Essay on Personal Worldview Inventory

Prime reality could be defined as the concept of believing in God. In my understanding, this fact of a living God is revealed through the scriptures. The concept of postmodernism disputes the fact that God is existent. Instead, it acknowledges the existence of matter is dictated by the ideology of naturalism. In my view, spirituality is depicted by the prime reality in the sense that people hold the belief of the unseen Supreme Being who varies in different world religions (Gottlieb, 2013). Importantly, the invisible aspect of life is the prime reality which is associated with spirituality.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The world seemed to be organized and created in a kind of orderly manner. The various ideologies of the character of the world differ when evaluated from divergent concepts. For example, scientism explains the origin and existence of the world through scientific knowledge and techniques. In my opinion, the world was created by a Supreme Being who is God. As such, I believe that God created the world and the Biblical teachings are relevant and valid. In this view, I hold the intuition that it did not exist as a matter (Kuntz, 2017). The orderliness aspect is evident in the Bible when one evaluates the wordings in the book of Genesis.

The term human being has various meanings developed from divergent viewpoints. For the scientists people have a higher Intelligence Quotient also abbreviated as the IQ. As such, these characteristic features direct scientists to believe that human beings are sophisticated apes. In my experience, the term means the most complex being of existence. I take sides with the definition that the human being is a sleeping god of some nature. As such, the scientism definition of a person to be a sophisticated ape would lack meaning. Subsequently, the dual state of a being and a spirit would befit the definition of pluralism. My definition would also take sides in the case of spirituality that views humans as a creation of equal likeness to God (Gottlieb, 2013).

Religion provides that the state of mortality is a departure or passage to another form. Scientism lacks proof of the same reasoning given the failure to explore the possibility of a human beings existence in the dual form. In my understanding, when a person dies, they are transformed to another state (Olson, 2016). Thus, when one dies, the spirit is transformed into another being. As such, I firmly believe that during death a person is changed to another state or life. Supporting ideology is derived from religious societies that apprehend matters on life after death. This decree of life is significant for these religions given that fact that there is a rationality element.

Spirituality is a concept that is existent in every human being. The possibility of one to know everything originates from the concept of spirituality. For instance, Biblical teachings provide that God created man in His image and likeness. Thus, the close resemblance of the human beings means that other Godly features are incorporated. In this view, one would not possibly know everything even though they may attempt to understand several disciplines (Stenmark, 2017). Then again, scientism justifies the human thinking and rationality given that consistent evolution process. Under such projections, I believe that the continued development of the brain from childhood to adulthood would be termed as the evolution projected by scientific knowledge. In my understanding, it is not possible for one to know everything given the diverse fields as justified by scientism. Justifiably, the wide scope of disciplines in the world cannot allow for the comprehension of everything. Additionally, the continuous discovery work by scientists eliminates the chances of knowing everything. Importantly, human beings remain a subject of study. The ideology behind the knowledge of right and wrong is adopted through a closer analysis of spirituality. The scripture provides that man was created by a Supreme Being whose deeds are good (Gottlieb, 2013). In this view, the thought to commit evil or wrong is eliminated through Gods spirit. In my opinion, the knowledge to distinguish right or wrong originates from the human instinct which is developed from an impetus act in the physical survival of man. As such, one would easily separate rights from wrongs given their abilities. Personally, I hold the belief that God guides mans survival through his spirit.

The history of humankind refers to the origin of the human being. The existent period of man would also be considered a relevant as provided by scholarly material in the concept of scientism. Religion, on the other hand, would provide the human history as the period through which God created man (Paloutzian, 2013). In such a doctrine, the birth of human beings, the process of living and eventually death would represent the concept of the history of humankind. In my view, I feel that the history of mankind entails the conception at birth, life on earth and the transition to another being after death.

References

Kuntz, M. (2017). Science and Postmodernism: From Right-Thinking to Soft-Despotism. Trends in Biotechnology, 35(4), 283-285.

Stenmark, M. (2017). Scientism: Science, ethics and religion. Routledge, London.

Gottlieb, R. S. (2013). Spirituality: What it is and why it matters. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Olson, R. (2016). Scientism and technocracy in the twentieth century: The legacy of scientific management. Lexington Books, Lanham.

Paloutzian, R. F. (2013). Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality. Guilford, New York.