Introduction
The criminal justice agency has in the past implemented several policies such as the known body-worn cameras (BWC) as a device to improve the efficiency of the law enforcing agencies and the delivery of their services to the public. The body-worn cameras provide the audio-visual connections which help reinforce the service delivery regarding responsibility and intelligibility to the law enforcers, as well as assisting to minimize the conflict often encountered between the law enforcers and the local members of the society (Miller & Toliver, 2014).Significantly, implementations of the body-worn policy programs by the law enforcement agencies are on the rise following the urgency to curb the increasing rates of service delivery to the public. Notably, the law enforcement agencies are mandated to employ the body-worn cameras programs tends to bring the people closer to the police regarding the service delivery.
The BWCs in a critical device that could be integrated into the jurisdiction problem-solving strategy to holistically engage the community with the aim of increasing the aspect of communication between the law enforcers and the people they serve (Katz et al. 2015). On the other hand, the body-worn cameras fitted with the audio-visual devices have recorded all the activity at the crime scene on the police conduct and the nature in which they dispense force to the public. Upon the implementation, research indicates the public satisfaction in line with the program and thus records a decrease in the adjudicated complaints. Imperatively, the implementation of the body-worn camera program face challenges in harmonizing the connection between the demanding public goals and objective and massive increase in the technological, and the logistical aspect. The leading policy membership organization to generate a policy aimed at regulating the implementation of the policies. The body-worn program implementation will be supported by the FY 2016 BWC PIP to run the program in the law enforcing agencies.
How the Agency Implemented the Program
The implementation of the BWCs will require the law enforcing agencies to develop an inclusive approach that integrates the BWCs into practical office application, this follows a sequential stage of implementation. The program needs more attention from all stakeholders, political guidance and leadership in partnership with the entire community to generate an input policy plan on the procurement, training, and deployment of the policy implementers. Also, the policy should address the issues on the juvenile delinquencies, human and civil rights, domestic violence and general lawful connected information. The implantation programs focus on the appropriate procedural and tracking approaches to address the pressing issues on the access, analysis, retention, and storage of the audiovisual information as the form of evidence to be used the jurisdiction dispensation as a form and adoption of the digital multimedia evidence (Miller & Toliver, 2014).
For effective implementation of the program the collaboration and support between the relevant authorities like the community, the labor organization to enable the applicants to adopt the appropriate communication arrangement to implement the policy through a direct engagement the advocacy group to help interpret the more profound understanding among the parties (Katz et al. 2015). The policy should directly address the issues pertaining the evidence acquisition, accountability, and discipline in conjunction with the robust data collection method and the use of police legitimacy and the public trust for access by the government agencies. The award recipients required to work closely with the BJA- funded body-worn cameras training and the technical assistance as preceding evaluating the process to the implantation program. Also, the funding will also focus on the procurement of materials, training and the general implementation.
How the Program Was Funded, Including the Funding Organization
The implementation of the program intends to take in various implementation categories including the expansion of the brain worn cameras into the extra-large police agencies, with not less than 1000 sworn officers by the federal fund. Four awards to be anticipated and applicants may be requested to pay not less than $1,000,000 for an estimated total of $4,000,000. The successful applicants will then identify the suitable technique to implement the body-worn cameras policies, practices, and program (Katz et al. 2015). The funds will center on a full expansion of the ongoing programs that intend to use the cameras to maintain steady support for service delivery based on the available resources. Equally, the funding category BJA-2016-9488 seeks to establish and expand the existing body worn programs in the large policy agencies with the sworn officers between 250 and 1000. The twelve wards are likely to pay $600,000 for an estimated $7,200,000 and the applicants to identify the suitable methods of successful implementation of the program. The federal fund awarded to run the application of this project only caters for the 50% of the total costs for the full implementation of the entire plan. The applicants, therefore, must identify where to source the other 50% to fund the project entirely. Notably, the award of more than $250,000 under this solicitation, then the receiver agencies may not use the federal funds to pay salaries and cash bonuses (Miller & Toliver, 2014).
What Needs the Program Was Intended To Affect
The implementation of the body-worn cameras by the law enforcing agency has the significant effect on the nature of service and delivery by the law enforcers and the public. The policy intends to efficiently address the measures to ensure the law enforcement agencies sufficiently implement their mandate. .The applicants to comply with the recommendation of the COPS a body responsible for the implementation of the Body-worn Cameras. Apparently, the program intends to incorporate essential concerns to successfully minimize the conflict involving the law enforcers and the community (Miller & Toliver, 2014). The program seeks to address the consistent inconsistency including the police and the native community members in addressing the human and civil rights issues, domestic violence, violation of the rule of law at the crime scene and general accountability of the law enforcing agencies. Outstandingly, the policy also intends to rapidly affect the concerns about the law imposing officers concerning their confidentiality, safety, competence and universal administrative issues as well as managing the police expectation and the public. The program also addresses the partnership with the associated criminal justice experts and the judiciary to efficiently support the effective implementation of the policy. Besides, the system also seeks to address the issue of constant missing of data for the adjudication of the case to provide the evidence, the total number of the sworn personnel and their daily interaction with the public for accountability.
References
Miller, L., & Toliver, J. (2014). Implementing a body-worn camera program: Recommendations and lessons learned. Police Executive Research Forum.
Katz, C. M., Kurtenbach, M., Choate, D. E., & White, M. D. (2015). Phoenix, Arizona, Smart Policing Initiative. Evaluating the Impact of Police Officer Body-Worn Cameras. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance, US Department of Justice.
Cite this page
Research Paper on Body-Worn Program Implementation. (2022, Apr 15). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/research-paper-on-body-worn-program-implementation
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- Cases Overview Examples
- Incarceration and Transitions to Adulthood among Urban Youth
- Critical Essay on Letter from Birmingham Jail: Equality Movement
- Research Paper on Crime Scene Investigators
- ACA Tax Credits & Out-of-Pocket Limits: Healthcare Benefits for Middle-Class Americans - Essay Sample
- Essay Sample on Civil & Criminal Cases: Comparing Procedures
- Reducing Recidivism: Examining Transitional Procedures and Programs for Successful Prison Re-Entry