing people of color. contributions

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The Civil Rights Movements brought together various campaigner of the freedom of the people of color. Peaceful as they were in speech and actions, Martin Luther King Jr and Hamer had a huge impact on the the liberation of the people of color from segregation, oppression, and discrimination. Through peaceful processions and crusades, these fighters of justice for the black community dedicated their lives to free their people. They had had enough and dared to gather the courage to face their oppressors.

The first document examines the contributions of Hamer and her colleagues to the Civil Rights Movements. This article presents Hamer's personal account of the events that took place during her struggle for the freedom of the people of color. The article takes the approach of a documentary film or a reality TV show that follows the character to every place they go to. For instance, this article follows Hamer and her colleagues to Indianola and continues to do so even when they leave Indianola for Ruleville. It captures every event that happens when the journey begins when it breaks, and even after it continues and ends at Hamer's house. In other words, this article sheds light on Hamer's activism both outside and inside her house.

The second article takes a different stance from the first one. It depicts the Civil Rights Movement as a crusading activity. It focuses on the famous speech of Martin Luther King Jr as it attempts to drive the points about its perception of the Civil Rights Movement home. In other words, this is like a live-streaming of a campaign rally. It presents the Movements as rallies and leads activists, King in this case, as campaigners who have great oratorical skills. King was a great orator and this article finds it convenient to use that as a tool for depicting the movements. This shows that the author perceives the Civil Rights Movements as political movements that seek to bring about change through rallies. The third article assumes a stance of depicting the Civil Rights Movements that is quite different from the two. This one focuses on the oppositions against the movements.

It is quite difficult to tell the differences between these three authors' opinions about the Civil Rights Movements. However, the first author seems to be in support of the Civil Rights Movements. This is demonstrated by the manner in which they depict the events surrounding Hamer's activism. There is no addition of personal sentiments neither is there any form of distortion in the storyline. The account that this author presents is the same as the accounts that other authors also present Hamer in their stories. The vivid description of the happenings in Hamer's case also illustrated the author's opinion of the activism. This means that they want the matter to come out as passionately clear as possible. This is like a cameraman who focuses on the speaker without even showing the attempts of someone who is trying to interrupt them. This is why, at Indianola, the author doesn't focus on the officer who gives Hamer the literacy test.

The author of the second article also makes a clean presentation of the Civil Rights Movement. It is like a pro-King author who wants to present the teachings of King, as the authors of the Gospels in the Bible. The pacifism with which this work is presented shows that the author views the movements as a peaceful procession through which seek radical changes. The final article is in opposes the Civil Rights Movements as it presents logical arguments against it. This is a subtle rebuttal which for a moment the reader may think is a pro-Civil Rights Movements column until it mentions the opposition of the laws.

Hamer and her colleagues in the Civil Rights Movement brought about the freedom of voting to the people of color. Her non-violent appeal to the authorities to let black people register as voters bestowed up the black community their recognition as full citizens with voting rights. Martin Luther King Jr. inspired peaceful protests against the oppression of the regime as well as its constitutional backsliding. Governor George changed the country for the worse as it stirred the war against the Civil Rights Movements, thereby dragging back the quest for freedom for the people of color.

Hanner and King were both black activists who had tasted the segregation and persecution of black people. This informed their decisions on the subjects to cover and influenced their actions in the course of activism. The governor came from a clique of the political elite for whom oppressive laws and acts of discrimination never worked. He clearly did not understand the pains of the oppressed and could not comprehend their struggles. Therefore, his opinions were overshadowed by the comfort in which he was used to living in. When he says that the Civil Rights Law isn't law but a penal code, he is simply using what the famous Ta-Nehisi referred to as the politics of personal exoneration. In other words, segregation and discrimination against the people of color ought not to have been criminalized- they were a normal occurrence. This also demonstrates the privilege of being white, where every evil done to the whites doesn't seem like an evil thing. These characters in their different roles in the Civil Rights Movements have their actions shaped and influenced differently by their backgrounds, mostly racial. It makes their views and opinions unique to their experiences and so do their arguments.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Hamer and Martin Luther King Jr. devoted their lives in different capacities to fight for the freedom of people of color. Hamer, even though lacking literacy skills never cowed and instead dared to challenge the system. King, being a talented orator and an educated man used his intellect to champion for the freedom of people of color. With bravery, he dared challenge the system, mobilizing thousands of black people against it. Even though they didn't quite live to see the full fruits of their efforts, their contributions remain to be invaluable in the history of black liberation.