Research Paper on Sustaining Safety and Expansion for Australian Airports: An Update on Advanced Security Measures

Introduction

The main problem for airports in Australia (and aviation in general) is the need to expand their business without compromising security sustainably. It is required that aviation security-risks mitigation measures be dynamic to match the needs of the passengers and the airports at large (Bednarek, 2016). Instead of buying new equipment for every new threat, existing advanced equipment are updated to suit these new threats instead of purchasing them for every new threat. The aviation industry in Australia is an enterprise that necessarily depends on air transport's success as a safe and secure means of transportation by shifting security algorithms (Collins, Hensher, & Li, 2010). Air transport's future in the country is closely linked to the way the civil aviation industry will deal, not only with expected medium-and long-term passenger traffic growth but also to changing passenger expectations which will require fast, user-friendly services, similar to those that they receive in their daily lives.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Customer Satisfaction and Demand for Security in the Australian Aviation Sector

The interconnection between the increase of security demand and ensuring that customer demands are adequately attended to is the biggest issue and obstacle currently facing the aviation industry in Australia. To make the aviation industry competitive and to satisfy potential civil aviation demands, the stresses on maintaining effective security systems must intensify in airports in the country (Forsyth, 2017). The aviation sector continues to face up to this obstacle but is unable to devise secure solutions that jeopardize will not health and security. The problems Australian airports face today and in the future is not seen as a problem but as an incentive for the airlines to explore and to find solutions. The development and management of the evolution of threats of aviation security and safety schemes are fundamental values of aviation that can improve connectivity, tourism and economic growth in international air transport in Australia.

The aviation industry in Australia closely related to policy security advances towards greater efficiency and quality and reduces costs (Collins, Hensher, & Li, 2010). This will, indeed, raise serious questions regarding cybersecurity due to the increase in the use of information systems to manage processes in airports in Australia. An effective security system will be successful only if people in Australia are responsible for following established procedures and are motivated to follow the rules and regulations that increase the management of threats.

Trends in Maintaining the Effectiveness of Airport Security in Australia

Regulators will routinely audit and modify risk reports from different airports in Australia. Besides, airports will maintain and update their protection measures to take into consideration new national threat reports, as well as change them. An airport aviation security system (AVSEC) is a dynamic and interrelated calculation and product asset network, to avoid unauthorized intervention and access in the airport and civil aviation (Forsyth, 2017). In order to reach this goal, airports in Australia have sufficiently prepared to ensure that all security measures, which minimize the risks posed by current and emerging threats, are correctly and successfully implemented.

A proper risk-based security measure applied and acknowledged between airports in Australia, through mutual recognition is supported by an effective and efficient security regime without compromising the basic standards still being provided by Annex 17 ICAO (Graham, 2012). Therefore, an effective security program can be efficient only when people are responsible and empowered to obey defined protocols and to comply with the specified regulations in a dynamic demand environment in Australia. Airports are engaged with police to ensure that security measures remain effective. Different programs have been incorporated based on local specificities to handle their local threats due to geographical and demographic differences in airports in Australia. Based on a changing threat scenario in Australian airports, managements work without jeopardizing the baseline requirements that form the basis for effective and stable international aviation communication, to ensure that security measures remain functional.

Effective execution of security protocols also depends on robust and robust safety culture in the airport environment, leading employees to think and act more securely, supporting and maintaining a resilient risk organization, from senior leadership to all other staff in both safety and non-security processes (Knippenberger, 2010). Police in Australia has many approaches developed to work closely with community members. Airports have to be engaged with the police in order to ensure that security measures remain effective. For instance, In Australia, airport surveillance, insider risk systems, intelligence sharing and international airport conferences are all organized to communicate lessons learned and new ideas.

Key Security Considerations in Australian Airports

People are by far the essential component of the airport and security protection jigsaw in Australia, but sometimes the toughest to manage. For instance, built-in safety culture is required at all levels in all operating areas and all operators employed at an airport. Administration from the top is essential and can inspire workers always to remain vigilant. An AVSEC airport network consists of multiple subsystems varying from passenger and staff screening to establishing a stable air freight and mail supply chain, airport equipment and services. The different security mechanisms as interrelated safety structures maintain the efficiency of these components in airports in Australia (Sonnenburg & Braun, 2017). If one of these subsystems were damaged, the efficiency of the entire AVSEC system could be undermined. Therefore, an AVSEC framework for all airports in the country is operated as a whole, never relying on assets in one component or minimizing the risks of a particular risk.

