Essay Sample on Human Rights Violations: A Global Malpractice in Health Care

Introduction

Human rights violations in the health sector are prevalent malpractice in the contemporary world. According to Stromdahl et al. (2019), there is a lot of abandonment of the ethical principles that affect the welfare of the patients and the general healthcare fraternity. A study done in 2008 indicates that Nigerian gay man exhibited a lot of quandaries in the prevention and treatment of STI/HIV. 36% of men were prejudiced due to their sexual orientation, and 17% feared to walk along with the city due to the discrimination they faced from the health care sector. The implemented rights desecration entailed 41% who were blackmailed, 36% were harassed, 13% were denied places to sleep, and 11% were jailed due to their sexual alignment (Stromdahl et al., 2019). Such issues also contributed to the prejudice in the health sector instead of the institution protecting such people from the predicaments they faced. In essence, human rights violations in the health sector are ordinary negligence that affects the welfare of the patients due to their uninformed consent.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Wrong blood transfusion is unethical malpractice that has been common in the nursing sector. For instance, a case was exhibited in the Middle Eastern emergency sector where a 19-year-old patient was admitted at the Intensive Care Unit, and a wrong blood transfusion was given, resulting in the hemolytic transfusion reaction in the body. The rib fracture of the patient and the extensive tissue trauma caused internal bleeding affecting the wellbeing of the patient. In this scenario, the ethical consideration of healthcare was abandoned without the consent of the patient. Despite the medical errors, liabilities, non-compliance, ethics, and the healthcare principles, nurses failed to adhere to the principles of the healthcare and the organizational policy affecting the health of a patient (Mortell, 2019). In healthcare professionalism, any medical expert should recognize the whole procedure that should be implemented before engaging in any activity. However, in the contemporary world, the pharmaceutical sector ensures that all the processes are critically followed to ensure that there are no cases in the future.

Gender discrimination hinders women from accessing critical procreative healthcare and contribute to disparity more commonly. It is an unethical practice that hinders women from acquiring viable medical care and attention that they need in the health sector. It exhibits them from accessing the required contraceptives data, safe abortion, thus leading to the framework of sterilization (O'connell & Zampas, 2019). Human rights bodies such as the Inter-American Court of Human Rights was concerned about a case where a woman was involuntarily sterilized during the period of giving birth in case, IV v. Bolivia. The evidence indicated the stereotypes that women faced and the breach of the rights of consent. The human rights laws and regulations and the ethical practices have been implemented to ensure that there are no such cases that arise. Additionally, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) has indicated some of the procedures and issues that entail gender stereotyping and reproductive health to ensure that the lives of women are safeguarded. The Inter-American Court also suggests the significance of responsibility that FIGO can play in enhancing the ethical principles in the health institution (O'connell & Zampas, 2019). It ensures that there is guidance on the provision of the services and ensures that the gender stereotype is eliminated.

Ethical principles were abandoned in 2000 when a poor Peruvian refugee and a poor mother of three kids underwent a cesarean delivery in La Paz Bolivia. During the practice, a surgeon did fallopian tube litigation. It was done without her consent, and she was told a day after the practice that she had been sterilized. When she inquired about her health and the health of the unborn kid, she was told that the procedure was done since the future pregnancy would be dangerous. The client stated that she had not consented such health involvement, and the surgeon upheld that he had gotten an oral authorization during the undertaking. In essence, the practice was against human rights and ethical practices in the health sector. There was a lack of autonomy and consent of the client since she was not informed about the whole procedure that was undertaken (O'connell & Zampas, 2019). However, the case was presented in court, and it acted as a warning to most of the medical experts to ensure that they do any medical procedure with the consent of the patient, and the gender stereotype is eradicated.

Conclusion

In general, human rights violations in the medical sector are common misconduct that has affected the health of many patients without their consent. In Nigeria, for instance, cases of stereotypes due to gender orientation are common interfering with the rights of the patients to get medical services. For example, in 2008, ethical principles were abandoned, and people were discriminated against in the health sector without their understanding. Wrong blood transfusion and gender discrimination among women is another malpractice that hindered proficient medical practices in the health sector. The health institutions abandoned the ethical principles and the autonomy of the clients, thus going against their rights. The informed consent regulation of the patients was also neglected. However, the medical practitioners ensure that they follow all the medical processes required to prevent future predicaments through legal undertakings and taking the cases to courts, the health institutions also adhere to ethical principles of the patients due to the fear of being sued.

References

Mortell, M. (2019). A Case Study: Wrong Patient; Wrong Blood Transfusion: Is There A Theory-Practice-Ethics Gap? The Malaysian Journal of Nursing, 10(3), 22-28.

O'connell, C., & Zampas, C. (2019). The human rights impact of gender stereotyping in the context of reproductive health care. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 144(1), 116-121.

Stromdahl, S., Williams, A. O., Eziefule, B., Emmanuel, G., Iwuagwu, S., Anene, O., ... & Baral, S. (2019). An assessment of stigma and human right violations among men who have sex with men in Abuja, Nigeria. BMC international health and human rights, 19(1), 7.