Essay Sample on the Benefits of Nuclear Power Plants Outweigh the Potential Harmful Applications

Introduction

Since its inception as a source of power, nuclear energy has been through immense argument. Although nuclear energy provides an enormous source of energy using comparatively few raw materials, the waste it produces is hazardous to the living organism in an ecosystem. In the contemporary world, there are many benefits associated with nuclear energy which include.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Even though the construction and preservation of nuclear power plants have proven to be very costly, the reason that makes it's cost-effective is during the generation of electricity from nuclear-powered cauldrons which is inexpensive than energy produced from "oil, gas and coal" [11]. Another factor can be a nuclear power is renewable. Since the production of electric energy is continuous, for example, electricity spawned from atomic reactors is done almost 90% of the annual period, and this helps in decreasing the price unpredictability of other fuels such as petrol, oil, etc.

Electricity generated from nuclear reactors contains a steady sordid load of energy. It can along using other reusable energy sources such as "wind and solar" [11]. Generating electricity through nuclear power reduces the extent of electricity produced from vestige petroleum (Carbon and oil), this implies that greenhouse gases emissions are subsequently lowered. By reducing the uptake of fossil fuels will augment on refining the quality of the air, thereby improving the quality of life and decreasing the rate of cardiovascular diseases occur in humans.

Electricity created from nuclear power is more reliable as opposed to the reusable sources of energy, e.g. astral and gale since power creation from reusable sources is dependent on weather conditions, unlike nuclear power which can produce electricity continuously for several months without being interrupted. For example, Uranium lasts for more than 70 on the surface of the earth

Finally, nuclear energy sources have higher mass than fossil fuels, and this enables them to release vast amounts of energy. They also require low amounts of fuel, but that does not impede them to produce vast expanses of power.

The benefits of nuclear energy outweigh the potential detrimental repercussions whereby the emission of the greenhouse gases has decreased as a result of electricity production through atomic reactors since the generation of electricity through nuclear power does not emit gases like carbon dioxide or methane [7]. Hence this helps in ensuring the air is abundant in the quality of oxygen supply and reduces the risk of cardiovascular diseases like asthma, coronary artery disease and heart attack in humans. The second issue is that there is no adversative consequence on water, land or any living organism in an eco-system since there is no acid rain that results from greenhouse gases which erode the ozone layer. There is a continuous and efficient supply of energy, and it has lower miscellaneous expenses, even though it initially requires huge capital inflow to set up the nuclear plants the costs involved in operating them are small.

The role that nuclear energy should be in the current power grid is ensuring they enlarge the industry and increase electricity production across the world [8]. For example, the nuclear industry has set a goal to supply approximately 30% of the world's electricity by 2050, and this will mean there will be a need to construct 1000 GWe of new nuclear capacity. To achieve this goal, there has to be measures and steps to ensure this comes to reality by 2050 [8]. The measures include restructuring the energy markets, controlling and our idea of safety to make it a possibility. There is a need to ensure that electricity produced through nuclear power must be included along with all other low-carbon technologies, to ensure there is zero-emission and this will be focused on meeting its objectives by 2050. They also need to set out an active safety model concentrate on how they will be able to increase the nuclear capacity to meet their targets.

Power generation and use through nuclear reactors has been subjected to intense debate for over decades even though atomic energy has been considered as a viable energy source, which reduces the emanations of greenhouse gases, it's safety is still a significant concern on most people since its wastes and fuel are highly radioactive may be a threat to the health of those living in the eco-system. Some of the ethical issues that are of significant concern include comparison between the pros and cons of nuclear power [9], the adverse effect of accidents like the "Kyshtym accident "and "Chernobyl disaster"[10], and currently the "Fukushima disaster" associated with nuclear emissions, safety regulations and violations [9]We will also need to consider the impact of atomic energy on the inhabitants living in particular area where there are nuclear plants like mining and the dumping of harmful materials on densely populated areas which could be of harm to those living in those areas and full revelation on possible risks, quick information sharing can help rescue lives, lessen injuries and ease panics when a disaster occurs. A good example being the Fukushima disaster.

Conclusion

The benefits of nuclear energy outweigh the potential harmful implications whereby the emission of the greenhouse gases has decreased as a result of electricity production through nuclear reactors since the generation of electricity through nuclear power does not release gases like carbon dioxide or methane. Some of the ethical issues that are of significant concern include the comparison between the pros and cons of nuclear power, the adverse effect of accidents like the "Kyshtym accident "and "Chernobyl disaster" and currently the "Fukushima disaster" associated with atomicr emissions, safety, and violations.

Work Cited

R. Hawley and W. Turner, "Nuclear Power: The Environmental Benefits," Energy & Environment, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 95-103, 1994. Available: 10.1177/0958305x9400500201.

S. Amin and A. Giacomoni, "Smart Grid, Safe Grid," IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 33-40, 2012. Available: 10.1109/mpe.2011.943112.

L. Walters, D. Porter and D. Crawford, "Nuclear fuel considerations for the 21st century", Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 40, no. 3-4, pp. 513-521, 2002. Available: 10.1016/s0149-1970(02)00045-8.

F. Tikhomirov and A. Shcheglov, "Main investigation results on the forest radioecology in the Kyshtym and Chernobyl accident zones," Science of The Total Environment, vol. 157, pp. 45-57, 1994. Available: 10.1016/0048-9697(94)90564-9.

J. DeVine, "Conceptual benefits of passive nuclear power plants and their effect on component design," Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 299-305, 1996. Available: 10.1016/0029-5493(96)01211-3.