Essay Sample on Korea-Japan Relations: 15 Years of Political, Cultural, Military and Trade Exchanges

International relation is a part of political science that is worried about associations between primary and countries with foreign rules. The evolving global structure is likely to be quite diverse from the ones that have heralded it. For more than 15 epochs, the affiliation among Korea and Japan was categorized by political contact, cultural exchanges, confrontations of the military and the commercial trade. These aspects also trigger their relationship even in the current world. During the prehistoric time, transfers of cultures and notions between inland Asia and Japan were widespread through immigration via the Neck of the land of Korea. From 1945, relations consist of three nations: Japan, South Korea, and North Korea.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Korea was cut off by Japan from Qing Chinese Suzerainty and the suzerainty of Japan. With the Japan-Korea Takeover Agreement of 1910, Japan grabbed control over Korea (Cooney and Scarbrough, 2008). The affiliation between South Korea and Japan has been dispensed a substantial setback following a reigning against the period of war forced toil of Koreans passed down by the Korean supreme court. The court judged under the unlawful colonial sovereign, where Korean individuals were forced to work in the Japanese companies. The court gave a ruling that these individuals had the right to seek reimbursement because they were unwillingly required to work in the Japanese Firms.

For many years there have fights between South Korea and Japan over many matters. With the Japan-Korea agreement of 1876, Japan decided to extend its occupation, additional of the market and attained a territory in Busan (Rozman and Lee, 2006). During the abdication eve of Emperor Akihito of Japan, the president of South Korea applauded the leader for his character in nurturing positive stalemates between South Korea and Japan. This action was welcome, and it symbolized a moment of positivity in a habitually anxious bilateral affiliation. The current occasions are just slight annoyances in general unfortunate associations among the regimes of both verges over territorial and historical conflicts.

When Japan was conquered in world war 2, the Soviet gained control over North Korea, and the forces of America took control over South Korea as they agreed to divide up the 38th parallel line. On 9th September 1945, North Korea gained its independence while South Korea gained its independence on 15th August 1945 (Stueck, 2013). In 1950, South Korea was attacked by North Korea, and it was almost defeated, but the command of the United Nations, international forces and American forces drove back North Korea and stopped it from attacking North Korea (Stueck, 2013). The United Nations wanted to capture North Korea to roll communism back there. Yet, China joined the battle and pushed the forces of the United Nations out of North Korea, and a military standoff occurred laterally the lines that were the same as the 38th parallel. In 1953, a settlement that is still effective was agreed, and the truce line of the same remains as the border of South Korea and North Korea (Stueck, 2013).

In 1965, the diplomatic relationships among South Korea and Japan were introduced. In the historical growth of negotiation where complexity is increasing in the world, diplomacy and all its indexes will continue to play an essential role (Dudden, 2014). Every year when the Prime Minister of Japan Junichiro Koizumi visited Yasukuni Shrine during his tenure, the relationship between South Korea and Japan soured every time. Since the beginning of the 20th Century, Japan took control over South Korea until when World War 2 ended (Dudden, 2014).

The former ambassador of South Korea to Japan Shin Kak-Soo said that the affiliation between Japan and South Korea is suffering a composite rupture unparalleled for the past five eras since the two nations introduced the diplomatic relations. The ambassador also said that the administration of Trump did not listen to the alliance. The crack developed after the supreme court of South Korea made a decision on October that ordered a steel maker of Japan to compensate all the employees of Korea who were forced into toil during the colonial rule of Japan. South Korea closed a foundation known as 'comfort women' that was established assist to care for the women of Korea who were involuntary enforced to join the sexual bondage in the brothels of Japanese forces during the world war 2. Japan sponsored the organization as a section of the 2015 agreement that envisioned to place the matter at rest.

After the 2015 agreement, Tokyo publicized the accusations that the warship of South Korea had protected its fire control locater on to a patrol plane of Japan, an issue that was thought as a predecessor to truly firing. Seoul denied the accusation, and he defended South Korea by saying that the Japanese plane had been hovering perilously low. The conventional prime Minister of Japan, Shinzo Abe and the liberal President of South Korea Moon Jae-in originate from different ends of the conceptual range. South Korea takes Shinzo Abe to be an isolated character, and they also see him as unenthusiastic to express true repentance for the behavior of Japan all through its imperial decree over the peninsula. The Japanese take Moon as the newest in an elongated line of the leaders of South Korea who have demoralized widespread antipathy of Japan to shore up their waning fame and broke promises on treaties signed by the former governments.

