Presidential vs Radical Reconstruction: Equality vs Denied Rights - Essay Sample

Introduction

Presidential reconstruction was based on the idea of individuality, especially during the implementation of its laws. It created the laws, which denied some rights, specifically the black resident who was living in the southern states hence making them provide continued labor in the plantation farm of the white people. On the other hand, radical reconstruction calls for the equality of all the people from different races regardless of their color. This was evident as it provided equal opportunities to all the people, especially when it comes to matters relating to the distribution of resources from one place to another. Presidential Reconstruction gave the powers of land ownership to the army; hence, they were the ones who decided how to distribute it to the people of the southern state.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Presidential reconstruction was also based on racism. This was evident when it comes to the issue relating to voting rights. It only provided a chance for the white race while denying the black people their fundamental right to vote. Moreover, presidential reconstruction come up with certain laws known as black codes, which favors the side of the white people as compared to the black people in various ways, for instance, the blacks in the southern states were expelled from the army while more whites were being hired hence making the black people become jobless. Also, On the other side, radical reconstruction did not bother about the issue of racism as it provided a chance to all races to exercise their rights regardless of their different races.

Which Reconstruction (Presidential or Radical) was more Challenging for the Southern States to Fulfill? Why was it more challenging?

Presidential reconstruction was more challenging as compared to radical reconstruction, especially to the resident who was living in the southern region. This is simply because it enacted laws that were based on racism. Racism was drawn when the black people were imposed on slavery, especially by those who were in power. The black people were supposed to provide continued labor in the lands of the white people hence leading to violation of their fundamental rights.

Which of the Reconstructions (Presidential or Radical) Provided more to Benefit the Freedmen? Why?

Radical reconstruction was mostly preferred by the freedmen in the southern state due to various reasons. Firstly, the reconstruction assisted them by ensuring that it was enacting laws that protected them from being discriminated against by the white race through racism. The fundamental rights of the black people in the southern state since they were treated equally with the white people regardless of their race. Also, radical reconstruction was considered beneficial to the freedmen more so in the southern state since its major implementation included the issue of establishment of more public schools so as to enable people to acquire adequate knowledge, which will help them to eliminate the issue of racism amongst themselves hence leading to unity.

Also, radical reconstruction campaigned for equality in terms of political rights where all people would be free to exercise their political rights, such as the ability to express themselves whenever they are faced with problems. Furthermore, radical reconstruction calls out for taking initiative actions upon those who violate human rights in order to create a just society. Also, radical reconstruction was considered to have benefited the freedmen in the southern state since it aided in the construction of infrastructures such as roads, which were useful in their economic growth.

Radical reconstruction was viewed as beneficial among the freedmen because it freed them from discrimination, such as slavery. It also provided them with the right to get access to facilities such as foods and housing, which could help them to sustain their lives.