Essay Sample on 2016 US Election: Clinton Wins Popular Vote but Trump Wins Presidency

Introduction

2016 marked a successful and failure in the U.S. political norms. Majorly, all predictions during the campaign highlighted that Hillary Clinton would be named a victor over Donald Trump (Prokop, 2016). The electoral outcome reflected that Hillary Clinton received roughly three million votes more than Tramp based on the result of Los Angeles, New York, and the District of Colombia. Unfortunately, the U.S. electoral system is not known for its Electoral College, which represents less ration of the population as a means of making decisions. Majorly, according to the U.S. voting history, the 2016 presidential voting outcome reflected that Trump was victorious in various Midwestern as well as Pennsylvania (Prokop, 2016). Majorly, Trump's victory was highly associated with several norms; for example, it was his first time to run for the presidency; established and was supported the white wave. Nevertheless, in Trump 2016, the election made it more ideal and appealing to residences of Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, among other states, to the liberty to select the president of the United States of America (Brownstein, 2016). Therefore, the paper analyzes the events that took place in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

In 2016, the presidential election marked one of the royal battles between the states as well as the electoral votes. According to the electoral outcome, Hillary Clinton had the privilege of leading and winning Vermont, while Trump won in Alaska, but as per the norms and the U.S. Constitution, any candidate that got 270 or more votes and a majority of 538 was declared the winner (Prokop, 2016). In other words, when Donald Trump won the Alaska states, it had an impact in the Republican Party's norms, for example, the political party had to nominate elector slated in the city which resulted to former Alaska's Gov. Sean Parnell, Jacqueline Topou, and Carolyn Leman becoming elected (Prokop, 2016). The same process repeated itself all over the nation; thus, resulting in the selection of either the Electoral College system with 538 electors who cast their votes for the president in their respective states (Prokop, 2016).

During the same time, the Democratic and Republican parties developed substantial standards in a chain of the states. Furthermore, the presidential election was determined through the implementation of Electoral College swings (Brownstein, 2016). The swing states were a norm where the towns identified their dominance through identifying their weaknesses/consequences where the states chose to allocate all its voters in the standards of the person that occupied the first place nationwide regardless of the victory margin. The system established that it never mattered if the opponent won a state by a percentage or of a percentage margin since the candidate will have an equal amount of electoral votes (Prokop, 2016). Basically, with such a system, the general election implemented the standard where the presidential candidates ignored the non-competitive states and focused on the competitive ones. In simple terms, the system enhanced the implementation of resources into states that had significant impacts on the general election as a means of attaining the required outcome 270 (Prokop, 2016).

During the presidential election, it was evident that much had changed, and it was going to affect the total outcome of the vote. The United States of America's conventional political approach has long been a practice that stated that a political candidate would not be held worthy if he/she did not first win Ohio. The system has been in place since 1860 that promoted that the individual with the majority victory on the states was declared the victor of the general election (Prokop, 2016). In 2016, the national political strategy became better and wiser, since it initiated the norms that Ohio was not the electoral predictor; thus, it resulted in the alterations on the demographics (Brownstein, 2016). The primary reason behind placing much emphasis on Ohio and Pennsylvania, among other states, was due to its population that was composed of white, older, and less learned people. On the other hand, states such as North Carolina and Arizona were occupied by diverse, young, and well-educated citizens; thus, making it more difficult for politicians to convince them (Brownstein, 2016). The importance of Ohio was due to its influence in solidifying Republican practices.

Nevertheless, Trump's victory was not accounted for as one of the ideal wins in the presidential race; thus, making it be contested on various occasions. The outcome reflected that Trump defeated his opponent (Brownstein, 2016). The victory was highlighted in Trump's dominance in Florida, North Carolina, and Ohio. Fortunately, due to the electoral system, Clinton's majority vote did not count since the U.S. voting system did not support it. Majorly, the U.S. Constitution reflected that 538 electors were in the perfect position to rubber-stamp the results of their respective states, and there were limited assurance on the outcome of the 2016 election (Prokop, 2016). Nevertheless, according to the National Conference of State Legislature, it is indicated that thirty out of fifty states passed the binding law, which allowed the electors to vote in respective with the superior presidential vote of the state (Brownstein, 2016). The penalty of not abiding by the policy was a penalty, and it was unclear on the approach. Unfortunately, even if the outcome was contested, their strategy had never been tested since the Constitution did not highlight that the electors had the final call of a presidential election (Prokop, 2016). The result of the 2016 rigged allegations did not create many magnitudes since it had never been witnessed in the U.S. before.

Conclusion

To conclude, the United States of America 2016 presidential election reflected that Donald Trump was the victor after attaining the majority state. Indeed, it was a unique turnout since the primary opponent Hillary Clinton won the majority vote nationwide, but yet she has never declared a victor. Essential participation of the event reflected that during the same period, there might have been a turn of events. For example, due to the population norms such as race, ethnicity, and age in states such as Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, among other countries, the electoral system indicated that the candidate that had the majority votes was the automatic winner. Also, the 2016 presidential election was among the most highlighted royal battles since it relied upon the norms and standards set by the Electoral College swings. It is a system that strengthened the U.S. constitution since it did not rely on voter outcome but the state majority results. Presently, the United States of America's political norms are changing. The change is focused on the political myth on Ohio as a critical determinant of the presidential election victory. Finally, even though Trump was declared the winner, various situations reflect on the rigging of the election.

References

Brownstein, R. (2016, November 10). How the Rustbelt Paved Trump's road to victory: The president-elect won by locking in support from traditional "blue wall" states Hillary Clinton thought were in her corner. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/trumps-road-to-victory/507203/

Prokop, A. (2016, December 19). Why the electoral college is the absolute worst, explained. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/7/12315574/electoral-college-explained-presidential-elections-2016