Tokyo accused the decision of the Supreme court by saying that it violates a 1965 agreement introducing diplomatic associations, where Japan offered South Korea Much needed financial help as reimbursement for forced toil. Shin said that if Japan takes a right spot, then most of the South Koreans would be interested in what they thought was justice. Moon who was a lawyer of the human rights himself once represented plaintiffs who were forced to work by the Mitsubishi company. The South Korean Liberals tend to view the 1965 deals as an unequal treaty that was executed by Japan on a weak state which is still healing from the effects of combat, commanded by Park Chung-hee who was a martial strongman, and he used to train the puppet state of Japan in Manchuria during the end times of World War 2.

A political disagreement over a small portion of islands that are managed by South Korea but still being demanded by Japan had also reddened hunger, especially when the President Lee Myung-bak paid the islands a visit in 2012 (Cooney and Scarbrough,2008). The relationship of South Korea and Japan is even made more complicated by the vast changes which have sailed through South Korea for more than five decades as the nation arose from the shadow of Japan to become a flourishing financial and democracy capital in its ways. Koichi Nakano said that South Korea continued to develop more and Japan could not admit that. The political professor science professor also noted that many leaders Japan are still trapped with a condescending arrogance towards South Korea thinking that it is a small and a less advanced nation.

According to one researcher from South Korea said that the ruling which was imposed meant that more than 20 million citizens of South Korea who existed during the colonial rule at that era had the right to seek for recompense. By the inheritance of this right of compensation, the right will be handed over to about 5 million people staying in South Korea in the current time. This condition gives people latent intuitions from the matters that are surrounding the present affiliation between South Korea and Japan. These issues aid us to foresee the same situation in other sections of Asia. This is because the associations between South Korea and Japan are an illustration of the nearby power affiliations between a colonized country and a previous suzerain nation since the 19th century.

The foreign administrators of South Korea and Japan said that the crack between the two countries was deepening regardless of them agreeing to uphold close communication, as Seoul introduced new accusations over ostensibly inflammatory voyages by the self-defense armies. Their meeting which was apprehended on the peripheries of the world economic forum represented the first face to face conversation within two ministers since consensual ties laidback throughout war labor recompense and conflicts over armed encounters. As per the side of the Japanese, the occasion was thought as a chance to discover new methods to put an end to the stalemate. But before those conversations, the defense ministry of South Korea said that the SDF planes had been intentionally flown at low heights near the naval vessels of South Korea for a multiple of times and defining it as an apparent provocation.

The year 2018 has been a trial for the relations of Korea and Japan. The two nations have dealt with the economic fallout of the assessment of Seoul of the 2015 consensual comfort women treat. During the conversation, the foreign minister of South Korea began the meeting by saying that those happenings were regrettable and very annoying. Kono replied to the discussion by saying that the notice of South Korea was unfortunate and he also defended the Japanese military by saying that they did not hover their planes at low height flights.

Suh Wook said they sturdily condemn such acts and that kind of move is repeated; they will undoubtedly take action their armies code of demeanor. The prime minister Shinzo Abe and the President of South Korea Moon Jae-in have upheld a functioning relationship and made a little improvement. Despite this relationship, rigidities are increasing, and it will wipe out the confidence of the leaders and far-seeing diplomacy to make sure that a disagreement will not happen. Looking at these countries form a different angle, South Korea and Japan have more similarities than their differences, but yet their relationship is fraught.

The bilateral affiliation between South Korea and Japan is one of the hardest to govern. Their problems started in 1910 when Japan captured the Korean peninsula which was ruled by the government of Yi dynasty. Three historical matters are lingering the mutual relations; these are wartime labor comfort women and how the history textbooks of Japan define the prewar behavior of Japan. In the present world, the relationship between South Korea and Japan appears to have sunk to its bottommost point because the two nations standardized their relations in 1965.

The bilateral tautness came to new levels when the Defense Ministry publicized that a South Korean Navy demolisher's aiming radar had sealed onto a Nautical self-protective military investigation aircraft. While abrasion over antiquity matters between Seoul and Tokyo is not fresh, the present chain of proceedings has been happening at times when many perilous trends are congregating. The first event is an inescapable 'Korea fatigue' in Japan. The deterioration of the bilateral affiliation precedes the present leadership in both nations.

Meanwhile, from the viewpoint of Tokyo, the most current cycle of the decline of the consensual association started when the president of South Korea Lee Myung-bak paid Takeshima a visit in 2012. His visit aimed to request that the Japanese emperor should apologize for the pre-independence protesters of Korea from the time of the colonial rule of Japan. This reiterated apprehension held by most political leaders of Japan and strategy elites that the political leadership of South Korea debates historical bequest matters with Japan for political benefits.

The retrieval that the bilateral affiliation made towards the termination of Park Geun-Hye's presidency with the ratification of the stretched overdue...