Oil Sands, Keystone XL Pipeline: Environmental Issues & Impact - Essay Sample

Introduction

"Oil sands and the Keystone XL Pipeline: Background and Selected Environmental Issues" is one of the website written article that has evolved around the effects of the oil extraction and spillage in Canada. The impact and the interest of the company have been weighed to provide a concrete decision. The website was published on April 14, 2014. By EveryCRSReport.com ("Oil Sands and the Keystone XL Pipeline: Background and Selected Environmental Issues", 2019). The website is reliable as it entails a variety of researches from which the information is retrieved and analyzed. The main objective was to create an awareness of environmental effects upon the Keystone Xl company transport construction in the Canadian gulf coast extraction point. The publication offers a neutral opinion as well as suggestions for what should be done. For instance it argues that through the construction of the pipelines, it would effectively lead to economic boom by increasing security and a steady supply of petroleum in the U.S. as well as increasing job opportunities. On the other hand, the article tends to oppose the construction of pipeline transport, stating that it would lead to climatic changes that lead to a negative impact. Similarly, it has raised the issue of greenhouse gas emission that bisect the issue in stopping the extraction in regards to the evaluation of the President Obama era. The publication, therefore, is not biased and is based on the different researches that have provided factual against the construction of Keystone XL pipelines. The website severely opposes the purpose of the review of "Trump issues new permit for stalled Keystone XL pipeline" ("Trump issues a new permit for stalled Keystone XL pipeline.", 2019).

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

"Trump tries fresh approach with long-delayed Keystone XL pipeline" is vehemently opposed by the Natural Resource Defense Council (NRDC) is also a website that strongly considers the impact of Keystone XL pipeline construction as a significant threat to the environment and human life ("Trump tries fresh approach with long-delayed Keystone XL pipeline", 2019). The website is reliable since a group writes it of people with different views and research knowledge about tar sand oil as well as oil leakage through pipelines. The site provides a brief and well-supported impact of the Keystone XL pipeline construction; for instance, it argues that there is environmental degradation, especially when there is oil leakage. Factual is drafted, showing how explosive the tar sand oil is upon spilling to the habitats and environment in general. On the other hand, the policies of the NRDC strongly oppose the permit by President Trump since the construction endangers humans as well as other living organisms ("What Is the Keystone Pipeline?", 2019). It is, therefore, based on the impacts of construction on the environment without consideration of economic progress. The information source is reliable since it provides the factual analysis gathered from the field and research methodologies.

"Trump's unflagging interest in Pipeline construction" is highly criticized through "U.S. States Department Review doesn't ease worries of Keystone XL pipeline opponents" is a website publication by Matthew Brown from the associate press (Nauman, 2019). The author is not much reliable since he has little backups on the information or the impact and opposition of the Keystone XL pipeline construction and the impact it causes to Canadians and the environment in general. However, it has the basis of the effect of the construction that strongly states that oil spillage river Montana's Missouri will adversely kill the water life as well as humans who tend to use it for consumption. The logics tend to be biased since it is based on the probability of the oil spilling of which it doesn't have to happen. However, it is anticipation that might happen to pose a high risk. The information from the website, therefore, somehow is reliable as it poses some factual logics as well as light evidence of the Keystone XL pipeline construction impact.

Pros and Cons of Keystone XL Pipeline Construction

The main advantage of the Keystone XL pipeline construction includes an increase in job opportunities, thus raising the incomes as well as reducing the number of dependents in the economy. Secondly, promoting government revenue through tax collection and economic activity involved in the expansion of Keystone XL pipeline construction.

The main demerits include environmental degradation and as well as causing adverse climatic conditions due to the increase in greenhouse gas emission and also the destruction of wild animal habitats as well as forests. It also leads to unhealthy consumption of chemical oil substances leading to the malignant growth of cells within the human body hence health problems.

Work Cited

Nauman, T. (2019). Trump's unflagging interest in Pipeline construction. Retrieved from https://intercontinentalcry.org/trumps-unflagging-interest-in-pipeline-construction/

Oil Sands and the Keystone XL Pipeline: Background and Selected Environmental Issues. (2019). Retrieved November 18, 2019, from https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R42611.html

Trump issues new permits for stalled Keystone XL pipeline. (2019). Retrieved from https://apnews.com/d62e3aaa796c402cbe29bcece6cee009

Trump tries a fresh approach with the long-delayed Keystone XL pipeline. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-oil-transcanada-trump/trump-tries-fresh-approach-with-long-delayed-keystone-xl-pipeline-idUSKCN1RA2DG

U.S. State Department review doesn't ease the worries of Keystone XL pipeline opponents. (2019). Retrieved from https://globalnews.ca/news/6100452/keystone-xl-pipeline-montana-alberta-u-s-state-department-review/

What Is the Keystone Pipeline?. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.nrdc.org/stories/what-keystone-pipeline