Paper Example on Philosophical Ideologies

Paper Type:  Essay
Pages:  6
Wordcount:  1507 Words
Date:  2022-04-19


The term happy and happiness is presented in the writing of moral philosophy. Nearly everyone assumes that happiness is one of the most vital goals, not the main purpose of life. Happiness is thought as a sense that many Greeks are more than just a state of healing or happiness. Epicureanism and stoicism are two real philosophies that are not aimed at establishing truths but then live in wisdom and happiness.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Stoicism's pleasure is "the fullness of all good" power for all who live well; accomplishment according to goodness; the living creature is useful. They continue to believe that man is capable of doing so. The thought of Ecicurean happiness is freedom, friends and life-threatening. He said it was our ability to see what makes people happy and they are looking for contentment in the wrong place.

Regardless, the feeling of happiness is at least possible to be content in different ways one can be more contented than others and a year's life is better-off than another year. We know a good mood or one of the different color symbols. Happiness is sometimes used by demonstrations such as, with, about, and at. Obviously, one can be happy when he is not happy with the substantial thing, though we cannot say that a person is happy if he is not happy with anything in his life. Unlike sometimes he should be advised, one can be content even if he does not want something, but fulfilling some desires is desirable.

Epicurus was one of the early Greek philosophers that gave many illustrations of contentment. His friends, liberty and important life are his ideas of happiness. He asks us how to see what joys us and we find happiness in a bad place. He thought of a natural experience that happiness or gladness was the purpose and use of life. It does not follow from it that cheerfulness is human nature; the joy rather than the reward part of wisdom is trying after a meaningful and careful way.

Epicurus firmly believes that everyone has the potential to attain true contentment. The only difficulty is that we have a propensity to find it in every bad place. He supposed that our longing to be content and enjoying life must not increase any feelings of error. Life gives us happiness, so we need to live perfect. This is the biggest mistake they have, according to Epicurus, that people are happy and many money say that satisfaction is the most important thing in life. We can as well be gentle and careful with simple home, simple clothes, drinking water plus wine and having regular meals. The basic concept in his viewpoint is that we cannot appreciate what can be ours? Therefore, we are more interested in physical things than holy things. We are looking for non-profit, loss of ads. So we changed our genuine needs and things like cars, clothes, beautiful houses, furniture and much more. But if Greek philosophers such as Epicurus tried to show that we needed only three things to be contented, they are Freedom, Friends, and an assessed life.

Epicurus created and valued a great deal of friendship. Friendship dances with people around the world, telling us everything to wake up and take note of everyone. It is also important to arrange plans for friendship and scientifically plan friendship. "People have become more successful in the feeling of anxiety because of the environment that makes the best relationships possible, because it is difficult, even if not a United Nations friend, where possible, avoiding communication, and wherever beneficial for doing so, the king's care is needed. "When Epicurus was 35 years old, he bought a new home and invited some of his friends to live with him. He told them that friends are the main reason for happiness. When we are sad, when we eat and go, we need friends by talking. Epikur said we should not eat, but we should have a simple meal with a special friend. The friends of the friend do not escape the pleasure and the qualities that are spoken. Being uneducated without friends is full of invisible tactics and fears; the very reason advises us to protect friendships; When these are available; our spirits are helped and cannot be shared in the hope of finding happiness.

Freedom is a secondary part of the pleasure of freeing oneself from the restless life of Athens. He and his friends plan to travel the world and live a simple life. For the life of Epicurus, the simplicity of joy is worthy and is called freedom, meaning freedom in its meaning: "To enjoy the most important fruit is freedom."

On the subject of independence and epicureanism, the students' goals are to be prepared for wonders. Above all, it is unbelievable to see that Epicurus is less ill to emphasize human rights. I need friends because it matters to me. Like Epicurus, pleasure is our last end, and we need true friendship, then we must end it. Although there is no uncertainty of independent suffering in Epicurean theory, there is a complaint that can be raised for the sake of friendship. In addition, we can see from the Epicurean exercise that they have avoided some social relationships. However, there are some tensions as the Epicureos first began a popular dating, and especially given the fact that the Epicurus claims that a wise man will love his friend like himself.

According to the stoic's theory that virtue is good is enough for happiness, we find that quality is not enough for happiness. But how good is it for happiness? For these, we need a special idea of just goodness, which is good, because other things being viewed should not be considered good, but not individually. The concept of support used by the theologians is an absolute goal, and it is only hoped they will announce a very meaningful idea. Lewis suggests a countercultural thought that we have no 'right to happiness.' It seems like such a nasty idea that we have no right to happiness. When I first read the paper, I was resolute to find a problem with it. After reading it a number of times though, I think that I appreciate his point and have to concur that we do not have any right to happiness. Someone should live by nature, so he/she is happy.

For people, it has a good thing and the natural existence of learning to do things. If you exist, your life and your nature should have your life in a good way. A good life based on nature is a happy life. The Stoic philosophers rely on happiness that is the sum of all good strengths to live well; to fulfill the good agreement, living organisms get enough benefits. They also believe that one can differentiate between the doctrine of Aristotle that a person not only needs the ability of a person to enjoy his desires but also needs great success to have happiness. "Death is the end of life; ah, why should life all labour be?" (86-87). The essential idea here is that, if death is inevitable, why should someone bust the hump while alive? Why work so hard if all people will end up in the same position? There is definitely a convinced logic to this. However, when people are healthy and happy, they habitually manage to overlook this essential fact and not focus on it.

Estoism is more rigorous. Cicero may say that "in the heavens, the philosophy of ensuring that the person who obeys his laws - will always be a happy person," to which people seem to be part of his nature. The ability to think is the difference between people and animals. For the right reason, you try to reach the end of its nature. Although it is fun, it can be said that he leads to a good life, so good that can be described as a perfect cause. So he touched the satisfaction. Therefore, the reason is unique to achieve a peaceful and happy life. Stoic believes that achieving perfection brings good luck. This can be done through natural existence or a good life career. Part of Stoic's meeting is teaching fun, part of the passionate craving for desire. Stoic Castoff emphasizes the importance of happiness and pain. "The happy person is satisfied with his current voice, no matter what." He says that a person of unstable power will be happy even under pursuit, even with a weapon. The well-being of a happy person is completely lacking in the bad effects of fate. He said that one should show the human nature that he should associate with animals, especially his ability to think and see things, and his role as a student. This allows you to live happily with joy.

Works Cited

Carstairs, G. M. "A land of lotus-eaters?" Contact, vol. 23, no. 1, 1968, pp. 7-12.

ROBERTS, ADAM. "TENNYSON'S 'ULYSSES' AND 'LOTOS EATERS': SOURCES IN VIRGIL'S AENEID V." Notes and Queries, vol. 46, no. 1, 1999, pp. 60-62.

Cite this page

Paper Example on Philosophical Ideologies. (2022, Apr 19). Retrieved from

Free essays can be submitted by anyone,

so we do not vouch for their quality

Want a quality guarantee?
Order from one of our vetted writers instead

If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:

didn't find image

Liked this essay sample but need an original one?

Hire a professional with VAST experience!

24/7 online support

NO plagiarism