To ensure that every process is supplied with adequate resources, the available resources should be handled efficiently, proportionately and effectively. Nevertheless, there are places where airports can concentrate on its urgent attention, assets and efforts in order to increase their knowledge of and reaction to their danger, build safety culture and human capacity, and enhance technical capabilities and creativity, that is, one field or subsystem which requires the most attention while considering security measures; Improving monitoring and performance control, and improving collaboration and encouragement from all partners with the common goal of increasing aviation safety. As far as security checks are concerned, we also discuss three different areas. Kerbside (outside the terminal), landside/front (inside the terminal) and air front (part of the airport next to the flight, health and screening tests in the past). These three places would require much attention. The most natural target for terrorist activities would be landside, though, with the ongoing strengthening of air-side protection (Sonnenburg & Braun, 2017).

Internal and External Security Threats to Security in Australia

Both internal and external security issues are critically reviewed in Australia. If an intruder is side-lining software and practices, both systems and procedures put in place to prevent external threats fall into being. The threat from inside and the threat from outside is directly connected. All civil aviation risks should be assessed appropriately, and AVSEC programs sufficiently fitted with hazard management tools (Graham, 2012). The internal risk to Aviation emerges from its staff, whose expertise, duties and exclusive access to safe places provide them with a tactical advantage in the scheduling, training and execution of actions of criminal harm. For risk assessments and prevention steps, there is the unique exposure of aviation to threats, including the use of outsiders in order to bypass safety checks.

When contrast to external threats, the in danger is not considered a separate class, but it is seen as a component in each particular type of threat, which results in a risk evaluation including personal safety standards and physical safety interventions (Forsyth, 2017). This would include the development of a multi-layered protection system, with additional measures, which would account for each measure's shortcomings in combination to prevent a single point of failure, which should include background monitoring, physical controls, instructional and knowledge and reporting process.

The Future of Airport Security in Australia

Prime Minister Scott Morrison has taken action to ensure that Australians have not increased the level of threat at airports since providing a $107 million grant to a new highly skilled anti-terrorism unit. Nine airports, plus 135 Australian Federal Police Officers, will be equipped with extra counter-terrorism support over the next 18 months (Galloway, 2019). The new PORT, with Mk18 Short-Barrel Rifles and body shell cameras for reliable threat detectors, undertake evaluations and airports, will be built with the guidance of ASIO. No additional monitoring for modifications is required for the average passenger. This year's federal budget initially announced a $107 million move to improve airport security, but Mr Morrison gave more details on Friday morning (Xinhuanet, 2019).

The main question to consider, therefore remains whether there will be any improvements in airport security in Australia. It will not be easy, but terminals can and will proactively develop preventive steps, which are essential to ensure safe and secure environments in which market stability and customer service can be ensured. It is not believed that it will be more challenging to keep airports healthy in the future in keeping with what the above prospects. Nevertheless, it would not be more difficult for those running AVSEC structures to ensure secure airports if we recognize the difficulties currently and in the future for aviation sectors, coupled with expected traffic development, increasing perceptions of passengers and guaranteeing the efficacy of security measures without losing performance.

A higher number of variables will have to be protected, for instance, increased knowledge of the existence and rates of the danger of attacks, the implementation of successful and permanent security measures and maintaining an influential security culture that promotes behaviours that enhance the efficiency of the AVSEC process. Airports are changing rapidly, with flaws, challenges and dangers better understood and mitigation strategies built to address security problems and airports protected. However, with the emergence of new flaws and risks, such as technological enablers and cybersecurity, questions regarding airport health and safety do remain and will always be.

Conclusion

The criminal mind continually discovers new and creative ways of achieving results. With the impenetrability of protection and testing techniques, an internal risk dilemma that can be deemed a safer route will be investigated and used to try to obtain illegal results. The shipment of illegal goods through airports and terrorist activities, for instance. Therefore, the security aspect of Australian airports remains changing based on improvements from the governments and regulating bodies that continue to push improvements based on changes in demand and threats.

References

Bednarek, J. R. (2016). Introduction: Airports, Cities, and the Jet Age. Airports, Cities, and the Jet Age, 1-9. doi:10...