When President Roosevelt took office, America was at the midst of the great depression calamity, and therefore the ordinary citizens needed something that would ease their lives and make it less straining as it had previously been. Upon his the defeat of his political opponent, Roosevelt knew the task that awaited him was difficult, and that if his presidency were to last long, the poor people who had been neglected would have to be addressed. As Martha Gellhorn notes in her report, "the people only trust on the supreme being of the president Roosevelt, he is the only president who ever addressed the grievances of the forgotten man." Therefore, to meet these expectations and to address the sufferings of the poor people, he offered the nation a New Deal which had a sole purpose of eliminating the economic constraints and unemployment, while at the same time provide greater opportunity while restoring prosperity in the United States.
However, the new deal also gave the Federal government more powers and control over public and private projects and finances in the attempt of providing regulations to corporations and institutions which were deemed as the source of the great depression. These regulations were welcomed by the poor people who more often blamed the large corporations for their woes while the business class saw it as an infringement on their freedoms and hard work. According to the people opposing the New deal, the restrictions on how much wealth one could accumulate were a contradiction on the ideals in which the United States was founded upon, and unconstitutional. Examples of such sentiments were echoed in the Herbert Hoovers campaign speech in 1936. He pointed out his opposition towards the deal by indicating that, the agreement aims at attacking the freedom and liberties of the free people. He further notes that the deal violates the constitution as it limits what free men should accomplish in the field of business and trade by the introduction of trade monopolies and price fixing through codes.
By the government acquiring too much power as a result of the new deal, most rich people felt threatened by their government. They thought that they would be compelled to share their wealth with the poor people whom most deemed as lazy and unable to be helped unless they help themselves. According to some of the propositions of the deal by Huey Long on the redistribution of wealth; every family was to be furnished by the government, no person would have a fortune of less $ 5,000, and a limit of $ 1,500,000 and $ 5,000,000 had to be imposed. While the abled saw it as a violation of their rights as enshrined in the constitution, the poor did not have a problem with the proposed regulations as most could not afford a decent living. Instead of condemning the perceived infringement on the individual's freedom most Americans who were composed of the poor and the unemployed welcomed such ideas as it offered a glimpse of hope.
The New Deal succeeded significantly in altering how the government serves its people. Despite the objections and the hurdles that the deal faced, the poor people were provided with some form of economic relief which offered them better wages. They were allowed to form trade unions which would defend their rights, the working hours and the average minimum wage. Against the fears that individual rights would be violated, the deal upheld these rights by ensuring that free people had a decent life, they were free from fear of intimidation and threat by their employers and organizations. The free people were assured of freedom of speech and expression of their grievances without being sacked.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the New Deal was a better than nothing deal for the American people; it changed the lives of the ordinary citizens who had been forgotten by the previous governments and were ravaging in punishing poverty before president Roosevelt took power. His policies and the effects of the deal would change the American political landscape forever in that the later candidates would prioritize on the wellbeing of the poor people. The agreement paved the way on how future governments should take up the role of ensuring its people security and decent lives. Thanks to the deal, programs like social security and FDIC came into existence.
Cite this page
The New Deal and the Relationship Between Individual Freedom and Government Action. (2022, May 17). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/the-new-deal-and-the-relationship-between-individual-freedom-and-government-action
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- Abortion Public Policy in the US Essay Example
- Essay Example on Sovereign Immunity: A Judicial Code of Belief for Restricting Government
- The Rationality of Voting: An Analysis of Anthony Downs' Theory
- FOMC Meeting: Summary of Minutes on Policy Rate Tools - Essay Sample
- Liberalism & Realism: A Comparison of Political Philosophies - Essay Sample
- Essay Example on the Impact of Healthcare Policies: Ensuring Quality Health Services for All
- Essay on Andrew Falce Explores What Defines a Superpower Nation