Free Essay on Online Dating and Traditional Dating

Introduction

The entire landscape of romance has taken another direction because online dating has taken traditional dating. For various reasons, online dating offers better alternatives to conventional dating. In short, online dating, as compared to traditional dating, is a romantic interaction between two adults through online interaction or communication platforms. Research conducted by Rosen et al. (2018), in the past, dating was limited due to settings like the workplace, school, and church. However, due to the increase of technology, dating has taken a different direction. The paper will elaborate more on why online dating is safer than traditional dating.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The internet has also expanded chances for people to develop and meet relationships through social networking platforms such as MySpace, online dating services, newsgroups, and chat rooms. It is vital to note that cases with traditional dating, people always become cautious when online dating is mentioned. To start with, people agree when they meet face-face because meetings tend to convince the personality and character of a person as preferred by their soul mates (Rosen et al., 2018). Similar to traditional dating, face-to-face meetings must be conducted in public places.

Online Dating Platforms

The online dating platform is still used to form the initial face-to-face meeting (traditional dating) is public places like movie theaters, public parks, and restaurants. Information revealed by online users should never be taken at face value. The reason behind this statement is that such information must be verified when an individual asks for the profile pictures (Rosen et al., 2018). This also assists in gaging the consistency of the other partner when they are communicating.

As compared to traditional dating, in online dating, the person can also see the signs if the dating will work out. As compared to conventional dating, it is clear that it is hard for a person to meet a stranger in online dating. Online dating platforms should also contain personalized media to make it more interesting (Gunter, 2013). Such cases make people get the chance to set up detailed profiles that are personal enough to describe their profession, location, dislikes, and likes. Such pertinent information is seen in people’s individual faces to increase the taste of the one interested to date the other.

As compared to traditional dating, online dating also increases the romantic relationships because interactions do not rely on physical meetings. In online dating, people can vet their partners more profoundly before they invest their feelings emotionally (Gunter, 2013). Therefore online dating has improved the chances of individuals to match with their partners. Online dating has also helped the daters to search for appropriate partners. In other words, online dating has enabled daters to find a custom-made partner that would not complicate the procedure due to the erroneous traditional dating concept.

Arguments Against

In an attempt to balance the argument on online dating, a few highlights have also been presented to argue against online dating compared to the traditional way (Gunter, 2013). For instance, many people claim that it is hard to tell if people dating online platforms are genuine. This is because it is hard to know if the individual information in the profile is accurate. In online dating, the daters must develop their profiles by adding physical descriptions, work situations, and photographs.

Any person can upload photos that do not rhyme with the information, which can be outdated or erroneous. This means that people can fabricate their stories in online dating platforms without using the traditional face-to-face meeting. For instance, most professional dating sites have checks and systems established set to minimize the concept of online deception (Gunter, 2013). Also, following the dating don’ts and do’s, one should be safe and allow online dating fruit. Also, to avoid sexual orientation, online dating offers safer platforms than traditional dating as the stigma attached to sexual harassment will be avoided.

Online dating is also considered a safe way of dating as compared to traditional dating. In Online dating, the physical meeting can be avoided unless the right time has come. For instance, it is hard to avoid a person who refuses to take a phone call in any dating scenario. In such a situation, any person who attempts to alienate a person who suspected him of being a suitor can be a stalker (Gunter, 2013). Therefore, online dating can totally or partially hide their identity until they meet a person they will be interested in a date. Therefore, individuals who use online dating platforms have a wide variety of tools to eliminate anonymous people.

Conclusion

Online dating, as compared to traditional dating, is a romantic interaction between two adults through online interaction or communication platforms. The paper has highlighted the difference between online and traditional dating. Even though there is a prerequisite caution concerning online dating, it remains the best way for people that are busy with the ones that need to try other alternatives when it comes to dating.

The popularity of online dating can also increase when people realize the benefits. Therefore the examples given concerning the difference between the two dating platforms show that online dating remains the best option for safety, choice, and validity. This is because online dating can totally or partially hide their identity until they meet a person.

References

Gunter, B. (2013). The study of online relationships and dating. Oxford Handbooks Online.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0009

Rosen, L. D., Cheever, N. A., Cummings, C., & Felt, J. (2018). The impact of emotionality and self-disclosure on online dating versus traditional dating. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2124-2157.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.10.003.