Rhetorical Essay on The Flight from Conversation

Introduction

In this rhetorical analysis, I will focus on "The Flight from Conversations" written by Sherry Turkle. The author is a medical psychologist and a tutor of the Program in Science, Technology, and Society at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She has been in the studies of technologies of digital linking for above 10 years and betrothed individuals about their clued-up subsist. The writer evaluates the worthiness of communicating head-on and the precincts of technological linking. She observes that individuals will prefer using social platforms to communicate than communicating face to face. The author holds it that technology only permits us to retain individuals at the accurate detachments, neither excessively far-off nor excessively nearby. She states straightforwardly that however much time we spend on the social media platform, it would never be replaced by actually talking to one another. Head-on dialogues enable people to understand their characters, endurance as well as nurture long-lasting associations (Turkle 61). Conversely, connecting through social media confines the chance for self-imaging and makes people hide their actual selves. Through creating these claims, Sherry says that it is time we start embracing actual conversations. While supporting real conversations as being very essential since they have the constituent of trust and self-reflection and help people understand as well as know each other, Turkle uses ethos, pathos, and logos appeals to effectively lay her claims.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Turkle makes powerful urgings by giving manifold situations that give proof of the way individuals have foregone talking to each other for contacts through social media. The writer was very operative when reconnoitering the paybacks of head-on communication compared to the short-lived gratification of connecting via technology. The author applies ethos to convince her audience that the advice she gives is founded on individual familiarity in addition to awareness, and are thus sincere. By telling people her profession and the amount of time she has been engaging people concerning clued-up survives, she convinces them about the credibility of her claims (Turkle 59).

Turkle uses pathos technique to try and make her audience miserable concerning the absence of dialogues in the current civilization. To effect this, she uses the story of the aged woman and the mechanical seal. The old lady finds comfort in narrating to the seal about her experiences since the seal mimics ersatz pleasantness (Turkle 61). The experience induces ordinary compassion in place of the woman's dementia, a hurtful sense that the audience then faults on the seal. Sherry's claim begins to seem sensible since, through delay, the whole machinery befits accountable for the despondency.

Sherry uses logos to rationally explain her views concerning digital conversation. For instance, she says that despite social media prompting people to share their feelings, people hesitate to share any self-reflection because they lack trust (Turkle 61). She argues that actual dialogues possess the constituent of reliance and are thus practical. She uses this appeal since logic that is supported by facts is hard to disown. Anyone who opposed such claims had to accept them since they are logic.

Turkle argues that digital technologies cannot be likened to real conversations since they lack trust and self-reflection aspects. Real conversations help people to know their personalities and patience. As much as people may connect through social media, there is a need to create time and talk to each other about our feelings and merely everything. Sherry's suggestion of creating sacred places for actual dialogues is worth noting. People should avoid always being on texts and emails and at least talk while in the kitchen or dining room (Turkle 62). There is a need to validate to children and workmates the significance of real talks. In as much as digital technology is helping us connect to many people and those who are far away, we should not neglect face-to-face dialogues.

Work Cited

Turkle, S. "The Flight from Conversation". The New York Times. (April 12, 2012)