Paper Example on Australian Bill: Ensuring National Security

The Australian bill was a strategy that was put in place as a five-year outgrowth of coming up with a modern way of ensuring national security according to their attorney general: The Hon Christian Porter (Buchanan, 2018). The bill that was passed in 2018 was to ensure that other countries do not interfere with their daily undertakings of the government of Australia. The bill was passed on 28th June 2018 but received impressive acceptance the following day subject to the majority viands that came forth that day (Buchanan, 2018). On the same day, they also passed another bill that was to work simultaneously with the espionage and foreign affair bill. This bill was known as foreign influence transparency scheme bill 2018 in short FITS bill. This bill was to govern and give matriculation account to persons who wanted to undertake certain obligations on behalf of the foreign dominants in Australia.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The bill changed and brought forth a wide range of offences in the criminal code act introduced in 1995 to target the doings of foreign dominants in Australia. Many changes were brought about to the chapter five of the disciplinary code act (1995) after the bill was passed which included the changing of part 5.2 after which it was entitled "espionage and related offences (Buchanan, 2018)". This was used to criminalize an ample expanse of dealings with information that included processing and receiving information even for unclassified information. A new division was introduced in section 5.2 that contained distinct foreign interference offences which are aimed at targeting crooked affairs with trade secrets on furtherance to a foreign dominant in the country.

It also complimented the intelligence offences by criminalizing adverse conduct that was undertaken by foreign principals who sort to interfere with Australia's way of governance to stave their espionage activities (Buchanan, 2018). The new division also criminalized the provision of base or monetary support to intelligence agencies. The state security (espionage and foreign interference) law saw too many changes in the Australian way of governance. This included:

• Strengthening the existing intelligence offences
• Introduction of new theft of exchange secrets offence to protect the Australian economy from espionage by foreign dominants.
• It is ensured that the law enforcement agencies had the competency to investigate deliberate offences.
• Introduction of a new irk crime for yielding deceitful and ambiguous tiding in the lexicon of security clearance procedure.
• Criminalized exposure of adverse tiding and also saw to it that there is profligacy of expression.
• Reformed offences against the government which included treason to up the protection of Australia's fort and justice.

These changes that were made by the bill that was passed were backed up by the FITS bill that established a frame of reference that would:

• See to it that for a person to undertake a particular activity on account of a foreign dominant one had to be registered by the government of Australia.
• Contain the real privilege for some activities of persons especially those from other dominants that are established in Australia.
• Place adjoining impartation fulfilment of persons especially during the election and other voting periods and many more laws according to FITS bill.

The espionage bill and the FITS have helped Australia in defending their rights to democracy defending themselves from states that exploit other countries (Buchanan, 2018). The set of rules in the laws passed are meant to be adhered to by foreign land that wants to undertake a specific activity in Australia.

Legal and Ethical Issues in the Media industry

In this anecdote, we get to understand that there was an invasion of privacy which is the disclosure of private facts. To perpetuate their reputation and to avoid bashfulness, people specifically choose what aspects of their private lives that they affirm to the public. It's therefore useful that the clues of a person's private life are not disclosed to the public without the person's permission (Patterson, Wilkins & Painter, 2018). In this case, we get to see that the two actors were involved in some affair of which they were not aware that their situation would be exposed to the public. This seemed to be quite a lousy impression simply because neither of them was contacted before posting the same issue. The law prohibits disclosure of such tiding. Most states have a way of dealing with such claims of the public leak. But for one to sue a person for such information, it must have some elements as stated by the law to back them up. These components may include:

• The publicized solidity was a private certitude.
• Public confession of the private actuality.
• The publication of the whole private story is obnoxious to an equitable person of typical susceptibility

These elements guide one in deciding whether to take a step further to make all the matter legal. With all this, the offended party can be able to summon a case with a person that publicized the information. For the publisher also there are several defences to such allegations such as legitimate civic concern, the permission of the party involved and social evidence. Once one has material evidence, one can use them against the litigant (Patterson, Wilkins & Painter, 2018). There is also a conflict of interest. This is a situation whereby a person is involved in numerous concerns and decides to serve only one concern. Typically, this depicts to bearings in which the personal passion of an individual or an institution may adversely tamper with the task owed to make decisions for the perk of the third party. Blabbing confidential scoop to the public can be a tribal allegation (Muller & Birnbauer, 2018). According to various nations, there are distinct vital aspects one has to justify to be fortunate. This generally requires one to have an accurate juridical depiction so that one can have the general idea of the laws that guide you to bait such a case in court.

References

Buchanan, K. (2018). Crimes against the state, Criminal code, Espionage, Freedom of the press, Intelligence activities, Trade secrets.

Muller, D., & Birnbauer, B. (2018). THE ETHICS OF REPORTING NATIONAL SECURITY MATTERS. In the Name of Security Secrecy, Surveillance and Journalism, 77.

Patterson, P., Wilkins, L., & Painter, C. (2018). Media ethics: Issues and cases. Rowman & Littlefield.