Paper Example on Joanne's Right to Safety and Stable Childhood

Introduction

All children have the right to safety, and stable Childhood, and Joanne is not an exemption. Notably, while it is the parent and different cares who have the primary responsibility of caring for their children, the state, and local authorities have outreaching responsibilities not only to safeguard children but also to promote their welfare as well (Moyse, n.d.). Several statutory regulations have been implemented, including the 1989 and 2004 children Act, which have provided clear guidelines on children's protection and overall children's welfare (Children and families acted in 2014, n.d.). The state and other related non-governmental organisations have a specific mandate and responsibility concerning children's protection, needy children, and welfare on children who are suffering, likely to suffer, or those who have been earlier subjected to suffering. Notably, the responsibilities are regardless of the location of the child. Moreover, various multinational agencies and family service plans (FSP) have not been isolated in the fight to promoting child welfare (Children and families acted in 2014, n.d.). Therefore, through the incorporation of various children safeguard, and welfare aspects including professional judgments, anti-discriminatory policies and sound Family Service Plan aspect, the paper aims to analyze the concept of children protection using Joanne's case.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Stockholders Role

While multiple stakeholders play a significant role in safeguarding and promoting children's welfare, protecting children from significant harm is a societal responsibility. Everyone who comes across a child has the responsibility to play under such guidelines, including.

• Protecting the children from mistreatment
• Prevention of children impairment or health development as in the case of Joanne
• Ensuring that children are brought up under the conducive and safe environment
• Taking related actions to ensure that all children have the best results while growing.

The second guideline is connected to the case of Joanne. She is undergoing multiple development checks to help her achieve better growth and development. Despite being able to perform other essentials personal responsibilities like dressing up herself and toileting, Joanne is still physically independent. Therefore, through sound incorporation of the child protection guidelines, Joanne's overall welfare would no doubt be improved. Notably, for Joanne's situation, the sole responsibility of protection and welfare promotion lies with the community pediatrician, who would assist her make her needs known through the help of a speech-language therapist.

Various local agencies, including healthcare settings, the police service unit, also have a responsibility under section 11 of the children act 2004 that they take necessary considerations to protect and safeguard children on a course of their routine functions (Phelan, 2015). Moreover, section 10, of the same Act stipulates that multiple agencies charged with the responsibility of child protection need to corporate to achieve the objective collectively. Notably, the co-operation should exist from the grassroots level to strategic and operational levels (Tunstill et al., 2010). All practitioners working with the children protection-related agencies should ensure that they carry out their responsibility in such a manner that is consistent with statutory guidelines, and the employers should see that total compliance is achieved. Children Act 2017, have stipulated how agencies must corporate together while incorporating new duties to their groups through clinical commission, which will be relevant in achieving effective children protection (Seth & Srivastava, 2017). It can be noted that the concept of child protection and welfare is a global campaign that has been given a greater priority since their protection and welfare promotion would promote a better society tomorrow.

Concept of Children Vulnerability and Maltreatment

Child abuse occurs across many societies and cultures, and this action has remained critical as far as public health is concerned. Notably, child maltreatment includes neglect, emotional abuse, and sexual abuse. According to the global health report on child maltreatment, approximately 20000 children under the age of 3, translating to about 28% of all the victims were victims of maltreatment in the across the globe in 12 months (Stone, 2007). Moreover, children between 3 and 5 ages formed another 20% of the vulnerability. However, the most often maltreatment of children has been neglect. However, all forms of abuse have been witnessed. Globally, most cases of child maltreaters have been family members assuming a percentage of between 30-40% or family acquaintances 55%, and only 10% of the maltreatment cases are from strangers (Stone, 2007).

It is often difficult to determine a child who is vulnerable to maltreatment. However, there exist multiple risk factors that society and individuals can be wary of. For instance, child factors, including young children, children with disabilities, or any related health problem, children already in the process of abuse (Stone, 2007). Drawing close attention to Joanne's case, he may be vulnerable to maltreatment not only due to the current health problem she is undergoing but because of her age as well. Joanne is constantly frustrated due to the difficulties she has due to communication skills, and this health condition can make her vulnerable to maltreatment. Therefore, Joanne needs much protection to escape maltreatment since if she falls a victim of this circumstance, it would be difficult to ascertain whether she was maltreated due to the difficulty she is facing in making her need to be known.

