Introduction
The kind of behaviors and reactions people deploy in their day to day life is bounded by ethical principles. Ethics are standards that help in determining what is right and wrong as they are regulated by the values that make people act in a particular manner. In this case, what is right or wrong is open to individuals’ opinions (Angelou and Heywood 72). As such, ethical standards are determined by the nature of what a human being is. Nature determines the kind of principles people are supposed to deploy in their day to day activities to enhance their survival, thus overcoming issues that could affect the quality of life. According to Orwell, the existence of human beings is conditional on the self-generated selection that requires them to practice a particular behavior. Therefore, all human beings share the same ultimate nature in principles. Nature requires people to follow particular moral obligations, thus acting in a particular way that helps to maintain social values (Hughes 32). Generally, nature influences conscience to determine whether a particular behavior is wrong and right, and this helps in maintaining ethical principles (Neruda 149). The issue of COVID 19 is surrounded by ethical standards that govern how people are supposed to do overcome the problem; however, the condition hinders individuals from exercising their freedom.
What Is Right and Wrong
In the past few months, the world has been facing a deadly threat, COVID 19, which has claimed many lives. Due to the high rate of spread, many activities across the world have been closed. For instance, most learning institutions across the world have been closed, and students have been forced to use online systems to enhance the continuity of their education (Mehta et al. 1034). According to experts in the field of health, the deadly virus does not move; instead, people have the responsibility of transferring it from one place to another (Angelou and Heywood 81). The World Health Organization illustrates that it is an ethical responsibility of people to ensure they keep washing their hands and keeping distance for the world to counter the virus. In this case, people have a vital choice in the control of the virus (Neruda 149). Therefore, individuals are given the mandate to select what is right and wrong in relation to virus control. For people to maintain and improve their quality of life, they are required to focus on understanding the ethical standards that are related to coronavirus disease (Angelou and Heywood 53). Every kind of behavior people choose to follow is associated with particular consequences. For instance, if they select to keep distance and wash their hand regularly, automatically, the world will manage to control the disease.
Tactic
Normally, people take a particular position in COVID 19 issues due to the concept of social good and bad outcomes. In this case, the kind of action people take prevails the social situation within a particular region. As such, how people interact with other aspects of the environment determines their reactions and perceptions of the world (Angelou and Heywood 90). Due to massive consequences that occur because of the spread of COVID 19, people have been forced to change their connectivity (Mehta et al. 1033). As such, the manner of people interact with others due to the deadly virus is impacted by ethical standards. In some cases, social concepts influence people to compare their level of standard against others within the surrounding (Angelou and Heywood 29). The approach helps in determining the best position to take due to an ongoing issue. Through the tactic, people can effectively analyze numerous approaches they take in regard to COVID 19, and this helps in understanding the best way to keep their lives safe. For instance, human beings may select to stay at home and avoid partying, which is a major exposure to the deadly virus (Mehta et al. 1034). Additionally, assessing and evaluating conducts is a critical style that may assist in understanding whether a particular behavior is right or wrong. The approach helps people in simplifying the worldview, thus developing more advanced ways of understanding their conduct (Hughes 32). As such, it is easier for people to ignore information that conflicts with the existing understandings. Ethical analysis is a crucial step that people need to take to ensure they realize the position they are taking on COVID 19 best fits their needs (Angelou and Heywood 39). Through the approach, it will be easier for the world to overcome some critical issues.
Ethical Standard
Despite the ethical standard being a crucial aspect in the control of coronavirus, there are numerous challenges that hinder its effectiveness. The ethical standards associated with COVID 19 hinders people from engaging in activities freely, as every decision that they take must align with social requirements (Orwel 43). Generally, society expects people to behave in a particular manner, and going against is perceived as a violation of standards (Hughes 32). For instance, people are required to follow numerous approaches set in place to control the virus, and failing to accept the approach triggers social conflict. Additionally, the world would be a better place if the society had adopted approaches such as recognizing the humanity of other individuals and respecting their dignity (Neruda 149). The approach would ensure society respects people's opinions irrespective of their conductions. Even though people have the right to make choices, all decisions that they make are limited within a particular social requirement (Mehta et al. 1033). Moreover, the approach would trigger social equality, thus avoiding biases that experience in day to day life, which diminishes human dignity (Angelou and Heywood 32). Therefore, it is wrong to force people to embrace particular conduct as it weakens their dignity (Angelou and Heywood 78). For instance, the approach of staying at home limits people from engaging in their daily activities, and this triggers more social and economic problems, which makes life harder.
Conclusion
In conclusion, COVID 19 is a critical issue that requires people to make a choice on the right and wrong aspects associated with particular approaches. Ethically, people are required to embrace the best choice, such as washing their hands and keeping distance to prevent themselves from the impact of the issue. For people to maintain and improve their quality of life, they are required to focus on understanding the ethical standards that are related to coronavirus disease. Every kind of behavior people choose to follow is associated with particular consequences. The social analysis helps people to understand the best ways to stay despite many issues. Through the approach, people have managed to overcome some critical issues that could cause vital issues and even death. For people to maintain and improve their quality of life, they are required to focus on understanding the ethical standards that are related to coronavirus disease. However, people are supposed to be given the mandate to regulate the kind of behaviors to deploy. Social requirements influence people to make decisions that fit within a particular aspect.
Works Cited
Angelou, Maya, and Heywood Hale Broun. Still I Rise. Jeffrey Norton Publishers, 1994.
Hughes, Langston. "Dreams." Collected Poems of Langston Hughes (1926): 32. https://www.arsdcollege.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AECC-Practice-SET-1.pdf
King Jr, Martin Luther. "Letter from Birmingham Jail (1963)." Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, and the Civil Rights Struggle of the 1950s and 1960s: A Brief History with Documents (1963). https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/coretexts/_files/resources/texts/1963_MLK_Letter.pdf
Mehta, Puja, et al. "COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression." Lancet (London, England) 395.10229 (2020): 1033. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7270045/
Neruda, Pablo. "The United Fruit Company." Selected Poems of Pablo Neruda (1992): 149. https://genius.com/Pablo-neruda-the-united-fruit-company-annotated
Orwell, George. Shooting an Elephant. Sv. bokförl.(Bonnier), 1962.
Cite this page
Essay Sample on Ethical Principles: Defining Right and Wrong. (2023, Sep 25). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/essay-sample-on-ethical-principles-defining-right-and-wrong
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- How Have Cell Phones Changed Communication?
- Undocumented Immigration and Healthcare Essay
- Evidence-Based Practice in the Workplace Paper Example
- The Issue of Vaccination Annotated Bibliography
- U.S. Marijuana Use: Federal vs. State Laws - Research Paper
- Essay Example on Racial Disparities in Diabetes Prevention & Care: Double the Risk for Hispanics & African-Americans
- Essay Sample on Case Study: A Common Technique in Nursing Practice