Three dimensional (3D) printing is one technology that has various applications that have transformed the world tremendously especially in the building and construction industry. Researchers note that construction industry is one of the most expensive industries because of the heavy investment capital and resources that go into it and significant environmental stress that emanates from the construction activities. According to Nasir et al. (2014), buildings consume more than that 30 percent of raw materials, 36 percent of the total energy generated and approximately 15 percent of the total amount of water consumed in the United States. Research further indicates that construction industry has low productivity across different countries including developed nations (Nasir et al. 2014).
Over the past few years, research on innovations in construction has been done to address the environmental, productivity and other related issues. In terms of innovation, the studies have focused on two major forms which include response to clients' needs (external) and innovation originating from other industries (Arayici et al. 2011). However, one thing that stands out is the fact that more emphasis has been put on the use of technology from other industries to increase the competitive advantage in the construction industry. It is for this reason that construction industry is regarded as a low-tech industry with little innovation despite the ever changing technological advancements. Bogue (2013) defines 3D printing as an automated, additive process of manufacturing 3-D solid objects using a digital model. There are different types of 3-D printing technology processes. The five common types of 3-D printing used in building and construction include: stereolithography, fused deposition modelling, Inkjet powder printing, Selective laser sintering and Contour crafting (Bogue, 2013). 3-D printing technology is poised to continue transforming the building and construction industry due to its great potential. In order to understand how 3D printing can aid in achievement of affordable housing in Cambodia, it is important to critically analyse the population and housing statistics in Cambodia.
According to Cook & Singh, (2016), Cambodia is in transition with an approximate developing and growing population of 16 million. The population is projected to rise to 18.9 million people by 2030 with youths and children forming the majority (Cook et al. 2016). Incomes have also been on the rise even though at a slower rate in relation to the cost of living. Research by the Ministry of Housing of Cambodia note that the 2.5-3 million increase in population by 2030 will require approximately 1 million housing units (Cook et al. 2016). The 2016 report by the United Nation's Word Cities estimated that more than 55 percent of the urban population in Cambodia live in slums. The situation is even worse in rural areas of Cambodia with 70 percent of people living in poor houses. According to local research, 13.5 percent of Cambodia's population live below the national poverty level and majority of such people dwell in inadequate houses (Cook et al. 2016).
Due to the inexplicable statistics above, the Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC) is determined to carry out several initiatives aimed at addressing the housing challenge for poor people in Cambodia. The government adopted the National Housing Policy and established the General Department of Housing under the Ministry of Land in 2014 (Cook et al. 2016). The two initiatives are aimed at designing, coordinating, supporting and delivering development of low cost houses that are affordable for the poor population of Cambodia. To formalize the initiatives, the Royal Government of Cambodia incorporated them into the National Strategic Development plan 2014-2018. In order to achieve the National Housing Policy goal of providing affordable housing, the government entered into an agreement with the Non-governmental Organizations and the private sector through signing of Memorandums of Understanding (Cook et al. 2016). However, there is one greater challenge to the attainment of affordable low cost housing for people in Cambodia which is the construction costs involved.
In order to address the cost and sustainability factor in affordable housing, innovative building technology must be adopted. Production of different construction materials, components and products is the main contributor to the soaring cost of construction. According to Thunberg et al. (2014), for construction projects to be efficient, construction firms need to master the projects within short time frames and limited available space. However, this is a challenge for building of houses due to non-value addition activities and low productivity from wasted materials. It is for this reason that housing construction is considered inefficient and low-tech in nature (Thunberg et al. 2014). In order to solve the inefficiency problem in building and construction, flexible way of producing building components called additive manufacturing has been developed over time. With the 3D printing (3DP), building components can be produced in a faster, efficient and cheaper way compared to other alternatives (Petrick & Simpson, 2013).
Petrick & Simpson (2013), notes that the increase in use of additive manufacturing and 3D printing are gradually replacing the conventional economies of scale production due to their ability to produce one model within the shortest time possible. One of the largest building and construction companies in Sweden, NCC, has been exploring ways through which they can offer sustainable solutions to construction industry. One of the ways through which NCC has managed to create sustainable construction solutions, is the use of 3D printing technology to in building houses and this has given the company a competitive edge against her competitors (Skold & Vidarsson, 2015). Construction industry has not been able to implement innovative technologies such as total quality management, just-in-time delivery and supply chain management yet other industries have done it. Construction industry has a challenge of standardization of activities therefore cannot benefit from economies of scale related to volume (Skold et al. 2015). Building and construction industry is more project oriented such that each housing project is customized according to the conditions and the surroundings. This makes housing projects to be unique which require construction companies to be flexible and able to customize the projects to meet the ever changing conditions. One of the ways to do this is through 3D printing of houses.
