Paper Example on Media's Role in U.S. National Security Since WWII

Quiz 1

Political stability and national security have been significant aspects of the American people since the end of both World War II and the Cold War. According to the author if this material, the primary purpose is to enlighten the citizens on the role of the media in highlighting the issues of national interest and security. Since President Truman established a formal structure of the national security and ratified by Congress, the problem has always been the top concern in American history. The author tries to explain how the emergence of the terrorism and terror wars shattered the optimism and hope for peace and security of the American people after the cold war.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The material chapters 1, 2, and 5 present a fundamental understanding of the protection of state interests. The security of the American people and the world as a whole came under serious threat by the emerg\ence of terror war both from internal and external quarters. National security and interest combine the military, terrorist, extremist, and economic risks that the US must arrest to achieve their dream. However, the author criticizes the ability of the United States to prioritize fighting all these wars from different quarters with limited resources. National security is something that Americans started deliberating even before the Nation came to exist. Some of the main topics that are coming out from this article include world terrorism, national security, political instability, and economic challenges.

Quiz 2

In this chapter 01, the author tries to address the establishment of national values and national security of the United States. The author discusses various questions that have been affecting the national interests and security in the United States since its establishment by President Truman up to the 21st century. First, the author highlights the policies that the US presents before both domestic and international arenas. According to the author, the United States observes the philosophical, moral, and legal to make the perpetuate their issues of public good. For the American security system to thrive, foreign policy plays an influential role. How the US interacts or relates with other countries in both diplomatic and political aspects promotes the empowerment of its national security. When the national security policy and the foreign policy find a consensus, the US gets a non-crisis situation. However, if the two different policies overlap, it creates a case of a crisis.

Another question that the author raises concerning national security is the value system. According to the author, the US society has grown through severe political crisis to the current status. The value system has a lot of leanings on the Judeo-Christian doctrines, the Anglo-Saxon legacy, and other philosophical backgrounds from the American Revolution. The declaration of independence and the American Constitution have also fostered strong values and principles in the American system. Those values have been so instrumental in the establishment of the domestic policy and how they interact with other global policies.

The author also raises the question of how the American values of national security have evolved. During the early years of the Nation, there seemed to be very little need to translate their values to fit in the external world. That is to say that the interest of the US never went beyond their shores. However, after a series of wars and the Revolution, the US redeemed its image and realized the importance of exercising their values beyond the borders.

Quiz 3

Under chapter 02 of this material, the key concept is the international competition and limitations of the United States. The author tries to incorporate the context in which the US national security applies. As the author correctly points out, the theory of "who is who in the international arena is one of the most influential theories in this chapter." The article portrays the US as the most potent country regarding its economic and military strengths. However, having such potential power does not reflect on the US ability of real power. That has seen the US lack the ability to influence the policy outcomes in the international sphere.

According to the source materials, the lack of real power to influence the world presented itself on September 11, 2001, when terrorists attacked the New York world trading center. The international system involves more than 190 states and many other non-state actors that create an intricate network that strains the US power and goals. It is evident that the US security power in the international platform is limited, even though it is a superpower. Other Anti-US forces of power such as China, France, Great Britain, Russia, Japan, and India are equally promoting their ideologies and interests in the international system. It is also a question of the US unique culture of blending many scientific and economic talents to create a future that is socioeconomic development.

Another critical idea that the author presents is the fact that the US must be prudent and cautious about how and whom they spend their limited resources to achieve their national security dream. That has seen the US struggle to control regional powers, a struggle that has seen its economic ability to reduce in recent times. The author equally points out that the US democratic approach also requires it to employ negotiations and diplomacy to deliver on its national security goal. The democratic principles need the US to compromise, recognize, and be mindful of other states and their national interests. That means it must have a shared responsibility on what binds her with other common purposes.

The current state of the US alliances has taken shape in recent times with the US being cautious of the entangling unions. The author looks at this idea as one that affects the external policy of the United States. The US tries her level best to distance herself from even some of the traditional allies such as Europe with whom they share some cultural ideologies. After World War I and II, the US still kept their isolation from Europe and other unwelcome allies to enable them to achieve their national security goals. According to the author, the US has always maintained the concept of balancing with her partners to ensure that it stays on the right track of its dreams.

Quiz 4

The primary interpretations of this material are the principles of Democracy. The article gives a historical evolutionary journey of Democracy in the United States and the laws under which it operates. The source explains various policies such as the distribution of power, democratic faith, cultural diversity, and the messianic spirit. The writer presents all these factors as the secret behind the healthy democratic system and the prevalence of the American national dream these principles equally provides every American citizen with an opportunity of socioeconomic empowerment and political liberties that have seen the US thrive in their system of governance.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the author addresses the historical establishment of national interests and national security. The values system also provided various principles and values that Americans stand for in their quest to achieve their national dream. It is equally significant to note that the policies that the US put in place have seen them gather a reasonable level of potential power to control the rest of the world. However, it also gives the limitations of the American power that has failed to influence the external world because of different forces and their respective affiliation. The US has always tried to balance among all these complex systems to ensure that their focus remains right.

References

Krasner, S. D. (2008). Defending the national interest: Raw materials investments and US foreign policy. Princeton University Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=OhhY_RcoHA8C&oi=fnd&pg=PP15&dq=National+Interests+and+National+Securit&ots=1lwqWzAae5&sig=8o1bmAqZRE-KymqzF4S989hqKcs

Weldes, J. (1996). Constructing national interests. European Journal of International Relations, 2(3), 275-318. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1354066196002003001