Essay on Incompetence of Andrew Wakefield's Autism

Introduction

The article by Andrew Wakefield in 1999 concerning the relationship between autism and MMR vaccination emerge to be very much inappropriate according to my field of view. The incompetence of Andrew's article is outlined in this study with outstanding reasons to back up my stand. First, vaccination has been realized to contribute to many disorders, mostly to children. Parents of these children complain a lot seeking for justice concerning the risk (BMJ, 2011). In the medical field, and nature of vaccination should be advantageous to the parties involved, and mostly it should sound medicinal and helpful against several diseases. The reason why the article by Andrew becomes inappropriate, these vaccinations have many disadvantages and posed a significant risk to children even though he claimed for a better relationship with autism.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Similarly, the temporal link between the two that is autism and MMR vaccination raise many questions in the mind of different people. The ten co-authors out of the known twelve also interpreted the data surrounding the article relating to autism and MMR vaccination. These authors did not find a clear link concerning the two, and the data as well as insufficient. The same as well expose the article by Andrew as inadequate. The Lancet as well narrated that Andrew Wakefield could not show the financial interest. Andrew was financed by the parents who were involved with the lawsuit contradicting the comping on vaccination. This outline that the article was then not genuine towards the research and hence not reliable. The same pit Andrew into scientific misconduct or other violations of human ethics.

How I Might Change My Practice after Reading Original Document

Upon reading the original document, many thoughts must have just emerged since the report is much convincing if at all, you don't have the other side of the story. I would have supported Andrew more excellent deal and, with much pressure, condemned the MMR vaccination. I value the life of young children because they hold much on the next generation. In any case, a vaccine can hinder the health of a young age, by all means, it worth rejection. I would as well support the parents fighting for the lawsuit since what matters is the excellent health of the children. Nevertheless, the original document could have made me doubt vaccinations, in which medical agents always come up within the name of better prevention of most diseases.

The same could even bare me from encouraging parents to seek vaccinations for their children since it does not produce a more significant impact on the health standards concerning the original document. The code of ethics for nurses relate to my decision after reading the original document away. Nurses should uphold integrity with certification as well as licensing of every medical work (Hviid, 2019). The original document was not certified and could not make one's ground of coming up with a decision.

How I would Change My Practice after Reading Lancet Retraction

The lancet retraction exposes all the ethical violations concerning Andrew's article. This retraction would diverge my attention immediately that without judging or even concluding on a particular article, it is vital to understand the credibility of the named material. Additionally, the retraction from Lancet would have made me absurd with people who negotiate an article as a result of financial benefit.

When it is reasonable to adopt practice in research

In conclusion to this study, it is crucial to adopt a practice after being seconded by different authors, and the articles should come from reliable and certified sources. Finally, research should be done by a good number of people and should speak more of close or even related arguments to enhance its credibility.

References

BMJ 2011; 342 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5258 (Published 11 January 2011)

Hviid, A., Hansen, J. V., Frisch, M., & Melbye, M. (2019). Measles, mumps, rubella vaccination and autism: A nationwide cohort study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 170(8), 513-520.

Leutzsch, M., Falkowska, M., Hughes, T. L., Sederman, A. J., Gladden, L. F., Mantle, M. D., & Hardacre, C. (2018). An integrated total neutron scattering-NMR approach for the study of heterogeneous catalysis. Chemical communications, 54(72), 10191-10194.