Research by Skold et al. (2015) indicates that additive manufacturing of building components requires no tooling during the production process thus leads to reduction of production expenses and ramp-up time. 3D printing technology has proven the economic viability of printing one-off products or small batches with a possibility of quick and late change of product design (Skold et al. 2015). The 3D printing process in additive manufacturing of construction materials allows optimization of a component to perform a specific function according to needs. Also, 3D printing reduces wastage since only required materials are produced with specific measurements (Skold et al. 2015). The whole supply chain for construction is simplified through lower inventories and shorter lead-times which is a common problem for most house construction projects.
Past studies have recorded some of the best examples of how 3D printing has been used in building industry. The Canal House in Amsterdam by Dus Architects is a good example where different parts of the house were printed by a giant printer (Hager, Golonka & Putanowicz, 2016). According to the architects, printing of the house components on site eliminated wastage of building material completely while also reducing the transportation cost. Application of similar concept while putting up houses will help in reduction of construction cost by a significant margin. A giant 3D printer by the name KamerMaker was used to print house components through creation of models that were then used in printing (Hager et al. 2016). The use of thermoplastic material which is biodegradable reduces the environmental impact of building.
According to Hager et al. (2016), Winsun Decoration Design Engineering Co. from China has been at the forefront of using 3D printing to build affordable houses. In 2014, Winsun managed to build various houses from printed prefabricated elements which are readily available in many countries. The estimated cost of one house that was built by Winsun is 4,800 dollars (Hager et al. 2016). Comparing this cost with income of majority of residents in Cambodia who earn above 500 dollars a month, the houses are affordable. In the Winsun project, fibreglass, hardening agent and industrial wastes were used to make the components. All the above materials are environmentally friendly and Cambodia can borrow a leaf from China.
Conclusion
Wijk & Wijk, (2015), in his book assesses the benefits of 3D printing in environmental conservation. He compares the amount of concrete and CO2 emitted when building a traditional town house and the one for a printed house. From the research, it is clear that more concrete is used thus producing more carbon emissions to make a traditional house than a 3D printed house (Wijk et al. 2015). Generally, 3D printing technology offers a more sustainable, cost-effective and affordable housing for people. 3D printing technology is still young but it offers a lot of opportunities for affordable house construction. From the literature review, Cambodia stands to benefit most by applying 3D printed technology in realization of the National Housing Policy of providing low cost housing for people in Cambodia.
References
Arayici, Y., Coates, P., Koskela, L., Kagioglou, M., Usher, C., & O'Reilly, K. J. S. S. (2011). BIM adoption and implementation for architectural practices. Structural survey, 29(1), 7-25.
Bogue, R. (2013). 3D printing: the dawn of a new era in manufacturing?. Assembly Automation, 33(4), 307-311.
Cook, M., & Singh, D. (Eds.). (2016). Southeast Asian Affairs 2016. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
Hager, I., Golonka, A., & Putanowicz, R. (2016). 3D printing of buildings and building components as the future of sustainable construction? Procedia Engineering, 151, 292-299.
Nasir, H., Ahmed, H., Haas, C., & Goodrum, P. M. (2014). An analysis of construction productivity differences between Canada and the United States. Construction Management and Economics, 32(6), 595-607.
Petrick, I. J., & Simpson, T. W. (2013). 3D printing disrupts manufacturing: how economies of one create new rules of competition. Research-Technology Management, 56(6), 12-16.
Skold, G., & Vidarsson, H. (2015). Analyzing the Potentials of 3D-Printing in the Construction Industry.
Thunberg, M., Rudberg, M., & Gustavsson, T. K. (2014). Identifying and positioning construction supply chain planning problems. Management, 1069, 1078.
Wijk, A. ., & Wijk, I. . (2015). 3D printing with biomaterials: Towards a sustainable and circular economy.
Cite this page
3D Print Component in Housing Essay Example. (2022, Oct 20). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/3d-print-component-in-housing-essay-example
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Sustainability at Saudi Aramco
- Research Paper on Innovation in Healthcare through Technology
- The Loss of Privacy in the Internet Era: Is the Government Sleeping On Their Duty Paper Example
- Article Analysis Essay on "Have Smartphones Destroyed a Generation"
- Research Paper on AI: Too Important for Google & Facebook Alone
- Enhancing Business Efficiency and Competitive Advantage - Free Report Sample
- Paper Sample on The Burden of Social Science/Humanities Research: Balancing Innovation and Tradition