Paper on Investigating China's Fashion & Beauty Wanghong Economy: Impact & Implications

Research 1

The title of the research is a general topic and not appropriate for research since the research is focused on fashion and beauty Wanghong. The title should have mentioned the key points of the research and be specific. 'Investigating the phenomenon of fashion and beauty Wanghong economy in China' could have been a specific appropriate title for the research. The research is well introduced by bringing the concept of the Wanghong economy in the context. The authors introduce the impact of the concept in China through referring and sourcing evidence statistics from reliable CBNData source. In the introduction section, the author's arguments are based on their own understanding of the concept and its impact without referencing from other researchers or information sources like articles.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The authors have excellently defined the key terms and concepts such as Wanghong, Wanghong economy, and the fashion and beauty Wanghong, and the associated concepts and theories. However, the definitions are not well integrated into the paper as the literature review has defined terms that are just listed. This makes the literature review to be uncomprehensive since the definitions are not coherently linked to each other. The literature review should have a good content flow that is linked to each other comprehensively.

The extent to which the authors engage other researchers' arguments is moderate. They are able to incorporate the other works' arguments with their arguments to write comprehensive research. Also, the in-text citations are appropriately used. The key points such as the impact of the Wanghong are well supported with the appropriate sources and are well explained. The empirical issues and points raised from the data collection are related to the research and helpful in supporting the author's arguments. Moreover, the theoretical reasoning in the empirical basis is reasonable, sound, and theoretically correct. However, the empirical basis has some bias in how the interview is structured since the empirical analysis lacks the use of statistics and relies only on the interview responses which seem to be more dependent on the interviewees perception and attitudes. The analysis of the empirical basis is sound and reasonable. The interpretations align with the theoretical explanation of the content. The interpretation for supporting their arguments are believable since they make sense and relatable.

The conclusion is illogical and not related to the key points of the research and it does not summarize the discussed content. The whole conclusion should be replaced with a more logical conclusion that mentions the topic of the research, the key arguments, and the key interpretations, and finally, link the interpretations with the thesis statement of the title of the research. The paper lacked typos, and the citation adhered to required referencing standards. However, some few grammatical mistakes are notable in the paper.

Research 2

Why is the spy-cam pornography phenomenon on the rise in South Korea?

The title of the research is appropriate for the research since the research content is focused on the spy-cam pornography and on the South Korea context. The introduction, the literature review, and the empirical section align with the topic. The author introduces the phenomenon concept and defines what the concept entails, and links the concept with the setting of South Korea to create a logical and comprehensive introduction. In the literature review, statistical data and other researchers key arguments are well integrated into the context. All the key points are supported with proper referencing and the used statistics recently and from reliable primary sources. The extent to which the other sources are referenced is notably high since every paragraph with a key argument or issue is correctly cited. The literature review arguments flow well and are well linked, comprehensive, and excellently integrated into the explanation. The content is well sectioned, titled, and is coherently placed.

The authors' arguments in the literature review are reasonable and theoretically relatable. The authors' main argument points are clearly written and supported with reasonable arguments of the author and from primary sources of other researcher's articles, from the empirical analysis, and from reliable statistics sources. The data collection interviews provided information and views about the existence of the phenomenon. Prevalence of the cyber phonography issue could have been provided to affirm the authors' argument of the existence of the phenomenon in the research settings.

The empirical analysis is reasonable and logic in how the authors link the collected information with the paper's major argument. Also, the collected information is theoretically relatable and relevant to the context. The analysis and the discussion were detailed and extensive and with no empirical faults. However, the empirical section could have been sufficiently supported by statistical data. Using interviews offered information that was biased on the interviewee's attitudes and perceptions. The authors' argument on how the online spy relates to feminism is sound. Also, the authors' suggestion of handling the matter is reasonable and seems effective.

The conclusion is logical and relevant in how it summarizes the research and contains the key points outlined in the paper. The titling format of the major topic and the minor topics is appropriate. All the content is relevant and well placed, thus, there lacks the section which needs to be rectified, expanded or condensed. The grammar is excellent and the paper lacks typos and incoherence. Therefore, the research can be rated to of high quality since it adhered to most research writing guidelines.

