Essay Sample on Zero-Based Budget: Making Responsible Financial Decisions in Higher Education

Zero-based budget (ZBB) is a significant approach in reducing spending and making correct books in higher education facilities. It is a way to financial accounting that ensures leaders are responsible and minimize finances embezzlement. An organization in ZBB starts its budget level for new models with no funds. ZBB works perfectly in theory, and it is far typical to analyze some hybrid forms. Firms justify their programs, and the finances requested rather than holding to new funds that are more than the past budget margin.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Companies account for assets that move to the next financial year budgets. The budget begins at zero dollars, and new budgets are created along with all the business units. ZBB facilitates strategic objectives implementation in the budgeting process by connection to primary areas of the firm where costs are estimated against the contemporary expectations (Kurniawan et al., 2016). It allows organizations to lower costs by minimizing the decrease associated with prior research. The zero-based model has a budget that should be justified in the period the budget is created. It also assures active monitoring of the connection between institutional operations and goals.

The benefits of ZBB are that it focuses on the outcomes and is a rational method of budgeting that allows managers to find sufficient strategies for improving their business activities. It gives an opportunity of looting finances and provides accountability for all funds allocated to management. Also, it helps to implement smart solutions as administrators can generate decision packages that offer precise descriptions of operations, analyze costs, and measure performance.

ZBB gives detailed valuable insights on a variety of programs and events that a company undertakes. Other benefits are that preparing packages allows managers to make effective decisions as they know ways of implementing resolutions and can quickly identify issues that arise. Typically higher education institutions administrators can create decision packages to provide relevant and cost-effective models in the ZBB schemes instead of conventional approaches.

The drawbacks of ZBB are that it has a laborious process; it tends to improve anxiety and can lead to disincentive in focusing on pursuing initiatives. Also, various commitments tend not to be recognized as it is continuous and depend on consistent dedication. ZBB needs full responsibility, or one can embrace it, as positive outcomes can be noticed through creating time and resources.

Implementation of ZBB in 4-year research enables a firm to reach its objectives through the application and planning techniques. It allows that data is evaluated and executed in a precise manner. It links multiple particular functional areas of a firm where costs can be monitored and measured according to prior results and expectations. ZBB facilitates agency funding and integration in an organization (Jimenez, 2019). Implementing ZBB in community college creates a competitive advantage as it is accounted for differently, thus building a community decline. It is different from 4-year research as it allows higher levels of strategic objectives to be implemented in the budgeting process for development. In colleges, it provides control and implementation of activity-based campus budget location models sufficient for carrying out operations.

Schools and learning institutions function properly with adequate allocation of funds and resources. Ways in which learning institutions undertake their funding activities vary between nations. The ZBB is linked to a service-level approach in schools and is used to control expenditure. It is a key to long term sustainability as many institutions are striving to keep pace with the fast-growing environment. Adopting ZBB creates cost-effectiveness and develops enormous opportunities for savings. Through leverages protected entities, higher education institutions can protect their assets as it keeps the different finances of a firm separate.

Through coordination, higher education creates deep visibility in terms of costs and set saving measures for future budgeting cycles. Expenses can be estimated as strategic investments that facilitate growth and sustainability in the firms. ZBB evolves to influencing innovation and shaping the client's future (Ibrahim, 2019). The future education sustainability allows practitioners to achieve their needs of the current economy without complicating future expectations. Through the challenges faced today in a contemporary environment with transformative analysis, a future can be sustainable. Through governance and eco-systems, educational theorists can line up issues that they face today and create an optimistic future by envisioning a sustainable environment and policy process.

Factors that affect ZBB are the threat of big tech, regulations affecting costs stimulated, and digitalization. Big tech affects the effectiveness of ZBB as it helps organizations to plan themselves effectively and reduce their expenditure by lowering costs and estimating their funds sufficiently. It facilitates effective management and coordination. Regulations tend to affect how firms function effectively; this can impact future expectations through government or global measures. Digitalization allows a firm to be transparent in its activities and avoid errors associated with miscalculations and enables the firm to achieve its objectives in the long run. ZBB improves decision making and facilitates effective strategies by administrators. Inflation also affects the effectiveness of ZBB since when prices rise, then the economy and value of assets also change.

ZBB is effective in allocating resources and satisfying the needs of the firm and creating benefits. It allows managers to use cost-effective approaches to carry out their operations and achieve their goals. Administrators in higher education can detect inflated budgets and monitor their cashflows. The criterion used in this budgeting model is sufficient and not easily noticed; therefore, it is adequate for service departments.

References

Jimenez, K. T. V. (2019). A Comparison Study of Administrative and Academic Leaders' Preferred Budget Decision Criteria for Developing a Budget in Higher Education Institutions (Doctoral dissertation, University of La Verne). http://search.proquest.com/openview/7e8ef71672c4fdbc8da34e0d992624e2/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

Ibrahim, M. M. (2019). Designing zero-based budgeting for public organizations. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(2). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3402663

Kurniawan, A., Yuniarsih, T., & Sumarto, S. (2016, August). Budget Implementation in Higher Education. In 2016 Global Conference on Business, Management and Entrepreneurship. Atlantis Press. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/gcbme-16/25865887