Function of Government in the Cases of Tragedy of Commons Essay

The government is mandated with protecting its citizens from any harm whether internally or externally anchored. In the case of the private citizen on whose land there is stagnant water in which mosquitoes breed, the government has to intervene to protect the public from potential infection with the Zika virus. In the tragedy of commons dispensation, the public often want to benefit from a natural resource. However, in this case, the tragedy of commons is overturned in that the public is at risk and the government's intervention is mandatory to protect them.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

On the 25th September 2017, Douglas Quenqua wrote an article in the New York Times about the continuing logging in China forests (Quenqua, 2018). Although the natural resource of the forest is public, the logging is detrimental to the maximization of its benefits. For instance, although the logging was providing an employment opportunity to the individuals perpetuating the business, the animals in the forest were losing their habitat in addition to the gradual destruction of the forests that would result in changes in the climate, as it was an act of deforestation (Quenqua, 2018). The case provided is different but relevant in that the interest of the public are at stake. For instance, the government has to invest financial resource to drain the water to protect the public from contracting the Zika virus spread by the mosquitoes.

In the case of the forests in China, the government intervened by arresting the loggers and thus, protected the forests from extinction. The arrests meant that other potential loggers became wary of the attempting the same and as a result, protected the natural resource that posses the heritage of the nation (Ostrom, 2015). In the case of the water, securing the facility would ensure that longevity of the availability of the water compared to when the public would be allowed to access it directly.

The second role of the government in this case insuring the comfort of the particular citizen on whose land the stagnant water bred mosquitoes. For instance, if the government's analysis informs that the draining of the stagnate water will take a lot of time leading to the discomfort of the citizen, the government can compensate the individual to provide room for through draining of the stagnant water (Ostrom, 2015). The compensation ought to ensure that the citizen purchases another piece of land and settles as fast as possible. By doing so, the government will have ensured the comfort of the individual and also protected the rest of the public from potential infection with the Zika virus. In the case of the forest in China, the government protected them to ensure that the tourist still found the animals to view (Quenqua, 2018). The funds emanating from the tourism activities are in turn invested in projects that benefits the whole nation.

Conclusion

In summary, the tragedy of commons is typical occurrence in most societies all over the world. The respective governments are mandated with the responsibility of protecting the public from potential harm. In the case availed, the authorities ought to drain the water to avert cases of mosquito-caused Zika virus. In the case of the Chine forests, the government is also mandated with protecting resources. The two cases provided diverse examples of the tragedy of commons in a society.

References

Ostrom, E. (2015). Governing the commons. Elinor Ostrom: Cambridge university press.

Quenqua, D. (2018). Pandas Are No Longer Endangered. But Their Habitat Is in Trouble. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/25/science/pandas-habitat-china.html