Supporting Views to William Paley's Argument Essay Example

The theories postulated by historians of science have argued that the existence of scientific culture resulted from religious justification for science. It provides a dynamic relationship between the universe and religion (Brooke, 297). Gray's thesis is one of the exemplary contexts demonstrating the original perspective that reflects the intelligence of God. Based on the explanations provided through the theory, it is evident that many theorists have attributed the physical nature of the universe to the supernatural beings. Gray's explains God as the creator and the planner of the universe. Therefore, the universe has original context with pre-organized nature. It is true that the universe is an organized world. In fact, it is one of the most and precisely developed systems whose creations tend to exist in an orderly way. Despite different controversial views presented by the scientific theorist, the omnipresence aspect of God is evident through the design of the universe. While many perspectives offered by physical scientist tend to oppose supernatural organization of the world, it is evident that God perfected and designed the visible and non-visible universe.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Apart from the Grays thesis, most of the religious theorist and groups believe in the existence of a supernatural being. Even though they have different creation myths and stories, it is evident that the superpower being is in charge of creating the order surrounding the living beings. A similar explanation is apparent through the work of other religious theorists. For example, the teleological arguments provide a precise understanding of how the process occurred. For example, it supports the existence of a deity through several pieces of evidence and the working of God. It precisely outlines the fact that the origin of human must have been through an organized system rather than other aspects theorized by science (Garte, 42). It, therefore, tend to outdo the fact that humans evolved or instead originated from the skeleton or other aspects of natural evolution. Furthermore, it explains that human artifact results from intelligent design thus have different purposes. Besides, the universe is described as a place that resembles human artifact and has a meaning. However, the entire world is more complicated as compared to the social object. Thus, the kind or nature has a vastly intelligent designer

Based on William's Paley's argument, it is evident that his theories provide an understanding of natural experiences and other aspects surrounding his life. Through the watchmaker analogy, he describes the different background of the existence of one God rather than several gods (Garte, 47). The watchmaker is thus referred to as God. The argument thus supports the existence of the supernatural being. It is with a similar basis of understanding that the prominent scientist, Isaac Newton, and Rene Descartes explained their physical laws which had been uncovered by Paley. Coincidentally, Paley's work had revealed the dominant mechanical perfection of the workings of the universe to be linked to the watchmaker. Besides, some of the scientists have endorsed Paley in different ways. For example, Charles Darwin, an evolutionary scientist, had supported his findings and work. He praised him for the strong logical beliefs in God as the designer of the universe (Garte, 42).

The work of Newton appreciates the arguments provided regarding heaven and earth. For example, the aspect of gravitational explanations provides the correlations between the heavenly world and the ground. Therefore, the regulative basis of the heavenly and earthly bodies suggests some pre-established mechanism that explains the principles beyond the occurrence of gravitational forces. Moreover, many other explanations described by the scientist tend to agree with the pre-existence of the natural laws. For example, Hume Edwards further explains the fact that the designs of God cause the organization of the earth. He outlines that the universe has internal causal explanations that obviate the need for a transcendent cause (Garte, 42). Besides, he argued based on cosmological aspect where he believes that the universe exists through transcendent characters that connect pre-existing activities with the present.

Therefore, William Paley is correct since his arguments align with those used to support scientific theories. Also, the watchmaker argument has had a significant impact,especially on the atheist. It is one of the theories that utilizes observation with a keen interest in developing the relationship between the organization of the science and the universe. It outlines the dynamic nature of the world and how everything is brought together with the aim of providing meaning in the understanding of life.

The creation myths of the universe have received different context and theories that explain their origin. For instance, the Judeo Christianity explains it different as compared to the Eastern religion such as Hinduism and Buddhism (Brooke, 297). However, all of them appreciate some level of the fact that the creator is an organized being whose plans to align the desired nature of the world and the universe. Paley provides a picture of how God's plan the universe and provides an explanation of how different factors such as the organization of the planetary system and the existence of supernatural activities exist. The explanation is important and contributes to the truth that underlies the nature and organization of the universe.

Apart from Paley's explanations is evident that the universe has dynamic occurrences such as seasons, cosmology and other aspects such as lunar occurrences whose periodic phenomena have not been well-defined through science. The processes, therefore, provides some explanations that relate to what Paley explains. On the other hand, scientist tends to relate the physical laws, biological and chemical mechanism to the earth's existence and occurrence of the universe. Also, science does not exclusively explain civilization without the support of internal factors whose origin can be attributed to a supernatural force. Therefore, this provides a room to focus on teleological theories since it precisely connects religion and science.

Conclusion

Teleological arguments have been supported by another theorist such as Craig. The Kalam cosmological argument also explains some connection between the cosmological argument and the existence of God (Brooke, 297). The theory was then formulated by Craig which argued against the possibility of the existence of infinities. It thus provided a different aspect that brings an understanding of the personality agents involved in the creation of the universe. Therefore, it is through the influence of a creator that the world comes into being. The impossibility of the actual finite distinguishes his arguments Tomas Aquinas which argued that it is impossible to have an ordered infinite regress. However, the case provides the support of the fact that the universe does not only rely on the context of the physical laws. Instead, it has the creator, designer, and a planner. Without the pre-existence of an organized nature of God, then the physical and cosmological explanations of the universe could not have existed.

Works Cited

Brooke, John Hedley. "Darwinism and the Survival of Religion." The Historical Review/La Revue Historique 14: 267-291.

Garte, Seymour. "Teleology and the Origin of Evolution." Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 69.1 (2017): 42-42.