Hilary Clinton's Speech Critique: An Analysis of Delivery, Content, and Metaphor - Essay Sample

Introduction

This paper provides for a speech critique delivered by a political figure in the United States of America known as Hilary Clinton in the U.N. 4th World Conference on Women Plenary Session. This critique wills to concentrate principally on the delivery style, the content of the speech, and the metaphors used in the speech.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The act of delivering a speech comprises of more than a specialized tone and an assertive voice. Subsequently, the real impression of the message you are trying to convey is mainly made through nonverbal cues. This is the type of communication where the speaker engages in unwritten or verbal language but generates meaning nonetheless.

In Hilary Clinton's speech, she did not maintain constant eye contact, which happens to be one of the most imperative nonverbal cues. It aids in ensuring that the audience remains affianced, making the speaker appear as believable, and opening up communique. Whereas upholding good eye contact is significant, gestures are beneficial when stressing definite points too. They happen to be are an appropriate way to station your tensions, although you need to make sure they are not monotonous. Another nonverbal cue that Clinton did not apply was a closer movement to the audience. More intimate movements to your listeners or smiling are meek ways to build a faster affiliation between you and your audience.

Speech content is an entirely most essential aspect of speech presentation. The choice of words is a vital portion of any form of writing, mainly in content scripting. Hilary Clinton precisely designated appropriate words that helped her upsurge the impression she created on her audience. Moreover, her choice of words aided in creating an intense depiction in the listeners' minds that appealed to the senses.

Additionally, the language Hillary Clinton applied in her "Women's Rights are Human Rights" speech was formal but forthright. This made it quite easy to comprehend by the broad audience. She made the subject she presented relevant to the audience by use of plentiful examples as shown "...women around the world are giving birth, raising children, cooking meals, washing clothes, cleaning houses, planting crops, working on assembly lines, running companies, and running countries." My favorite portion is where Hilary casts her worries by explaining that numerous persons were in question to the motive of that particular conference. In her words, "Let them listen to the voices of women in their homes, neighborhoods, and workplaces. There are some who wonder whether the lives of women and girls matter to economic and political progress around the globe. Let them look at the women gathered here and at Huairou -- the homemakers and nurses, the teachers and lawyers, the policymakers and women who run their own businesses. It is conferences like this that compel governments and peoples everywhere to listen, look, and face the world's most pressing problems. Wasn't it after the women's conference in Nairobi ten years ago that the world focused for the first time on the crisis of domestic violence?" she wanted to explain to the world the essence of respecting women's rights too.

Additionally, Hilary Clinton Made Use of Various Literary Devices as Shown Below

Anaphora- This is the recurrence of a term or phrase at the commencement of succeeding clauses. An instance of this, as used in the speech by Hillary Clinton, is when she said, "I participated in a World Health Organization forum. In that forum..." and "It is a violation of human rights" "families will flourish" "Families rely"

Alliteration- This is the existence of the same letter or sound at the start of next to or closely connected phrases. Some examples of alliteration in this speech would be "We come together in fields and factories, in village markets and supermarkets, in living rooms and board rooms."

The speaker often generates imagery concerning the lives of womanhood in her speech. She managed to do it by repeatedly using wide-ranging enumerations. These enumerations are inclusive of metaphors such as this one "...the contributions women make in every aspect of life: in the home, on the job, in the community, as mothers, wives, sisters, daughters, learners, workers, citizens, and leaders."

Conclusion

In conclusion, I felt that Clinton had a gender partiality in the entire speech. Nevertheless, this can be disputed since there is not any precise quota of the speech that can be cited and claimed to be gender influenced. Consequently, I cannot extremely critique negatively since there were positive aspects too.