Essay on Prejudice: An Unjustified & Unenthusiastic Approach Towards Groups

Introduction

Prejudice is an unjust and habitually an unenthusiastic approach toward certain affiliates of a group. Ordinary aspects of prejudice are inclusive of negative feelings, stereotyped ideas, and a propensity to classify against members of the group. Individuals grasp prejudicial attitudes toward the rest; hence, there exists some tendency to consider individuals who fit into a definite group as being all identical (Nelson, 2009). Attitudes and behaviors of a group may offer the provision of a painting that every person holds a meticulous distinctiveness or beliefs with a considerable battle and fail to consider every person as an exceptional individual. Additionally, prejudices repeatedly commence in the appearance of stereotypes. A stereotype is an unconstructive belief about persons on the basis exclusively of their association in a group, in spite of their characteristics. A group behavior of over-generalizing may influence a particular prejudice that may be applied to members of a group.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

How Membership in a Group Influences Social Judgment

Social forces in group membership adequately influence people's judgments. Typically, individuals tend to have a sense of belonging to a specific group. Consequently, others have the desire to avoid contradictory with others; hence, they adjust their judgments to robust in more with all that the group suggests. One instance of a realistic true-to-life study was carried out by Simpson in 1939. In this study, every associate of a four individuals group first observed a set of four pictures and positioned the images in classification depending on how much they appreciated them. After the designation, they assembled collectively and discussed as a group on how to grade and classify the pictures. In conclusion, all individuals prepared a second personal judgment. It curved out that of the 108 individuals in the group, the decisions of 106 congregated toward the standard position of the group individuals for the pictures from their initial to the subsequent person rankings. Observed in another manner, a gauge of distinction in estimation dropped with an average quantity of 36 percent amid the two classifications.

How Portrayal of Ethnic, Cultural, and Social Groups by the Media Influences Social Perception of the Group And Perpetuates Stereotyping

News media are influential forces in establishing and perpetuating unenthusiastic cultural stereotypes, particularly regarding racial and ethnic groups (Mastro, 2009). Research has shown that in television films, characters from non-dominant racial and ethnic groups repeatedly plunge into prescribed tropes. Besides, their storylines effortlessly go behind cliche narratives. The steadiness of these illustrations strengthens stereotypes prompting them to be further available in our brains. To transform perceptions, we must change our cultural landscape into one that puts forward people of color in all of their complicated humanity, rather than relying on tired stereotypes.

How Subtle Stereotyping and Cognitive Dissonance can Affect the Ability to Bring about Social Change

Cognitive dissonance and subtle stereotyping can take place in numerous areas of life. Still, it is mainly apparent in circumstances where a person's behavior diverges with ideas that are essential to their self-identity. The two aspects play a responsibility in many assessment judgments, decisions, and valuations. A significant number of populace discards unconcealed racism at present. Nonetheless, subtle stereotyping exerts unconstructive effects hence threatening social identity, which damages an individual's prospects for achievements, predominantly for persons who are already collectively deprived. Having the conscious of how contradictory beliefs affect the decision-making procedure is an immense technique to advance one's aptitude to establish more rapid and precise choices (Amodio, 2014).

Ethical Challenges Researchers Face when Conducting Research on Controversial Topics

Researchers face numerous ethical challenges when researching in their respective fields. Below are some of the ethical difficulties explained in detailed information. One of the ethical challenges faced by researchers is the revelation of delicate individual information. Tape and storing individual-level restricted data can create dangers if the data is alert, in the logic that revelation could prompt damage for a research contributor. Some instances of delicate information include the following; Information concerning a certain illegal deed, work-related dealings that, if recognized, could harm the person's service, monetary or legal components of a person's existence which, if openly acknowledged might prompt distinctiveness theft or fraud.

Another ethical challenge is the emotional or psychological trauma experienced by respondents whenever they are requested to depict a throbbing occurrence or a stigmatized individuality that they consider hard to share publicly. Numerous individual experiences such as those of hostilities, immigrant flight, assault, or intense sickness and damage are amongst the anticipated traumatizing matters of the interview.

Making it definite that the research subjects' contribution is well-versed and deliberate is another ethical challenge faced by ethical researchers. Research activities should be inclusive of an informed permission process that: ensures the identification of the researcher, portrays what is being asked of the individual, elucidates that the respondents do not have to partake if they do not wish to and explains any possible advantages to both the contributor and the society.

Protecting individuals who are associates of a vulnerable group is another ethical challenge that researchers face. A group of persons whose capability to provide kind knowledgeable permission is the possibility to be impaired in some way. They possibly will not be competent to assess the risks of exploring participation entirely. They may also experience a oblige to contribute in research since their association to the investigator or their freedom is shortened. Wholly conversant permission may not be guaranteed for them since the consequences of their research contribution are erratic.

Implications and Consequences for Society of not Addressing Prejudice and Stereotyping

Prejudice and stereotyping have enduring unpleasant impacts. They prompt persons whose group is embattled by pessimistic stereotypes to fail whenever they attempt to do exceptionally well at tasks that are related to the stereotype. In these circumstances, mere recognizance that there is a stereotype in opposition to them can direct persons to do further feebly on the assignment than they would. When individuals doubt their aptitude to execute well, they may perhaps build up explanations to explicate deprived performance that do not damage their self-esteem. Solitary frequent mechanism is self-sabotage.

In conclusion, society is likely to experience numerous physical health problems that come along with discrimination. It is adequately evident that perception tends to be stressful for individuals who have had an occurrence of it. Moreover, health personnel has proved that stress amplifies the lifetime risk of numerous fatalities such as those of heart attack, stroke, cancer, diabetes. Notably, it is essential to recognize that physical and mental health problems move jointly.

References

Amodio, D. M. (2014). The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(10), 670-682.

Mastro, D. (2009). Racial/ethnic stereotyping and the media. The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects, 377-391.

Nelson, T. D. (2009). Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. Psychology Press.

Sanjari, M., Bahramnezhad, F., Fomani, F. K., Shoghi, M., & Cheraghi, M. A. (2014). Ethical challenges of researchers in qualitative studies: The necessity to develop a specific guideline. Journal of medical ethics and the history of medicine, 7.

Sechrist, G. B., & Stangor, C. (2001). Perceived consensus influences intergroup behavior and stereotype accessibility. Journal of personality and social psychology, 80(4), 645.