Essay on Sub-Saharan Africa Excluded from Global Poverty Reduction: Revisiting Beijing-Washington Consensus

Compelled based on a recent survey by World Bank concerning the accomplishment of the Millennium Development Goals showing that deprivation has decreased in all regions around the world excluding Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), this research brings some quantitative framework into analytical and analytical studies on reconciling the Beijing paradigm with the Washington Consensus. This checks the theory that, by concentrating on financial governance as opposed to political regulation, minimal-income countries will experience more sustainable growth relative to middle-income countries. The supporting evidence for 2000-2012 was focused on collaborative and non-interactive analysis for static consequences and 49 nations in the SSA (Asongu and Roux 2018, 5). Despite the developing countries having ways to control their economies, various regions continue to suffer poverty challenges.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

According to Banks, Kuper and Polac (2017), "it is known that illness and suffering work in a loop, each reinforcing the other" (2). While there is a firm agreement on the presence of a correlation, there is a shortage of rigorous scientific evidence to support and explain this possible connection. A systematic review was therefore conducted to investigate the association between impairment and economic deprivation, concentrating on the condition in low-and middle-income (LMICs) countries. Internationally, about 15 million of the world's population representing 1 billion people is reported to be dealing with a disability. It is known that deprivation and illness work in a loop, one reinforcing the other. Besides, poverty-related conditions such as lack of access to health care, insufficient water and sanitation, hunger, and unsanitary conditions in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) increase the risk of injury. In the absence of extreme poverty, social injustices and relative poverty can contribute to anxiety and social alienation that can make health and wellbeing, and working to become worse. On the other hand, it can help to disabilities being excluded from work, education, increased prices of healthcare and other disadvantages.

Most Arab political systems are distinguished by a unique distribution system focused on surplus public employment and large-scale energy subsidies features that occur in other developing countries but are more prominent in the Arab world. If there has ever been a social contract in the low-and mid-income countries of the Arab world, it has broken down poorly in recent decades- and, as the uprisings that have taken place since 2011 have shown, in some instances have broken down entirely. This is not because governments have not sought to provide for their citizens: in the post-second world war period, amid relatively low levels of economic development, many Arab countries have developed high aspirations to spread the wealth among their populations. Compared to other economies in the developing world, Arab countries are primarily characterized by the size of government employment and subsidies, notably but not only for energy production (Hertog 2017, 4).

References

Asongu, Simplice A., and Sara Le Roux. "Understanding sub-Saharan Africa's extreme poverty tragedy." International Journal of Public Administration 42, no. 6 (2019): 457-467. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01900692.2018.1466900?journalCode=lpad20

Banks L., Kuper H and Polac S. "Poverty and disability in Low- and Middle-Income countries: A systematic review." PLoS ONE 12, no.2 (2017). https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0189996&type=printable

Hertog, Steffen. "The Political Economy of Distribution in the Middle East: Is There Scope for a New Social Contract?." International Development Policy| Revue Internationale de politique de developpement 7, no. 7, (2017). https://journals.openedition.org/poldev/2270