Essay Sample on Designing a Successful Grant Proposal: Evaluation, Budgeting & Benefits

Introduction

The successful grand proposal requires keen and critical procedural steps to complete. It takes longer to design an appealing and successful evaluation grant. It is very significant to narrow down all the structural segments needed to complete the design. This article will present the evaluation plan and its benefits, the arising differences, and the result of the evaluation process. Also in the topic is the budgeting types and relevance of such models concerning grant funding.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Benefits of an Evaluation Plan

Evolution plans are documented articles describing or showing one can monitor and evaluate a particular program. It also indicates the impact it will have, especially in improving the evaluation process as well as decision making. It gives clarity of how and why the program is relevant (Developing an Effective Evaluation Plan, 2011). An evaluation plan is very significant in designing a business grant proposal since it provides all the applicable guidelines for the evolution and application segments. The evaluation plan inspects the program, collecting and assessing data that is related to the project.

The evolution plan is also very significant in ensuring that the next evolution is feasible and informative (Martin, 2015). This means that most of the development written in today's report is very relevant in determining the fate of tomorrow's outcome. It is also essential to ensure that there are transparency and accountability through all the relevant stakeholders and the set up of the evaluation program. It also serves a referencing article, especially a new staff is the question of the previous orders for proposal and evaluation programs. It is also relevant in keeping the track record of the stakeholders and their ability to realistically develop the time-frame for the application to be processed.

An evaluation plan is also relevant in providing the procedural steps that are undertaken to complete the process. It also separates the information gathered and the person who is supposed to receive it, the stakeholder or an individual, based on the type of information. This is relevant in collecting the necessary data that only fit for the program and not outside the program. The evolution plan is as well servers the impotence of choosing the best strategies and methods that is relevant in the collection and processing of the relevant data.

Differences Between Process Evaluation and an Outcome Evaluation

The process evaluation regulates all the programming activities and determining the mode of implementation results concerning what was expected. This kind of evolution can be conducted over and over to make the programming up to date. The process entails an intensive review of all the components and activities related to the evaluation program. The evaluation process, on the other side, decides if the set applications and their implementations have succeeded and resulted in the relevant intended result. It can also be done and reviewed over and over, making sure its activities and elements are up to date with the overtime realistic changes (Glesmann, 2016).

Process evaluation is very significant in developing and documenting comprehensively, the reality of the purpose of the program. It gives insight information of the program is working and whether it is working following the intended role. The roles are defined based on who is being served, what they are serving, and how they are serving the respondent. The information related to the program and the theoretical approach, how it impacts on the society, purpose, and mode of implementation.

The organization and collection of process evaluation employ specific models that are significant in analyzing the contextual nature of the program. Factors affecting this kind of evaluation includes identifying and selecting participants, goals of the program, and all the interrelations influencing the function of the program. All the data are collected through a strategized methodological process. The process includes an interpersonal interview, observation, literature review, and the compilation of all the demographic data that is relevant for the evaluation.

On the other hand, outcome evaluation carries out the process of assessing the achievement of the program as predetermined. This type of assessment explains whether there is a variation of work, in terms of the participation, behavioral changes, and norms relevant to the evaluation. It also employs qualitative and quantitative data analysis even though the conclusion is defined by the quantitative approaches of the statistical report. The outcome evolution process entails both the two types of data analysis except for the statistical report.

Another feature of the outcome evolution is that it involves a specific research analysis and design named experimental (quasi-experimental). This method selects its samples randomly where any participant equally stands a chance to participate upon selection. The examples can be chosen from a group of individuals who can be either from a group or from among the identified individuals who are fit for range. The groups can be categorized into two, that is, control and treatment groups. The outcome of the two is interrelated, and a conclusive result is tabled.

The two evolution programs can be subjected to shortcomings or disadvantages based on their results. Process evolution does not explain the possible changes arising from the program concerning the participating parties. Outcome evaluation also does not disclose or provide accumulative information based on the operational activities of the program. In terms of getting funds and substantial stakeholders, outcome evolution is the best feature for them to consider. Programming and management of such applications rely much on the process evaluation for them to determine parts that are fit for improvement. Generally, the two evaluation programs produce the best and reliable data and the modification of the current plans, among other functions.

Types and Uses of Grant Budgets

Discretionary Grant Funding

This type of funding is also known as aggressive form of financing. This type of grant is given through a detailed analysis of the selected program or proposal, as stipulated by the evaluation of the concerned reviewers. For this fund to issues, the plan must explain the possible advantages, the targeted audience, and the participants. The success of the proposal depends on how it is demonstrating its key demands and outcomes. The program with the highest point is granted the fund. The US security sector allows for about 30 forms of grants per year (Pham, 2010).

Formula Grand Funding

This kind of funding depends on a particular procedure in allocating their funds as opposed to the competitive one. That is, it is not based on any form of competition but a set structured guideline in determining which party to receive the fund. Such procedures are marked based on factors such as the general population and the minimal requirements that the group has. The grouped that scored the list result are still entitled to be funded.

Continuation and Pass-through Funds

The continuation grant is offered to the participants in the current system as a mode of continual assessment is predetermined. It may be open for new applicants who meet the requirement of the grants even though the existing parties are more considered and given priority to access the grant. Pass through the system, on the other side, is given to government institutions like the federal body for local development. The government allocates preferable funds to the respective local jurisdiction as prescribed by the competitive or formula funding process.

Conclusion

In conclusion, evolution plans are documented articles describing or showing one can monitor and evaluate a particular program. It also indicates the impact it will have, especially in improving the evaluation process as well as decision making. The process evaluation regulates all the programming activities and determining the mode of implementation results concerning what was expected. This kind of evolution can be conducted over and over to make the programming up to date. The process entails an intensive review of all the components and activities related to the evaluation program. The evaluation process, on the other side, decides if the set plans and their implementations have succeeded and resulted in the relevant intended result. It can also be done and reviewed over and over, making sure its activities and elements are up to date with the overtime realistic changes. Types of grant funding include discretionary grant funding, formula funding, continuation funding as well as pass-through funding.

References

Developing an Effective Evaluation Plan (2011). Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity.

Glesmann, C. (2016). Comparing Process and Outcome Evaluations. NCCD. https://www.nccdglobal.org/newsroom/nccd-blog/comparing-process-and-outcome-evaluations

Martin, B. A. (2015). Plan for Program Evaluation from the Start. Having an assessment in mind when designing a program can help ensure the success of future evaluations.

Pham, B. (2010). Law Enforcement Grants: The Four Main Types of Grant Funding. https://blog.ecivis.com/bid/48460/law-enforcement-grants-the-four-main-types-of-grant-funding