Research 3

Comparisons: What are the late-married mechanism behind China and Hong Kong?

First, the title is grammatically incorrect, unclear and ambiguous. It leaves the reader wondering what is a late-married mechanism or what did the other want to mean by using the term mechanism. Also, the mechanism should have the article 'is' as 'ae' is grammatically incorrect. The introduction of the topic is appropriate since the author introduces marriage and finally bring out the context of late marriage. The content is focused on reasons for the delay and what is causing the delay. This should have been the basis of the title which could have been specific and entail the key term reasons or the causative factors of late marriage. Also, the content is compared for China and Hong Kong as per the title.

In the literature review, the authors integrate other researchers' ideas into the context. The key arguments of research are well cited and the used sources are relevant and credible. The author also defines the key terms of marriage and the late-marriage phenomenon.

The given reasons for the delayed marriage are reasonable and relatable. The research compared the results of the countries against the existing theoretical information concerning the issue. The survey method of data collection was the most appropriate for the research. The statistical data sources used in the empirical section are reliable since they were sourced from credible sites such as the Census and Statistics Department. The theoretical basis was done exceptionally well and data from both countries were compared against each other. The supporting explanations are relatable to real life situations. Also, the analysis and interpretations of the collected data are sound and logical and well aligned with the author's major argument and the thesis statement.

Apart from the grammatical error in the title, the rest of the paper had very few grammatical mistakes. The paper lacked typos, run-on sentences and making the overall rate of the high. However, there was the presence of the wrong word choice 'mechanism'. Throughout the paper, there was no explanation of any mechanism. This further makes the title to be more irrelevant and with the wrong word choice. The topic could have just been 'What are the causes of late marriage in China and Hong Kong?' Also, some paragraphs are too short and some points are scattered in the content and ought to be condensed into comprehensive paragraphs.

No section that requires to be expanded or condensed since the content is relevant and appropriate for the research. However, the term mechanism should be eliminated since it is creating high ambiguity in the topic and in the research questions. The paper was excellently sectioned and titled bringing out the comprehensives of the author argument and the research paper flow.

Research 4

First, the research lacks a title to inform the reader what the content is about. The reader begins to read the paper without a hint of the authors' argument. Lack of a title is a big failure of the research even if the content was aligned to the author's major argument. The second paragraph of the introduction is irrelevant and ought to be condensed. The authors bring data analysis or discussion-like statement at the start of the paper. The introduction lacks the thesis statement and the mention of the paper's content or the authors' major argument. The paper seems to be focused on the relation of cultural identities and languages in HongKong. This should be the basis of the title of the research. The extent to which the authors referenced other researchers' works is moderate and the primary data sources used are credible. Also, the author tries to define a language, cultural identity, and cultural-language relation.

However, the paper had key research structure issues that do not meet the standard requirements of the research paper writing. The paper was not sectioned into major sections such as the introduction, literature reviews, empirical and research data collection, and the conclusion. The content was scattered in the paper with no coherency, logical flow making the paper lack comprehensiveness.

The paper lacks the analysis section that will analyze the collected empirical information in depth. There are no author's interpretations and the integration of the collected information with the authors and other researchers' arguments. Therefore, the analysis and discussion section should be added and well discussed.

The content quality of the paper was ruined by the lack of coherence of the key sections of research. The authors analyze data on some graphs without mentioned how the data was obtained. Also, the author introduces the empirical data without breaking from the literature review discussion. The interpretations are shallow and ought to be expanded to sufficiently bring out the authors argument. The authors link the data collection method with shallow interpretations without sectioning and differentiating the two sections. Moreover, the paper had very few grammatical errors and typos.

The reader cannot rate the relevancy and the logic of the authors' argument because the paper lacks a title, a thesis statement, research objectives, and questions, or a highlight of the key authors' argument. The overall rate of the research paper is poor despite the lengthy paper. The paper ought to be restructured to bring coherence and comprehensiveness of the research paper.