Hate Crime Laws Paper Example

The difference in the National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs (NCAVP) and Uniform Crime Report (UCR) Estimates

The estimates differ because the NCAVP was formulated to supplement the UCR program; the two programs are similar. They measure the same subcategory of serious crime; however, the two use different data collection techniques. NCAVP usually collects both incident and aggregate level data from several local members for this report. Bodies gather this detail directly from either the public or survivors’ sources. Normally, survivors get in touch with HIV-affected and LGBTQ anti-violence programs by contacting hotline filling out surveys, linking through community organizing or reporting online. Whereas UCR collects aggregate level data only. Besides, the difference is brought by the ability of NCAVP measuring the offence against both gender, including the LGBTQ community while UCR measures the crime against female only (Farrell et al. 2019)

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

In addition, NCAVP measures comprise both reported and not reported to law implementation. Whereas, UCR captures offences reported to law implementation but gathers only arrest data for sexual assault other than rape and simple assault (Farrell, et al. 2019). While NCAVP measures serious hate crimes such as HIV-related violence and sexual assaults

Shortcomings of the Existing Hate Crime Laws

The existing hate crime statute is challenging on a policy basis. They obligated improved punishments for an offence committed because of or at least when escorted by certain states of mind that the government criticizes. The law holds citizen accountable for governing citizen minds that should control their action. Therefore, the statute has the expressive function of stigmatizing specific kinds of conducts. Nonetheless, crime hate law handles specific actions as especially unacceptable because the individual committing them had a hateful frame of mind. Such statute burden adjudicators with the mandate of detecting an enlarging number of impermissible intentions for acts already banned.

Improving Hate Crimes Statutes through Education

The government can reinforce the existing initiatives by adding tolerance education in secondary schools to assist children and youths associate to others from different culture and background. Fedotov (2019) affirmed that children identify sexual and racial difference in their early stages of life, and by age of 12, a child has already developed stereotypes. Therefore, it would be better to prevent a child from developing stereotype before trying to eradicate such attitude in an adult.

References

Farrell, A., Dank, M., Kafafian, M., Lockwood, S., Pfeffer, R., Hughes, A., & Vincent, K. (2019). Capturing human trafficking victimization through crime reporting. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.

Fedotov, Y. (2019). Strengthening the rule of law through education: a guide for policymakers. UNESCO Publishing. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/bja/162304.pdf