There exist parental factors that can make a child vulnerable to maltreatment, including young parents, poorly informed parents concerning parenting, mentally unhealthy parents under substance abuse, and antisocial disorders. Notably, the antisocial nature of a parent or parents may make a child develop a fear factor and never to disclose when they have been victimised (Gary, 2017). Joanne's parents are not old, and the good news is that Joanne is in close contact with her brother Boyd. Therefore, she can make her needs known through his brother and thus close attention. Young parents who are not wary of the basics of good parenthood should undergo the necessary training to ensure that they are acquitted with better strategies of protecting and improving their children's welfare (Gary, 2017).Parents should closely monitor their Children's development through the incorporation of social and cognitive skills, which may prove significant for later success in class, and this may only be supported by good parenting techniques referred to as responsive parenting (Gary, 2017). Young parents should be taught how to be responsive in situations that they notice that their children are maltreated (Gary, 2017). Responsiveness is the concept of supportive parenting, which has been documented across multiple theories and study frameworks, including socio-cultural research. Notably, responsiveness plays a significant role in laying a strong foundation for children to develop optimally (Gary, 2017). Joanne's parents have taken necessary responsive initiatives to ensure that Joanne's concerns are attended to. Parents who provide positive affection and high levels of the warmth of responsive in ways that are contingently linked to a child's have been tipped to offer maximum protection to their child and overall promotion of their welfare both at home and in school settings.

The move has an intern made children free with their parents, and reporting cases of suspected vulnerability has not been a big concern for such parents (Gary, 2017). Other contextual factors of vulnerability include single parenthood, family violence, and financial and emotional stress. Despite facing some challenges, both Joanne's parents have been supportive, and they have sort for related assistance form their good friends. The family also has financial stress, making them seek support from their good friends which have enabled them protect Joanne from maltreatment and her welfare. Environmental factors of vulnerability and maltreatment include poverty, social isolation, and community violence (Gary, 2017).

Safety Assessment in Childs Welfare (Joanne)

Child maltreatment, protection, and welfare is a universal and widespread concern. Three out of 1000 children are being abused annually, though the figure is dependent on the type of abuse. Moreover, the chances of repeated abuse of a child that has already undergone abuse have been tipped to be high (Callahan & Swift, 2018). For instance, multiple research has revealed that about 60% of sexually abused children have reported subsequent sexual revictimisation (Deb, 2015). Therefore, to prevent a child from being victimised, child healthcare workers must make significant decisions on the best practices of protecting the children. As earlier mention, it is not the sole responsibility of the parents to protect their children; they only have the primary responsibility. However, it is everyone's responsibility to ensure that children are protected from abuse and their welfare promoted for the overall good of the society (Kolko & Vernberg, 2017).

Notably, to determine the extent of the child's protection, it is essential to determine the immediate child safety. A child may not be vulnerable to direct abuse, but their condition can accelerate impending abuse, just like in the case of Joanne and thus subsequent revictimisation. Various forms of assessment are always undertaken before making such decisions on how best children can be protected (Sharma, 2015). The vulnerability or immediate danger must be determined to ascertain the level of protection the child needs. The decision models used in ascertaining a child safety concern are always incorporated with risk assessment models. However, distinguishing risk assessment instruments from the safety assessment instrument is significant since they serve different purposes.

Risk assessment instruments help professionals in assessing future risk and vulnerability that a child may be exposed to, and thus, appropriate measures can be undertaken. In sum, risk assessment in a non-immediate future safety (Gray, 2015). On the other hand, child safety assessment instruments help various professionals to determine whether a child has recently been victimised, harmed recently, or maybe harmed soon. In performing this responsibility, the professional would ask such questions, including, is the child vulnerable to maltreatment? Has the child been recently maltreatment, or has he undergone revictimisation? (Gray, 2015). Therefore, such tools can be used for the case of Joanne, who can be assessed as being highly vulnerable to victimisation. Therefore, she should be given the high degree of protection she deserves owing to her condition of inexpression.

Family Support Plan and Role of Multi-Professional

Family support plans or services are primarily aimed at helping and nurturing safe care for children through the incorporation of various connectivity entry points in acquiring information for families experiencing vulnerability, as in the case of Joanne. Any person is permitted to contact a family service plan for assistance and advice on how children can be adequately protected from maltreatment (Klassen et al., 2013). The responsibility of family support plan organisations is to assess vulnerable families to help them meet out their needs. Professionals have the opportunity to interact with different families to adequately determine their needs ranging from financial to protection needs...