Essay Sample on Relativism: Kuhn Defends His Ideology of Paradigm Application

Introduction

Relativism in philosophy is a term that is used to describe what is right and true whereby all given points of view are regarded as valid, the given standard of reasoning and the process of justification are the products of existing differing conventions. Thomas Kuhn, a publisher of scientific books, writes a book whereby he is being criticized for the way he used the word paradigm. In his defense of trying to explain his ideology for the application of paradigm and he was accused of Relativism. Henceforth, the essay will aim to discuss Kuhn's reply in relation to the allegations that were imposed on him on the subject of Relativism and whether his response was sufficient.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The paradigm means discipline or model concerning beliefs and values of a given society, and it also means an example of something which represents what generally governs the typical science, Kuhn applies this term within his book, and he is heavily criticized for it. In Kuhn's defense, he claims that paradigms are not to be compared or they do not match with anything they are incommensurable. The study and knowledge of the idea of Relativism is quite broad, and various people tend to have to explain it in different views depending on one's beliefs and values that they respect. Kuhn explains, the subject of paradigm highly depends on the example that one gives to describe the central idea within it, and also the knowledge that one conveys which relies on the model.

Kuhn's replies on the allegations of Relativism were adequate and effective since he explains how he tried to relate the actual scientific facts to what is believed by people. People are not required to judge Kuhn's understanding and also his claims since it was just an example that could not match with the other people knowledge. Kuhn explains that incommensurable logistics tends to create a challenge within the concept of reality and also in the development of science.

In one of the allegations that Kuhn responded to was when he was accused of using the word maybe in quoting things that had scientific facts, but this did not mean that he was supposed to be misunderstood by claiming that their existence of reality of science. His response towards the claims was effective since he explains his reasons for using the word maybe and people should know that the word is applied to give one's opinion and not facts. Incommensurable means that paradigms should not be measured on commonly from the surface view and also it should not be measured entirely into details. Kuhn tries to reason that scientifically changes involve comparing existing paradigms whereby scientific results examines that one given model is better than the other. The example of comparing one thing to be better than the other is philosophical hence making Kuhn's argument to be adequate and effective.

In every theory that is proposed, some situations arise that tend to contrast from the given idea, but some examples can be applied in explaining every circumstance to bring an even and equal understanding to the divergent opinions. Kuhn argues that if a given theory fits the facts that support it better than another approach, then it can be a point of discussion rather than the method applied in proving the theory since it takes a general review.

Various theories can be compared against each other to create an assessment point of view, but it is not necessary to examine the arguments within the fundamental nature. One can compare existing examples with each other and also they can contrast them as well with what is within the surrounding or with the given truth that is rejected by Kuhn. According to Kuhn, this is not supposed to happen since examples tend to be different from their nature or from what is believed to be accurate; hence criticizing this point is not relevant. Kuhn claims that various theories that suggested something to be sure and another approach not supporting the given opinions, all the methods being matched against a different fact of choice or of not supporting the proposed judgment.

Kuhn as a philosopher is also blamed for not contributing to the success of science and making science to be possible in the world. His reply was based on how the development or progress of science was relying on primary goals and objectives. Kuhn does not approach science the same way other researchers view it which is an essential concept in thinking how the various aspects of nature can be grouped. Within this described context, Kuhn's claims were valid whereby he outlined the relationship that exists between science and the natural features concerning individuals' understanding.

Conclusion

In conclusion, according to the given replies by Kuhn, he generally viewed how examples introduced Relativism to society. He argues that cases should not be compared with their existing similarities and even different situations, yet in reality, since the meaning of the situation tends to differ. According to Kuhn, the study of science should not be misunderstood by the study of nature. Kuhn also continues to explain on the use of the word maybe that it should not be confused that it means that there is no absolute truth in a given theory, but it all depends with the relevant examples that are provided or in the science applied.

Work Cited

Kuhn, T. S. (2015). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.