This essay elaborates on the concept of evil and how people view evil, different people have different views of sin brought about by their religion, culture and individual reasons hence making the term evil a large complicated to understand. People have different concepts of evil as it is shown in this essay and at times they constantly conflict.
Introduction
Since World War II, legal, political, and moral philosophers have an increment in the interest of the idea of describing evil. The investment has been halfway propelled by the credits of name 'evil' by the laymen, writers, legislators, and social researchers as they try much to comprehend and react to various outrages and abhorrence's, for example, manslaughters, mass murders, mass homicides, and tortures and murdering binges by psychopathic sequential executioners. It appears that we can't understand ethical significance of these activities and the culprits who do the acts by calling them 'wrong' or 'awful' or also calling them 'wrong' or 'exceptionally awful.' We need to understand the concept of evil.
As opposed to this massive idea of wickedness, the narrow concept of evil selects just the most moral wretched sorts of activities, the characters, the occasions, and others. As the by the name Marcus Singer terms it "'evil' is the worst possible term of opprobrium imaginable" (Singer 2004, 185). This thin idea of abhorrence includes moral judgment; therefore; it is appropriately attributed just to ethical specialists and their actions. If just people are moral agents, at such a point only individuals can be able to perform various malicious activities. Malicious in this narrow sense is frequently implied when the word 'evil' is used in contemporary moral, legitimate, and political settings. This passage will only concentrate on the concept of evil in this smaller sense. In this passage, we will talk about evil in the broad sense or the issue of wickedness.
War to many is an evil act while to others it's a natural thing. If a country like China has internal conflicts leading to civil fighting, would it be harmful or beneficial? China has the world largest population. The Chinese people have overexploited their natural resources and are now turning to other nations trying to settle to decongest their land. If war erupts in the country, there would be one main consequence which is the loss of life. In as much as some people side with it as an evil act due to the death of innocent lives, other will view it as a positive move to reduce population and the natural resources will be safer.
The concept of evil has been viewed differently by people and communities, immorality as a form of crime has been seen differently by different cultures. In modern life, it is evident to say that in most developed countries the mode of dressing is different than in developing countries. Countries like the U.S. and Europe countries you find people wearing little clothes which can be described as almost naked. When you take the case of African countries, it is immoral to be in such garments as some see it as a taboo which to them is evil due to their culture.
Some people have an idea where they say that we ought not to desert the idea of insidiousness because just the thought of fiendishness can catch the ethical importance of acts, occasions, and characters, for example, torches by sadists, sequential executioners, Holocaust, and the Hitler. Daniel Haybron says in his book that "Prefix your adjectives [such as 'wrong' or 'bad'] with as many 'very's as you like; you still fall short. Only 'evil,' it seems, will do" (Haybron, & Daniel, 260). As indicated in the argument above, it is easy to accept that evil are common; and if this fiendish are common, we ought to have an idea to catch this unethical extraordinary. David McNaughton and Eve Garrard comparatively have a sense that this evil picks a very distinct part of our ethical phenomenology.
Religion is another factor that makes dressing determine evil or good. Asian countries are an example, most believe in Muslim as their religion, and they think that their women should not show their bodies. They at sometimes hide the face to leaving only the eyes exposed but, can be exposing your body to define evil? What about the non-believers in culture and religion? Should they be bounded by this believes because they live in the same community?
The concept of evil differs in different people's ideas, but who can describe sin? And if they can, is it unchallengeable? Pickpocketing is described to many as an evil act, despite it being a source of winning the daily bread by another party. In a case where a kid is brought up with poverty as the challenge and education becomes a challenge to be availed, it will turn out that the kid will have to find a way to hustle. With the high demand for qualified employees, the kid might not get a job and remember he/she has to eat live and maybe provide for the family and bills. In such a case it is hard to define evil. The person who losses an item due to the incident will describe it as evil, but what about providing a job opportunity for the "evil" doer. There is lose to one and again to another person, but crime in the situation is not easy to be sided with.
It is all around acknowledged that to play out a malicious activity and a specialist must be ethically in charge of what he/she does. Even though hurricanes and rattlesnakes can cause incredible mischief, they can't perform any evil actions at all since they are not moral specialists. Moreover, moral agents possibly perform underhanded activities when they are ethically in charge of what they do, and their actions are moral. To meet these conditions criminals must act intentionally, expect or predict their injured individual's torment, and need moral avocation for the case of their activities. It's especially questionable whether the conditions are met in these three sorts of situations; actual damages realized by insane people, substantial damages achieved by people who have had awful childhoods, and actual damages achieved through obliviousness.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the concept of evil can be judged differently according to religion, culture, environment, and also personal beliefs. Most people will describe crime by either what on gains or what they lose. Evil might not be evil to another person; hence all should respect every other person's concept. And since we all have the feature that animals don't of sense, and then we should all utilize it in determining evil.
Work Cited
Haybron, Daniel M., ed. Earth's Abominations: Philosophical Studies of Evil. Vol. 120. Rodopi, 2002.
Singer, Marcus G. "The concept of evil." Philosophy 79.2 (2004): 185-214.
Cite this page
The Concept of Evil - Essay Sample. (2022, Nov 30). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/the-concept-of-evil-essay-sample
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- Compare and Contrast Essay on Plato and Aristotle: Similarities and Differences
- Essay Sample on Nietzsche vs Aristotle on Logic
- Essay Example on the Role of Ethics in Leadership in the 21st Century
- Human Nature: Unchangeable but Not Unmalleable - Essay Sample
- Essay Sample on Ethical Standards: A Guide to Doing Things Right
- Essay Example on A Life Worth Living: Socrates' Theory of an Examined Life
- Bioethics: A Global Concern for Human Beliefs & Values - Essay Sample